These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4023305)

  • 1. [Cardiac complications of intravenous digital angiography. Comparison of ionic and nonionic contrast media].
    Stacul F; Marass P; Pozzi Mucelli R; Predonzan F; Magnaldi S; Abbona M
    Radiol Med; 1985; 71(1-2):40-3. PubMed ID: 4023305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of ionic and nonionic contrast media on bradyarrhythmia during coronary angiography: a comparison of Renografin-76, Hypaque-76, and Isovue-370.
    Piao ZE; Hwang MH; Murdock DK; Loeb HS; Scanlon PJ
    J Lab Clin Med; 1990 Jan; 115(1):122-7. PubMed ID: 2299252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Excretory urography--current indications of the status of a conventional diagnostic method. Status of nonionic and ionic contrast media].
    Porst H; Mayer R
    Fortschr Med; 1985 Aug; 103(30):755-8. PubMed ID: 4043912
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparison of iopamidol and diatrizoate in peripheral angiography.
    Fletcher EW
    Br J Radiol; 1982 Jan; 55(649):36-8. PubMed ID: 7032637
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Nephrotoxicity of high and low osmolar contrast media: case control studies following digital subtraction angiography in potential risk patients.
    Scherberich JE; Fischer A; Rautschka E; Kollath J; Riemann H
    Fortschr Geb Rontgenstrahlen Nuklearmed Erganzungsbd; 1989; 128():91-4. PubMed ID: 2568816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cardiac complications of intravenous digital subtraction angiography.
    Neergaard K; Galløe AM; Dirksen KL; Andersen I; Madsen EB
    Eur J Radiol; 1989 May; 9(2):105-7. PubMed ID: 2663487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Contrast media induced pulmonary edema. Comparison of ionic and nonionic agents in an animal model.
    Måre K; Violante M; Zack A
    Invest Radiol; 1984; 19(6):566-9. PubMed ID: 6511265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Iopamidol arteriography: discomfort and pain.
    Dotter CT; Rösch J; Erlandson M; Buschman RW; Ogilvie R
    Radiology; 1985 Jun; 155(3):819-21. PubMed ID: 3890014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Contrast media in venous digital angiography: ionic or non-ionic?].
    Stacul F; Magnaldi S; Pozzi-Mucelli R; Muner G; Dalla Palma L
    Radiol Med; 1986 Nov; 72(11):815-22. PubMed ID: 3786845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Renal and hepatic tolerance of nonionic and ionic contrast media in intravenous digital subtraction angiography.
    Langer M; Junge W; Keysser R; Hasford J; Jänicke UA
    Fortschr Geb Rontgenstrahlen Nuklearmed Erganzungsbd; 1989; 128():95-100. PubMed ID: 2568817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Comparison of the electrocardiographic changes resulting from Urografin 76 and Iopamidol (Solutrast 370) during coronary angiography].
    Wagner J; Werner-Schlenska H
    Rofo; 1984 Jul; 141(1):100-4. PubMed ID: 6431505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Contrast agent nephrotoxicity: comparison of ionic and nonionic contrast agents.
    Stacul F; Carraro M; Magnaldi S; Faccini L; Guarnieri G; Dalla Palma L
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1987 Dec; 149(6):1287-9. PubMed ID: 2891285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Pulmonary angiography with iopamidol and Renografin 76 in normal and pulmonary hypertensive dogs.
    Thompson WM; Mills SR; Bates M; Hedlund L; Rommel J
    Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh); 1983; 24(5):425-31. PubMed ID: 6666667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Clinical superiority of a new nonionic contrast agent (iopamidol) for cardiac angiography.
    Gertz EW; Wisneski JA; Chiu D; Akin JR; Hu C
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 1985 Feb; 5(2 Pt 1):250-8. PubMed ID: 3881496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Extravascular lung water: effects of intravenous ionic and non-ionic (lopamidol) contrast media during ischemia.
    Slutsky RA; Strich G
    Radiology; 1985 Apr; 155(1):11-4. PubMed ID: 3883412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of histamine release effects of ionic and non-ionic radiographic contrast media.
    Salem DN; Findlay SR; Isner JM; Konstam MA; Cohen PF
    Am J Med; 1986 Mar; 80(3):382-4. PubMed ID: 2420176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Iopamidol and meglumine diatrizoate: comparison of effects on patient discomfort during aortofemoral arteriography.
    Widrich WC; Beckman CF; Robbins AH; Scholz FJ; Srinivasan MK; Hayes EJ; Kellum CD; Newman T
    Radiology; 1983 Jul; 148(1):61-4. PubMed ID: 6344138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Iopamidol: a non-ionic contrast agent for peripheral arteriography.
    Widrich WC; Robbins AH; Rommel AJ; Andrews R
    Radiology; 1982 Oct; 145(1):53-5. PubMed ID: 7122896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Comparison between ionic and non ionic contrast media in fast injection nephro-urography (author's transl)].
    Dalla Palma L; Rossi M; Stacul F; Agostini R
    Radiol Med; 1981; 67(1-2):55-60. PubMed ID: 7268075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Excretion of contrast media by the immature rabbit. Comparison of Renografin and Iopamidol.
    Rosenbaum DM; Caldicott WJ
    Invest Radiol; 1984; 19(2):123-8. PubMed ID: 6533102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.