179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4024478)
1. Eccentricity-dependent scaling of the limits for short-range apparent motion perception.
Baker CL; Braddick OJ
Vision Res; 1985; 25(6):803-12. PubMed ID: 4024478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Masking of low frequency information in short-range apparent motion.
Cleary R; Braddick OJ
Vision Res; 1990; 30(2):317-27. PubMed ID: 2309465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Displacement limits for spatial frequency filtered random-dot cinematograms in apparent motion.
Chang JJ; Julesz B
Vision Res; 1983; 23(12):1379-85. PubMed ID: 6666038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Modeling a space-variant cortical representation for apparent motion.
Wurbs J; Mingolla E; Yazdanbakhsh A
J Vis; 2013 Aug; 13(10):. PubMed ID: 23922444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Beyond the displacement limit: an analysis of short-range processes in apparent motion.
Bischof WF; Groner M
Vision Res; 1985; 25(6):839-47. PubMed ID: 4024482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Direction discrimination for band-pass filtered random dot kinematograms.
Cleary R; Braddick OJ
Vision Res; 1990; 30(2):303-16. PubMed ID: 2309464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Displacement limits, directional anisotropy and direction versus form discrimination in random-dot cinematograms.
Chang JJ; Julesz B
Vision Res; 1983; 23(6):639-46. PubMed ID: 6613004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Motion detection is dependent on spatial frequency not size.
Boulton JC; Baker CL
Vision Res; 1991; 31(1):77-87. PubMed ID: 2006556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Perceiving heading with different retinal regions and types of optic flow.
Crowell JA; Banks MS
Percept Psychophys; 1993 Mar; 53(3):325-37. PubMed ID: 8483696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Anisotropy for direction discrimination in a two-frame apparent motion display.
Ohtani Y; Ejima Y
Vision Res; 1997 Mar; 37(6):765-7. PubMed ID: 9156221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The temporal range of motion sensing and motion perception.
Georgeson MA; Harris MG
Vision Res; 1990; 30(4):615-9. PubMed ID: 2339514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The distribution of human motion detector properties in the monocular visual field.
van de Grind WA; Koenderink JJ; van Doorn AJ
Vision Res; 1986; 26(5):797-810. PubMed ID: 3750861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The effects of spatiotemporal integration on maximum displacement thresholds for the detection of coherent motion.
Todd JT; Norman JF
Vision Res; 1995 Aug; 35(16):2287-302. PubMed ID: 7571465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effects of movement in the background field on long-range apparent motion.
Finlay DC; Manning ML; Neill RA; Fenelon B
Vision Res; 1987; 27(9):1679-82. PubMed ID: 3445497
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Propagation of local motion correspondence.
Watanabe T; Cole R
Vision Res; 1995 Oct; 35(20):2853-61. PubMed ID: 8533325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A puzzling percept of stimulus stabilization.
Mesland BS; Wertheim AH
Vision Res; 1996 Oct; 36(20):3325-8. PubMed ID: 8944290
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A moving display which opposes short-range and long-range signals.
Mather G; Cavanagh P; Anstis SM
Perception; 1985; 14(2):163-6. PubMed ID: 4069946
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Matching velocity in central and peripheral vision.
Johnston A; Wright MJ
Vision Res; 1986; 26(7):1099-109. PubMed ID: 3798745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The effects of eccentricity and retinal illuminance on the illusory motion seen in a stationary luminance gradient.
Hisakata R; Murakami I
Vision Res; 2008 Sep; 48(19):1940-8. PubMed ID: 18625266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Spatial scaling of illusory motion perceived in a static figure.
Hisakata R; Murakami I
J Vis; 2018 Dec; 18(13):15. PubMed ID: 30577042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
