35 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4031276)
1. The power of three: Atrial rate limit power-on-reset - A non-electromagnetic cause of pacemaker-induced extracardiac stimulation.
Torbey E; Sharma E; Betzold R; Mehta C; Vogt B; Chu A
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 2024 Jan; 47(1):113-116. PubMed ID: 37310105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Pump up the volume: breathing facilitates cardiac output during exercise by mechanical action.
O'Halloran KD
J Physiol; 2023 Nov; 601(21):4651-4652. PubMed ID: 37823987
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Usefulness of hemodynamic sensors for physiologic cardiac pacing in heart failure patients.
Occhetta E; Bortnik M; Marino P
Cardiol Res Pract; 2011 Mar; 2011():925653. PubMed ID: 21461359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Sensors for rate responsive pacing.
Dell'Orto S; Valli P; Greco EM
Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J; 2004 Jul; 4(3):137-45. PubMed ID: 16943981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Indications and choices in pacemaker therapy.
Benrey J
Tex Heart Inst J; 1991; 18(3):170-8. PubMed ID: 15227476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. What can we learn from exercise testing beyond the detection of myocardial ischemia?
Weber KT
Clin Cardiol; 1997 Aug; 20(8):684-96. PubMed ID: 9259161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of the normal sinus node with seven types of rate responsive pacemaker during everyday activity.
Sulke AN; Pipilis A; Henderson RA; Bucknall CA; Sowton E
Br Heart J; 1990 Jul; 64(1):25-31. PubMed ID: 2390399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [30 years cardiac pacemaker therapy: a status evaluation].
Stangl K; Wirtzfeld A; Alt E; Blömer H
Z Kardiol; 1990 Jun; 79(6):383-95. PubMed ID: 2198730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Deleterious effects of long-term single-chamber ventricular pacing in patients with sick sinus syndrome: the hidden benefits of dual-chamber pacing.
Hesselson AB; Parsonnet V; Bernstein AD; Bonavita GJ
J Am Coll Cardiol; 1992 Jun; 19(7):1542-9. PubMed ID: 1593051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Respiration-dependent ventricular pacing compared with fixed ventricular and atrial-ventricular synchronous pacing: aerobic and hemodynamic variables.
Rossi P; Rognoni G; Occhetta E; Aina F; Prando MD; Plicchi G; Minella M
J Am Coll Cardiol; 1985 Sep; 6(3):646-52. PubMed ID: 4031276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Clinical and hemodynamic comparison of VVI versus DDD pacing in patients with DDD pacemakers.
Rediker DE; Eagle KA; Homma S; Gillam LD; Harthorne JW
Am J Cardiol; 1988 Feb; 61(4):323-9. PubMed ID: 3341209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of physical work capacity and systolic time intervals with ventricular inhibited and atrial synchronous ventricular inhibited pacing.
Kruse I; Rydén L
Br Heart J; 1981 Aug; 46(2):129-36. PubMed ID: 7272123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Measurements of cardiac output by impedance cardiography in pacemaker patients at rest: effects of various atrioventricular delays.
Ovsyshcher I; Zimlichman R; Katz A; Bondy C; Furman S
J Am Coll Cardiol; 1993 Mar; 21(3):761-7. PubMed ID: 8436759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Importance of heart rate response during exercise in patients using atrioventricular synchronous and ventricular pacemakers.
McMeekin JD; Lautner D; Hanson S; Gulamhusein SS
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1990 Jan; 13(1):59-68. PubMed ID: 1689036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Adequacy of pacing rate during exercise in rate responsive ventricular pacing.
Hasegawa A; Hatori M; Amano M; Iijima T; Adachi H; Yamaguchi E; Fukuda T; Murata K; Nagai R
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1997 Feb; 20(2 Pt 1):307-12. PubMed ID: 9058868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
