These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4026120)
1. Multiview videoendoscopic evaluation of velopharyngeal physiology in 15 normal speakers. Karnell MP; Morris HL Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 1985; 94(4 Pt 1):361-5. PubMed ID: 4026120 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Nasal endoscopy--a method for objective assessment of velopharyngeal closure]. Hemprich A; Eggeling V; Becker R Dtsch Z Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir; 1984; 8(6):461-4. PubMed ID: 6598095 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Velopharyngeal physiology after pharyngeal flap surgery as assessed by oral endoscopy. Zwitman DH Cleft Palate J; 1982 Jan; 19(1):36-9. PubMed ID: 6948630 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Oral endoscopic comparison of velopharyngeal closure before and after pharyngeal flap surgery. Zwitman DH Cleft Palate J; 1982 Jan; 19(1):40-6. PubMed ID: 6948631 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Velopharyngeal anthropometric analysis with MRI in normal subjects. Akgüner M Ann Plast Surg; 1999 Aug; 43(2):142-7. PubMed ID: 10454319 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A cephalometric study of the stability of the base of the pharyngeal flap following a modified 'unified velopharyngoplasty procedure'. Satoh K; Wada T; Tachimura T; Hara H; Sakoda S; Shiba R J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 1999 Dec; 27(6):358-63; discussion 364. PubMed ID: 10870754 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Standardization of the data reported in nasopharyngeal and fluoroscopy study of the velopharyngeal sphincter]. Hernández López X; Márquez Avila C; Romero Fernández F; Tarasco Michel M; Ysunza Rivera A; Tarasco Camino S; Meca y Sen M; Perez Contreras RB; Puente Gonzalez A Gac Med Mex; 1993; 129(1):27-33. PubMed ID: 8063074 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The use of videonasopharyngoscopy for biofeedback therapy in adults after pharyngeal flap surgery. Witzel MA; Tobe J; Salyer KE Cleft Palate J; 1989 Apr; 26(2):129-34; discussion 135. PubMed ID: 2706782 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Digital, labial, and velopharyngeal reaction times in normal speakers. Dalston RM; Keefe MJ Cleft Palate J; 1988 Jul; 25(3):203-9. PubMed ID: 3168264 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Nasal air flow during normal speech production. Thompson AE; Hixon TJ Cleft Palate J; 1979 Oct; 16(4):412-20. PubMed ID: 290432 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparison of photodetector and endoscopic evaluations of velopharyngeal function. Karnell MP; Seaver EJ; Dalston RM J Speech Hear Res; 1988 Sep; 31(3):503-10. PubMed ID: 3172770 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Study of the normal and insufficient velopharyngeal valve by the "Forced Sucking Test". Finkelstein Y; Talmi YP; Kravitz K; Bar-Ziv J; Nachmani A; Hauben DJ; Zohar Y Laryngoscope; 1991 Nov; 101(11):1203-12. PubMed ID: 1943421 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The aerodynamic characteristics of speech produced by normal speakers and cleft palate speakers with adequate velopharyngeal function. Dalston RM; Warren DW; Smith LR Cleft Palate J; 1990 Oct; 27(4):393-9; discussion 400-1. PubMed ID: 2253387 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of velopharyngeal closure by 4D imaging using 320-detector-row computed tomography. Sakamoto Y; Soga S; Jinzaki M; Yamada Y; Ogata H; Kishi K J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2015 Apr; 68(4):479-84. PubMed ID: 25649217 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Partitioning model nasal airway resistance into its nasal cavity and velopharyngeal components. Smith BE; Fiala KJ; Guyette TW Cleft Palate J; 1989 Oct; 26(4):327-30; discussion 331. PubMed ID: 2805351 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]