These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
45. Objective evidence for phase-independent spatial frequency analysis in the human visual pathway. Regan D; Regan MP Vision Res; 1988; 28(1):187-91. PubMed ID: 3413995 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Luminance mechanisms mediate the motion of red-green isoluminant gratings: the role of "temporal chromatic aberration". Mullen KT; Yoshizawa T; Baker CL Vision Res; 2003 May; 43(11):1235-47. PubMed ID: 12726830 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Spatial masking does not reveal mechanisms selective to combined luminance and red-green color. Stromeyer CF; Thabet R; Chaparro A; Kronauer RE Vision Res; 1999 Jun; 39(12):2099-112. PubMed ID: 10343793 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. A comparison of contrast detection and discrimination. Bradley A; Ohzawa I Vision Res; 1986; 26(6):991-7. PubMed ID: 3750880 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Detection and direction discrimination performance with flicker gratings in peripheral vision. McCarthy J; Pantle A; Pinkus A Vision Res; 1994 Mar; 34(6):763-73. PubMed ID: 8160392 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Opponent model for line interval discrimination: interval and vernier performance compared. Morgan MJ; Regan D Vision Res; 1987; 27(1):107-18. PubMed ID: 3617541 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Dissociation of orientation discrimination from form detection for motion-defined bars and luminance-defined bars: effects of dot lifetime and presentation duration. Regan D; Hamstra SJ Vision Res; 1992 Sep; 32(9):1655-66. PubMed ID: 1455737 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Changes in spatial resolution for pattern and movement detection in clinical cases. MacCana F; Kulikowski JJ; Bhargava SK Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1983; 3(1):47-54. PubMed ID: 6866522 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Relation between flicker and two-pulse sensitivities for sinusoidal gratings. Ohtani Y; Ejima Y Vision Res; 1988; 28(1):145-56. PubMed ID: 3413991 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
54. Spatial contrast sensitivity of the tree shrew. Petry HM; Fox R; Casagrande VA Vision Res; 1984; 24(9):1037-42. PubMed ID: 6506467 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Detecting low shape-frequencies in smooth and jagged contours. Prins N; Kingdom FA; Hayes A Vision Res; 2007 Aug; 47(18):2390-402. PubMed ID: 17651781 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Comparing contrast-modulated and luminance-modulated masking: effects of spatial frequency and phase. Willis A; Smallman HS; Harris JM Perception; 2000; 29(1):81-100. PubMed ID: 10820593 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Facilitation and masking of briefly presented gratings: time-course and contrast dependence. Georgeson MA; Georgeson JM Vision Res; 1987; 27(3):369-79. PubMed ID: 3660598 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Effects of luminance contrast and phase difference on motion assimilation for sinusoidal gratings. Ohtani Y; Ido K; Ejima Y Vision Res; 1995 Aug; 35(16):2277-86. PubMed ID: 7571464 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Spatiotemporal contrast sensitivity and visual field locus. Wright MJ; Johnston A Vision Res; 1983; 23(10):983-9. PubMed ID: 6649443 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Spatial frequency effects in masking by light. Green M Vision Res; 1981; 21(6):861-6. PubMed ID: 7314463 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]