These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4027052)

  • 21. Feature similarity and laterality effects in visual masking.
    Hellige JB
    Neuropsychologia; 1983; 21(6):633-9. PubMed ID: 6664482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Influence of cognitive style and interstimulus interval on the hemispheric processing of tactile stimuli.
    Minagawa N; Kashu K
    Percept Mot Skills; 1989 Jun; 68(3 Pt 2):1031-9. PubMed ID: 2762069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Analysis of sequential letter matching tasks utilising lateralised tachistoscopic presentation.
    McCarthy RA; Beaumont JG
    Cortex; 1983 Apr; 19(1):79-98. PubMed ID: 6851594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Independent functioning of the two cerebral hemispheres for recognizing bilaterally presented tachistoscopic visual-half-field stimuli.
    Hines D
    Cortex; 1975 Jun; 11(2):132-43. PubMed ID: 1149472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Perceptual interference and hemispheric specialization.
    Hines D; Glista J; Byers B
    Brain Cogn; 1985 Jan; 4(1):76-89. PubMed ID: 4027057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Sex and hemispheric differences in the recall of verbal and spatial information.
    Kail RV; Siegel AW
    Cortex; 1978 Dec; 14(4):557-63. PubMed ID: 738064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Left hemisphere damage and selective impairment of auditory verbal short-term memory. A case study.
    Basso A; Spinnler H; Vallar G; Zanobio ME
    Neuropsychologia; 1982; 20(3):263-74. PubMed ID: 7121794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Hemisphere-specific processes in letter matching.
    Kirsner K
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1980 Feb; 6(1):167-79. PubMed ID: 6444990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Hemispheric asymmetry in face perception tasks of different cognitive requirement.
    Marzi CA; Tassinari G; Tressoldi PE; Barry C; Grabowska A
    Hum Neurobiol; 1985; 4(1):15-20. PubMed ID: 3997584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Hemispheric differences in memory search.
    Madden DJ; Nebes RD
    Neuropsychologia; 1980; 18(6):665-73. PubMed ID: 7465026
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Lateral differences in schematic face encoding during dual-task performance with increasing levels of difficulty.
    Wilcox T; Kraft RH
    Percept Mot Skills; 1989 Jun; 68(3 Pt 1):767-78. PubMed ID: 2748292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Face recognition: a general or specific right hemisphere capacity?
    Levine SC; Banich MT; Koch-Weser MP
    Brain Cogn; 1988 Dec; 8(3):303-25. PubMed ID: 3214588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Differential hemispheric mediation of nonverbal visual stimuli.
    Patterson K; Bradshaw JL
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1975 Aug; 1(3):246-52. PubMed ID: 1202147
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A controlled investigation of right hemispheric processing enhancement after restricted environmental stimulation (REST) with floatation.
    Raab J; Gruzelier J
    Psychol Med; 1994 May; 24(2):457-62. PubMed ID: 8084940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Clinical relevance of memory performance during Wada is stimulus type dependent.
    Vingerhoets G; Miatton M; Vonck K; Seurinck R; Boon P
    J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry; 2006 Feb; 77(2):272-4. PubMed ID: 16421139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Hemispheric processing differences revealed by differential conditioning and reaction time performance.
    Hellige JB
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 1975 Dec; 104(4):309-26. PubMed ID: 1194859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Hemispheric differences in matching Stroop-type letter stimuli.
    Alivisatos B; Wilding J
    Cortex; 1982 Apr; 18(1):5-21. PubMed ID: 7187633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Hemispheric superiority for recognizing faces depends upon how they are learned.
    Galper RE; Costa L
    Cortex; 1980 Mar; 16(1):21-38. PubMed ID: 7379564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Selective activation effects of concurrent verbal and spatial memory loads in left-handed and right-handed adults.
    Van Strien JW; Bouma A
    Brain Cogn; 1990 Sep; 14(1):81-91. PubMed ID: 2223047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Influence of task and input factors on hemispheric involvement in face processing.
    Sergent J
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1985 Dec; 11(6):846-61. PubMed ID: 2934512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.