These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4023234)
1. Esophageal imaging by MR and CT: study of normal anatomy and neoplasms. Quint LE; Glazer GM; Orringer MB Radiology; 1985 Sep; 156(3):727-31. PubMed ID: 4023234 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evaluation of malignant biliary obstruction: efficacy of fast multiplanar spoiled gradient-recalled MR imaging vs spin-echo MR imaging, CT, and cholangiography. Low RN; Sigeti JS; Francis IR; Weinman D; Bower B; Shimakawa A; Foo TK AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Feb; 162(2):315-23. PubMed ID: 8310918 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Esophageal carcinoma: Ex vivo evaluation by high-spatial-resolution T Wei Y; Wu S; Gao F; Sun T; Zheng D; Ning P; Zhao C; Li Z; Li X; Li L; Zhu S J Magn Reson Imaging; 2017 Jun; 45(6):1609-1616. PubMed ID: 27711986 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Carcinoma of the esophagus: CT vs MR imaging in determining resectability. Takashima S; Takeuchi N; Shiozaki H; Kobayashi K; Morimoto S; Ikezoe J; Tomiyama N; Harada K; Shogen K; Kozuka T AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1991 Feb; 156(2):297-302. PubMed ID: 1898802 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Advanced carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus: CT, MR, and echo-endoscopy in the staging after chemotherapy]. Suman A; Fiore D; Macchi C; Castoro C; Peracchia A Radiol Med; 1991 Oct; 82(4):443-9. PubMed ID: 1767050 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Echo endoscopy (EUS), computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance (MR) in the staging of malignant esophageal tumors]. Meroni E; Spinelli F; Spinelli P Ann Ital Chir; 1993; 64(6):583-9. PubMed ID: 8080153 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Staging of esophageal carcinoma in vitro with 4.7-T MR imaging. Yamada I; Murata Y; Izumi Y; Kawano T; Endo M; Kuroiwa T; Shibuya H Radiology; 1997 Aug; 204(2):521-6. PubMed ID: 9240547 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison between high-field-strength MR imaging and CT for screening of hepatic metastases: a receiver operating characteristic analysis. Rummeny EJ; Wernecke K; Saini S; Vassallo P; Wiesmann W; Oestmann JW; Kivelitz D; Reers B; Reiser MF; Peters PE Radiology; 1992 Mar; 182(3):879-86. PubMed ID: 1535912 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Role of computed tomography in preoperative evaluation of esophageal carcinoma. Sharma OP; Chandermohan ; Mashankar AS; Ganguly M; Sarangi L; Patange VB; Moorjani VK Indian J Cancer; 1994 Mar; 31(1):12-8. PubMed ID: 8063330 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Esophageal ultrasound and the preoperative staging of carcinoma of the esophagus. Rice TW; Boyce GA; Sivak MV J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1991 Mar; 101(3):536-43; discussion 543-4. PubMed ID: 1999948 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [The inadequacy of computed tomography for the assessment of patients with esophageal carcinomas after neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy]. Bautz W Strahlenther Onkol; 2000 Feb; 176(2):95. PubMed ID: 10697657 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Ultra-high-resolution MR imaging of esophageal carcinoma at ultra-high field strength (7.0T) ex vivo: correlation with histopathologic findings. Yamada I; Miyasaka N; Hikishima K; Tokairin Y; Kawano T; Ito E; Kobayashi D; Eishi Y; Okano H Magn Reson Imaging; 2015 May; 33(4):413-9. PubMed ID: 25645396 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Imaging of pancreatic neoplasms: comparison of MR and CT. Steiner E; Stark DD; Hahn PF; Saini S; Simeone JF; Mueller PR; Wittenberg J; Ferrucci JT AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1989 Mar; 152(3):487-91. PubMed ID: 2783801 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Vessel probe CT protocol in the study of esophageal carcinoma: can it improve preoperative T staging? Moschetta M; Ianora AA; Marzullo A; Scardapane A; Angelelli G Eur J Surg Oncol; 2010 Jul; 36(7):663-9. PubMed ID: 20627648 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. MR imaging of head and neck tumors: comparison of T1-weighted contrast-enhanced fat-suppressed images with conventional T2-weighted and fast spin-echo T2-weighted images. Ross MR; Schomer DF; Chappell P; Enzmann DR AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Jul; 163(1):173-8. PubMed ID: 8010208 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity: MR findings and value of T1-versus T2-weighted fast spin-echo images. Yasumoto M; Shibuya H; Takeda M; Korenaga T AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Apr; 164(4):981-7. PubMed ID: 7726062 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Clinical implication of PET/MR imaging in preoperative esophageal cancer staging: comparison with PET/CT, endoscopic ultrasonography, and CT. Lee G; I H; Kim SJ; Jeong YJ; Kim IJ; Pak K; Park DY; Kim GH J Nucl Med; 2014 Aug; 55(8):1242-7. PubMed ID: 24868109 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Hepatic metastases studied with MR and CT. Heiken JP; Lee JK; Glazer HS; Ling D Radiology; 1985 Aug; 156(2):423-7. PubMed ID: 4011905 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]