These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Reliability and validity of judgments of sound quality in elderly hearing aid wearers. Narendran MM; Humes LE Ear Hear; 2003 Feb; 24(1):4-11. PubMed ID: 12598808 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Satisfaction with fitted hearing aids. I. An analysis of technical information. Kapteyn TS Scand Audiol; 1977; 6(3):147-56. PubMed ID: 929092 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. In-the-ear hearing aids. The use and benefit in the elderly hearing-impaired. Henrichsen J; Noring E; Christensen B; Pedersen F; Parving A Scand Audiol; 1988; 17(4):209-12. PubMed ID: 3232021 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A comparison of sound quality judgments for monaural and binaural hearing aid processed stimuli. Balfour PB; Hawkins DB Ear Hear; 1992 Oct; 13(5):331-9. PubMed ID: 1487093 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Personality, hearing problems, and amplification characteristics: contributions to self-report hearing aid outcomes. Cox RM; Alexander GC; Gray GA Ear Hear; 2007 Apr; 28(2):141-62. PubMed ID: 17496667 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of the CAM2 and NAL-NL2 hearing aid fitting methods. Moore BC; Sęk A Ear Hear; 2013; 34(1):83-95. PubMed ID: 22878351 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The selection and validation of output sound pressure level in multichannel hearing aids. Preminger JE; Neuman AC; Cunningham DR Ear Hear; 2001 Dec; 22(6):487-500. PubMed ID: 11770671 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Patients' attitudes to the bone-anchored hearing aid. Results of a questionnaire study. Tjellström A; Jacobsson M; Norvell B; Albrektsson T Scand Audiol; 1989; 18(2):119-23. PubMed ID: 2756333 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Manual dexterity and successful hearing aid use. Kumar M; Hickey S; Shaw S J Laryngol Otol; 2000 Aug; 114(8):593-7. PubMed ID: 11027048 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Further clinical experiences with middle-ear implantable hearing aids: indications and sound quality evaluation. Suzuki J; Kodera K; Suzuki M; Ashikawa H ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 1989; 51(4):229-34. PubMed ID: 2748142 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of two hearing aid receiver-amplifier combinations using sound quality judgments. Palmer CV; Killion MC; Wilber LA; Ballad WJ Ear Hear; 1995 Dec; 16(6):587-98. PubMed ID: 8747808 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Using conjoint analysis to examine the importance of hearing aid attributes. Meister H; Lausberg I; Walger M; von Wedel H Ear Hear; 2001 Apr; 22(2):142-50. PubMed ID: 11324843 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effects of multi-channel compression time constants on subjectively perceived sound quality and speech intelligibility. Hansen M Ear Hear; 2002 Aug; 23(4):369-80. PubMed ID: 12195179 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Hearing aid fine-tuning based on Dutch descriptions. Thielemans T; Pans D; Chenault M; Anteunis L Int J Audiol; 2017 Jul; 56(7):507-515. PubMed ID: 28635499 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A prospective multi-centre study of the benefits of bilateral hearing aids. Boymans M; Goverts ST; Kramer SE; Festen JM; Dreschler WA Ear Hear; 2008 Dec; 29(6):930-41. PubMed ID: 18998242 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Hearing aid evaluation based on measures of benefit, use, and satisfaction. Oja GL; Schow RL Ear Hear; 1984; 5(2):77-86. PubMed ID: 6724175 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [The use of the self-assessment questionnaire to evaluate hearing aid benefit]. de Almeida K; Taguchi CK Pro Fono; 2004; 16(1):101-10. PubMed ID: 15109113 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]