BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

185 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4026729)

  • 1. Divergent selection of chickens for antibody response to sheep erythrocytes: kinetics of primary and secondary immunizations.
    Ubosi CO; Dunnington EA; Gross WB; Siegel PB
    Avian Dis; 1985; 29(2):347-55. PubMed ID: 4026729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Divergent selection of chickens for antibody production to sheep erythrocytes: age effect in parental lines and their crosses.
    Ubosi CO; Gross WB; Siegel PB
    Avian Dis; 1985; 29(1):150-8. PubMed ID: 3985872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Diet and humoral responsiveness of lines of chickens divergently selected for antibody response to sheep red blood cells.
    Boa-Amponsem K; Dunnington EA; Siegel PB
    Avian Dis; 1998; 42(3):565-71. PubMed ID: 9777157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Antibody transmitting ability of hens from lines of chickens differing in response to SRBC antigen.
    Boa-Amponsem K; Dunnington EA; Siegel PB
    Br Poult Sci; 1997 Dec; 38(5):480-4. PubMed ID: 9510990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Inheritance of antibody response to sheep erythrocytes in lines of chickens divergently selected for fifty-six-day body weight and their crosses.
    Miller LL; Siegel PB; Dunnington EA
    Poult Sci; 1992 Jan; 71(1):47-52. PubMed ID: 1539022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of route of inoculation on humoral immune response of White Leghorn chickens selected for high or low antibody response to sheep red blood cells.
    Boa-Amponsem K; Price SE; Dunnington EA; Siegel PB
    Poult Sci; 2001 Aug; 80(8):1073-8. PubMed ID: 11495457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Divergent antibody responses to vaccines and divergent body weights of chicken lines selected for high and low humoral responsiveness to sheep red blood cells.
    Parmentier HK; Nieuwland MG; Rijke E; De Vries Reilingh G; Schrama JW
    Avian Dis; 1996; 40(3):634-44. PubMed ID: 8883795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The immune response of the chick following viral vaccinations and immunization with sheep red blood cells.
    van der Zijpp AJ; Rooyakkers JM; Kouwenhoven B
    Avian Dis; 1982; 26(1):97-106. PubMed ID: 6284114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Interference with the humoral immune response in diverse genetic lines of chickens. II. The effect of colloidal carbon.
    Van der Zijpp AJ; Scott TR; Glick B; Kreukniet MB
    Vet Immunol Immunopathol; 1989 Nov; 23(1-2):187-94. PubMed ID: 2515649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of antigen dosage on early localization of specific antibodies in rat splenic germinal centers.
    Steven WM
    Anat Rec; 1980 Nov; 198(3):503-11. PubMed ID: 7457940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Class differences in the antibody response of HLC and LLC mice to sheep red blood cells.
    Silver DM; Chai CK
    J Immunol; 1975 Aug; 115(2):462-5. PubMed ID: 1097515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Antibody responses to different dosages of sheep red blood cells in lines of chickens selected for high and low antibody response to sheep red blood cells.
    Boa-Amponsem K; Dunnington EA; Pierson FW; Larsen CT; Siegel PB
    Poult Sci; 2000 Feb; 79(2):159-62. PubMed ID: 10735741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Direct and correlated response to divergent selection for serum immunoglobulin M and G levels in chickens.
    Sarker N; Tsudzuki M; Nishibori M; Yamamoto Y
    Poult Sci; 1999 Jan; 78(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 10023739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Modulation of secondary antibody response in SRBC-immunized mice by lysozyme dimer.
    Obmińska-Domoradzka B; Switała M; Debowy J
    Immunopharmacol Immunotoxicol; 1997 Nov; 19(4):489-98. PubMed ID: 9436048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Antibody responses of hens fed vitamin E and passively acquired antibodies of their chicks.
    Boa-Amponsem K; Price SE; Geraert PA; Picard M; Siegel PB
    Avian Dis; 2001; 45(1):122-7. PubMed ID: 11332472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Interference with the humoral immune response in diverse genetic lines of chickens. I. The effect of carrageenan.
    Van der Zijpp AJ; Scott TR; Glick B; Kreukniet MB
    Vet Immunol Immunopathol; 1988 Dec; 20(1):53-60. PubMed ID: 3149069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Memory antibody responses of broiler and leghorn chickens as influenced by dietary vitamin E and route of sheep red blood cell administration.
    Boa-Amponsem K; Picard M; Blair ME; Meldrum B; Siegel PB
    Poult Sci; 2006 Feb; 85(2):173-7. PubMed ID: 16523610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Differences in the genetic control of primary and secondary antibody responses.
    Sant'anna OA; Bouthillier Y; Siqueira M; Biozzi G
    Immunology; 1979 Aug; 37(4):849-56. PubMed ID: 115781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Antibody response of chickens to sheep red blood cells: crosses among divergently selected lines and relaxed sublines.
    Kuehn LA; Price SE; Honaker CF; Siegel PB
    Poult Sci; 2006 Aug; 85(8):1338-41. PubMed ID: 16903462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of exogenous prolactin on immunity in chickens.
    Sotowska-Brochocka J; Rosołowska-Huszcz D; Skwarło-Sońta K; Gajewska A
    Res Vet Sci; 1984 Jul; 37(1):123-5. PubMed ID: 6473910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.