These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4026278)

  • 1. Stimulus range influences intensity and hedonic ratings of flavour.
    McBride RL
    Appetite; 1985 Jun; 6(2):125-31. PubMed ID: 4026278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Taste intensity and hedonic responses to simple beverages in gastrointestinal cancer patients.
    Bossola M; Cadoni G; Bellantone R; Carriero C; Carriero E; Ottaviani F; Borzomati D; Tortorelli A; Doglietto GB
    J Pain Symptom Manage; 2007 Nov; 34(5):505-12. PubMed ID: 17616339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Addition of a visual cue to rice increases perceived flavour intensity but not liking.
    Hartley L; Russell CG; Liem DG
    Food Res Int; 2021 Jan; 139():109922. PubMed ID: 33509489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Taste perception of sodium chloride in suprathreshold concentration related to essential hypertension.
    Barylko-Pikielna N; Zawadzka L; Niegowska J; Cybulska I; Sznajderman M
    J Hypertens Suppl; 1985 Dec; 3(3):S449-52. PubMed ID: 2856763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of body weight and food intake on pleasantness ratings for a sweet stimulus.
    Thompson DA; Moskowitz HR; Campbell RG
    J Appl Physiol; 1976 Jul; 41(1):77-83. PubMed ID: 972136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Taste perception and implicit attitude toward sweet related to body mass index and soft drink supplementation.
    Sartor F; Donaldson LF; Markland DA; Loveday H; Jackson MJ; Kubis HP
    Appetite; 2011 Aug; 57(1):237-46. PubMed ID: 21600942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of the hedonic general Labeled Magnitude Scale with the hedonic 9-point scale.
    Kalva JJ; Sims CA; Puentes LA; Snyder DJ; Bartoshuk LM
    J Food Sci; 2014 Feb; 79(2):S238-45. PubMed ID: 24422940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The relationship between salt intake and preferences for different salt levels in soup.
    Shepherd R; Farleigh CA; Land DG
    Appetite; 1984 Dec; 5(4):281-90. PubMed ID: 6529257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sensory-specific satiety is unaffected by manipulations of flavour intensity.
    Havermans RC; Geschwind N; Filla S; Nederkoorn C; Jansen A
    Physiol Behav; 2009 Jun; 97(3-4):327-33. PubMed ID: 19269299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison times are longer for hedonic than for intensity judgements of taste stimuli.
    Veldhuizen MG; Vessaz MN; Kroeze JH
    Physiol Behav; 2005 Mar; 84(3):489-95. PubMed ID: 15763588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Elevated sweet taste pleasantness ratings in bulimia nervosa.
    Franko DL; Wolfe BE; Jimerson DC
    Physiol Behav; 1994 Nov; 56(5):969-73. PubMed ID: 7824599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Optimizing the sensory characteristics and acceptance of canned cat food: use of a human taste panel.
    Pickering GJ
    J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr (Berl); 2009 Feb; 93(1):52-60. PubMed ID: 19386008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Ratings of pleasantness and intensity for beverages served in containers congruent and incongruent with expectancy.
    Raudenbush B; Meyer B; Eppich W; Corley N; Petterson S
    Percept Mot Skills; 2002 Apr; 94(2):671-4. PubMed ID: 12027363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sensory evaluations of fat-sucrose and fat-salt mixtures: relationship to age and weight status.
    Warwick ZS; Schiffman SS
    Physiol Behav; 1990 Nov; 48(5):633-6. PubMed ID: 2082362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Sweet liking in patients with Parkinson's disease.
    Sienkiewicz-Jarosz H; Scinska A; Swiecicki L; Lipczynska-Lojkowska W; Kuran W; Ryglewicz D; Kolaczkowski M; Samochowiec J; Bienkowski P
    J Neurol Sci; 2013 Jun; 329(1-2):17-22. PubMed ID: 23561981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Psychophysical and psychohedonic functions of four common food flavours in elderly subjects.
    de Graaf C; van Staveren W; Burema J
    Chem Senses; 1996 Jun; 21(3):293-302. PubMed ID: 8670708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Liking and exposure: first, second and tenth time around.
    Frøst MB
    Physiol Behav; 2006 Aug; 89(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 16574169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Flavour liking and preference conditioned by caffeine in humans.
    Yeomans MR; Durlach PJ; Tinley EM
    Q J Exp Psychol B; 2005 Jan; 58(1):47-58. PubMed ID: 15844377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Acquired hedonic and sensory characteristics of odours: influence of sweet liker and propylthiouracil taster status.
    Yeomans MR; Prescott J; Gould NJ
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Aug; 62(8):1648-64. PubMed ID: 19180363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Expression of flavour preferences conditioned by caffeine is dependent on caffeine deprivation state.
    Yeomans MR; Jackson A; Lee MD; Nesic J; Durlach PJ
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 2000 Jun; 150(2):208-15. PubMed ID: 10907674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.