These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

99 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 403091)

  • 1. Short-term benefits and costs of U.S. family planning programs, 1970-1975.
    Jaffe FS; Cutright P
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1977; 9(2):77-80. PubMed ID: 403091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The costs and benefits of government expenditures for family planning programs.
    Chamie M; Henshaw SK
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1981; 13(3):117-8, 120-4. PubMed ID: 6788597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Family planning services in the United States.
    Morris L
    Bull Pan Am Health Organ; 1975; 9(2):124-8. PubMed ID: 1156710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Impact of publicly funded contraceptive services on unintended pregnancies and implications for Medicaid expenditures.
    Forrest JD; Samara R
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1996; 28(5):188-95. PubMed ID: 8886761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The impact of publicly funded family planning clinic services on unintended pregnancies and government cost savings.
    Frost JJ; Finer LB; Tapales A
    J Health Care Poor Underserved; 2008 Aug; 19(3):778-96. PubMed ID: 18677070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The effect of Medicaid family planning expansions on unplanned births.
    Lindrooth RC; McCullough JS
    Womens Health Issues; 2007; 17(2):66-74. PubMed ID: 17403463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A formula for the 1970s: estimating need for subsidized family planning services. Commentary: Family planning need and the future of the family planning program.
    Guttmacher AF
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1973; 5(3):175-6. PubMed ID: 4805737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Family planning saves lives and P303 billion for the Philippine government.
    Philippine Legislators' Committee on Population and Development Foundation
    People Count; 1993 Dec; 3(11):1-4. PubMed ID: 12179225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Family planning funding through four federal-state programs, FY 1997.
    Gold RB; Sonfield A
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1999; 31(4):176-81. PubMed ID: 10435216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Return on investment: a fuller assessment of the benefits and cost savings of the US publicly funded family planning program.
    Frost JJ; Sonfield A; Zolna MR; Finer LB
    Milbank Q; 2014 Dec; 92(4):696-749. PubMed ID: 25314928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Economic woes mean cuts to family planning services.
    Contracept Technol Update; 1991 Jul; 12(7):104, 109-10. PubMed ID: 12284064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A cost-benefit analysis of the Mexican Social Security Administration's family planning program.
    Nortman DL; Halvas J; Rabago A
    Stud Fam Plann; 1986; 17(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 3083537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A benefit-cost analysis of family planning services in Iowa.
    Levey LM; Nyman JA; Haugaard J
    Eval Health Prof; 1988 Dec; 11(4):403-24. PubMed ID: 10312809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The impact of family planning clinic programs on adolescent pregnancy.
    Forrest JD; Hermalin AI; Henshaw SK
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1981; 13(3):109-16. PubMed ID: 7250347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Family planning clinic services in the United States, 1981.
    Torres A; Forrest JD
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1983; 15(6):272-8. PubMed ID: 6667733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An ounce of prevention. Is family planning disappearing from the healthcare picture?
    Hirshbein N
    ZPG Report; 1992 Apr; 24(2):7. PubMed ID: 12285223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Direct and indirect financing of family planning programs: project grants and reimbursement mechanisms.
    Shultz CS; Martin ML
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1973; 5(4):202-8. PubMed ID: 4618205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Family planning program effects on the fertility of low-income U.S. women.
    Cutright P; Jaffe FS
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1976; 8(3):100-1, 105-10. PubMed ID: 939283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Public funding for contraceptive, sterilization and abortion services, 1994.
    Sollom T; Gold RB; Saul R
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1996; 28(4):166-73. PubMed ID: 8853282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Another look at the costs and benefits of government expenditures for family planning programs.
    Healy JB; Englander F; Englander V
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1983; 15(6):299-301. PubMed ID: 6421616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.