These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
99 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4023475)
1. Comparison of ascertainment-bias correction schemes for pedigrees ascertained through multiple probands. Majumder PP Stat Med; 1985; 4(2):163-73. PubMed ID: 4023475 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Ascertainment correction for Markov chain Monte Carlo segregation and linkage analysis of a quantitative trait. Ma J; Amos CI; Warwick Daw E Genet Epidemiol; 2007 Sep; 31(6):594-604. PubMed ID: 17487893 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Inherent intractability of the ascertainment problem for pedigree data: a general likelihood framework. Vieland VJ; Hodge SE Am J Hum Genet; 1995 Jan; 56(1):33-43. PubMed ID: 7825595 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Ascertainment corrections based on smaller family units. Bonney GE Am J Hum Genet; 1998 Oct; 63(4):1202-15. PubMed ID: 9758615 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Monte Carlo estimation of mixed models for large complex pedigrees. Guo SW; Thompson EA Biometrics; 1994 Jun; 50(2):417-32. PubMed ID: 8068842 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Nonrandom sampling in human genetics: familial correlations. Hanis CL; Chakraborty R IMA J Math Appl Med Biol; 1984; 1(2):193-213. PubMed ID: 6600103 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Ascertainment and goodness of fit of variance component models for pedigree data. Boehnke M; Lange K Prog Clin Biol Res; 1984; 147():173-92. PubMed ID: 6547532 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Correcting for nonrandom ascertainment in generalized linear mixed models (GLMMs), fitted using Gibbs sampling. Burton PR Genet Epidemiol; 2003 Jan; 24(1):24-35. PubMed ID: 12508253 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Monte Carlo estimation of variance component models for large complex pedigrees. Guo SW; Thompson EA IMA J Math Appl Med Biol; 1991; 8(3):171-89. PubMed ID: 1823089 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The effects of conditioning on probands to correct for multiple ascertainment. Boehnke M; Greenberg DA Am J Hum Genet; 1984 Nov; 36(6):1298-308. PubMed ID: 6517053 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The effect of proband designation on segregation analysis. Greenberg DA Am J Hum Genet; 1986 Sep; 39(3):329-39. PubMed ID: 3766539 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Screening and replication using the same data set: testing strategies for family-based studies in which all probands are affected. Murphy A; Weiss ST; Lange C PLoS Genet; 2008 Sep; 4(9):e1000197. PubMed ID: 18802462 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A two-stage approach to the correction of ascertainment bias in complex genetic studies involving variance components. Bowden J; Thompson JR; Burton PR Ann Hum Genet; 2007 Mar; 71(Pt 2):220-9. PubMed ID: 17354286 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]