These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Lateral eyes or lateralized? Hemiretinal and ocular dominance effects on visual field asymmetries for the lexical decision task. Church KL; Chiarello C Brain Cogn; 1988 Oct; 8(2):227-39. PubMed ID: 3196485 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Visual-field asymmetries in letter recognition: evidence for asymmetry in early visual registration. Pitblado C; Petrides M; Riccio G Percept Mot Skills; 1979 Aug; 49(1):183-91. PubMed ID: 503735 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The lateralization of hemispheric function in the recognition of Chinese characters. Zhang WT; Peng RX Neuropsychologia; 1983; 21(6):679-82. PubMed ID: 6664486 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Phonological encoding and ideographic reading by the disconnected right hemisphere: two case studies. Zaidel E; Peters AM Brain Lang; 1981 Nov; 14(2):205-34. PubMed ID: 7306782 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Hemispheric differences for semantically and phonologically primed nouns: a tachistoscopic study in normals. Rodel M; Dudley JG; Bourdeau M Percept Psychophys; 1983 Dec; 34(6):523-31. PubMed ID: 6664807 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Left and right visual field superiority for letter classification. Jonides J Q J Exp Psychol; 1979 Aug; 31(3):423-39. PubMed ID: 504547 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Stroop interference in the left and right visual fields. Tsao Y; Feustel T; Soseos C Brain Lang; 1979 Nov; 8(3):367-71. PubMed ID: 509204 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Fixation accuracy and perceptual asymmetry for consonants. Berger JM; Perret E Percept Mot Skills; 1988 Apr; 66(2):569-70. PubMed ID: 3399335 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Building higher-order units in tachistoscopic identification: a test of two models. Wolff P; Mewhort DJ Psychol Res; 1986; 48(2):79-85. PubMed ID: 3774921 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Differential effects of concurrent letters on visual field differences in letter recognition. Hatta T Int J Neurosci; 1982 Sep; 17(2):129-34. PubMed ID: 7166476 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A directional bias for studies of laterality. Alter I; Rein S; Toro A Neuropsychologia; 1989; 27(2):251-7. PubMed ID: 2927635 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Age of reading acquisition does not affect visual hemifield asymmetries for naming imageable nouns. Young AW; Bion PJ; Ellis AW Cortex; 1982 Oct; 18(3):477-82. PubMed ID: 7151456 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effects of type of center fixation stimulus on visual-field preferences: a preliminary study. Moore WH; Snow KA Percept Mot Skills; 1983 Oct; 57(2):363-6. PubMed ID: 6634317 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The nature of the task-stimulus interaction in the tachistoscopic recognition of kana and kanji words. Sasanuma S; Itoh M; Kobayashi Y; Mori K Brain Lang; 1980 Mar; 9(2):298-306. PubMed ID: 7363073 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Sources of visual field interference in children and adults. Miller LK J Exp Child Psychol; 1984 Feb; 37(1):141-57. PubMed ID: 6707574 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]