These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4031251)

  • 1. Localization of sound in rooms, II: The effects of a single reflecting surface.
    Rakerd B; Hartmann WM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1985 Aug; 78(2):524-33. PubMed ID: 4031251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Localization of sound in rooms, III: Onset and duration effects.
    Rakerd B; Hartmann WM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1986 Dec; 80(6):1695-706. PubMed ID: 3794076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Independent or integrated processing of interaural time and level differences in human auditory cortex?
    Altmann CF; Terada S; Kashino M; Goto K; Mima T; Fukuyama H; Furukawa S
    Hear Res; 2014 Jun; 312():121-7. PubMed ID: 24709274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. High-frequency neurons in the inferior colliculus that are sensitive to interaural delays of amplitude-modulated tones: evidence for dual binaural influences.
    Batra R; Kuwada S; Stanford TR
    J Neurophysiol; 1993 Jul; 70(1):64-80. PubMed ID: 8395589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of interaural pitch matching and auditory image centering on binaural sensitivity in cochlear implant users.
    Kan A; Litovsky RY; Goupell MJ
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(3):e62-8. PubMed ID: 25565660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The precedence effect and its possible role in the avoidance of interaural ambiguities.
    Zurek PM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1980 Mar; 67(3):953-64. PubMed ID: 7358920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Horizontal sound localization in cochlear implant users with a contralateral hearing aid.
    Veugen LCE; Hendrikse MME; van Wanrooij MM; Agterberg MJH; Chalupper J; Mens LHM; Snik AFM; John van Opstal A
    Hear Res; 2016 Jun; 336():72-82. PubMed ID: 27178443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The impact of reference tones on the adjustment of interaural cues.
    Ignaz A; Lang AG; Buchner A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Apr; 135(4):1986-92. PubMed ID: 25234997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Temporal weighting of binaural information at low frequencies: Discrimination of dynamic interaural time and level differences.
    Diedesch AC; Stecker GC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Jul; 138(1):125-33. PubMed ID: 26233013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of interaural level and phase cues on intervening interference in auditory working memory for loudness.
    Jump RL; Ries DT
    Hear Res; 2008 Jun; 240(1-2):112-5. PubMed ID: 18514450
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Interaural time differences: implications regarding the neurophysiology of sound localization.
    Roth GL; Kochhar RK; Hind JE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1980 Dec; 68(6):1643-51. PubMed ID: 7462463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. On the influence of interaural differences on temporal perception of noise bursts of different durations.
    Schimmel O; Kohlrausch A
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2008 Feb; 123(2):986-97. PubMed ID: 18247901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. On the variation of interaural time differences with frequency.
    Benichoux V; Rébillat M; Brette R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Apr; 139(4):1810. PubMed ID: 27106329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Psychophysical and physiological evidence for a precedence effect in the median sagittal plane.
    Litovsky RY; Rakerd B; Yin TC; Hartmann WM
    J Neurophysiol; 1997 Apr; 77(4):2223-6. PubMed ID: 9114271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Blind people are more sensitive than sighted people to binaural sound-location cues, particularly inter-aural level differences.
    Nilsson ME; Schenkman BN
    Hear Res; 2016 Feb; 332():223-232. PubMed ID: 26433052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Interaural time difference thresholds as a function of frequency.
    Hartmann WM; Dunai L; Qu T
    Adv Exp Med Biol; 2013; 787():239-46. PubMed ID: 23716229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The spatio-temporal brain dynamics of processing and integrating sound localization cues in humans.
    Tardif E; Murray MM; Meylan R; Spierer L; Clarke S
    Brain Res; 2006 May; 1092(1):161-76. PubMed ID: 16684510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Localization of sound in rooms. IV: The Franssen effect.
    Hartmann WM; Rakerd B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Oct; 86(4):1366-73. PubMed ID: 2808910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Temporal weighting functions for interaural time and level differences. IV. Effects of carrier frequency.
    Stecker GC
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Dec; 136(6):3221. PubMed ID: 25480069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Trading of dynamic interaural time and level difference cues and its effect on the auditory motion-onset response measured with electroencephalography.
    Altmann CF; Ueda R; Bucher B; Furukawa S; Ono K; Kashino M; Mima T; Fukuyama H
    Neuroimage; 2017 Oct; 159():185-194. PubMed ID: 28756239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.