These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4031249)

  • 21. The intensity-difference limen for 6.5 kHz: an even more severe departure from Weber's law.
    Nizami L
    Percept Psychophys; 2006 Oct; 68(7):1107-12. PubMed ID: 17355035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Auditory intensity discrimination in the chinchilla.
    Saunders SS; Shivapuja BG; Salvi RJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1987 Nov; 82(5):1604-7. PubMed ID: 3693700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Cochlear nerve fiber responses to amplitude-modulated stimuli: variations with spontaneous rate and other response characteristics.
    Cooper NP; Robertson D; Yates GK
    J Neurophysiol; 1993 Jul; 70(1):370-86. PubMed ID: 8395584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Temporal modulation transfer functions obtained using sinusoidal carriers with normally hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Moore BC; Glasberg BR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Aug; 110(2):1067-73. PubMed ID: 11519575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The mid-level hump at 2 kHz.
    Nizami L; Reimer JF; Jesteadt W
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Aug; 112(2):642-53. PubMed ID: 12186044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Intensity resolution and loudness in high-pass noise.
    Schlauch RS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Apr; 95(4):2171-9. PubMed ID: 8201113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Operating ranges and intensity psychophysics for cochlear implants. Implications for speech processing strategies.
    Pfingst BE
    Arch Otolaryngol; 1984 Mar; 110(3):140-4. PubMed ID: 6422915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Intensity discrimination with cochlear implants.
    Pfingst BE; Burnett PA; Sutton D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1983 Apr; 73(4):1283-92. PubMed ID: 6687893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Temporal modulation transfer functions in patients with cochlear implants.
    Shannon RV
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Apr; 91(4 Pt 1):2156-64. PubMed ID: 1597606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Age-related difference in melodic pitch perception is probably mediated by temporal processing: empirical and computational evidence.
    Russo FA; Ives DT; Goy H; Pichora-Fuller MK; Patterson RD
    Ear Hear; 2012; 33(2):177-86. PubMed ID: 22367092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The relationship between frequency selectivity and pitch discrimination: effects of stimulus level.
    Bernstein JG; Oxenham AJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2006 Dec; 120(6):3916-28. PubMed ID: 17225419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Detection of frequency modulation (FM) in the presence of a second FM tone.
    Wilson AS; Hall JW; Grose JH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Sep; 88(3):1333-8. PubMed ID: 2229668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Auditory frequency and intensity discrimination in pigmented rats.
    Syka J; Rybalko N; Brozek G; Jilek M
    Hear Res; 1996 Oct; 100(1-2):107-13. PubMed ID: 8922984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Comparing the effects of age on amplitude modulation and frequency modulation detection.
    Wallaert N; Moore BC; Lorenzi C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Jun; 139(6):3088. PubMed ID: 27369130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Intensity discrimination of pulsed tones by the goldfish (Carassius auratus).
    Fay RR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Jan; 85(1):500-2. PubMed ID: 2921423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Influence of stimulation rate and loudness growth on modulation detection and intensity discrimination in cochlear implant users.
    Galvin JJ; Fu QJ
    Hear Res; 2009 Apr; 250(1-2):46-54. PubMed ID: 19450432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Development of absolute thresholds in chickens.
    Gray L; Rubel EW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1985 Mar; 77(3):1162-72. PubMed ID: 3980868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Temporal gap resolution in masked normal ears as a function of masker level.
    Fitzgibbons PJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1984 Jul; 76(1):67-70. PubMed ID: 6747113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Frequency and intensity difference limens for harmonics within complex tones.
    Moore BC; Glasberg BR; Shailer MJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1984 Feb; 75(2):550-61. PubMed ID: 6699293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Level discrimination of tones as a function of duration.
    Florentine M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1986 Mar; 79(3):792-8. PubMed ID: 3958321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.