These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4033591)

  • 21. Evaluation of transmission data of diagnostic X rays through concrete using Monte Carlo simulation.
    Noto K; Koshida K; Iida H; Fukuda A
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2009 Feb; 133(3):144-52. PubMed ID: 19307234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Phantom equivalent thicknesses in diagnostic radiology.
    Carrier R; Blais N
    Phys Med Biol; 1987 Sep; 32(9):1151-7. PubMed ID: 3671499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Development and Monte Carlo analysis of antiscatter grids for mammography.
    Boone JM; Makarova OV; Zyryanov VN; Tang CM; Mancini DC; Moldovan N; Divan R
    Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2002 Dec; 1(6):441-7. PubMed ID: 12625771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Low-energy imaging with high-energy bremsstrahlung beams: analysis and scatter reduction.
    Mah DW; Galbraith DM; Rawlinson JA
    Med Phys; 1993; 20(3):653-65. PubMed ID: 8350817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. An analytical model of the scattered radiation distribution in diagnostic radiology.
    Boone JM; Seibert JA
    Med Phys; 1988; 15(5):721-5. PubMed ID: 3185408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Quantification of scattered radiation in projection mammography: four practical methods compared.
    Salvagnini E; Bosmans H; Struelens L; Marshall NW
    Med Phys; 2012 Jun; 39(6):3167-80. PubMed ID: 22755701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The effect of scattering foil parameters on electron-beam Monte Carlo calculations.
    Bieda MR; Antolak JA; Hogstrom KR
    Med Phys; 2001 Dec; 28(12):2527-34. PubMed ID: 11797957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Evaluation of image quality in fluoroscopy by measurements and Monte Carlo calculations.
    Tapiovaara MJ; Sandborg M
    Phys Med Biol; 1995 Apr; 40(4):589-607. PubMed ID: 7610116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Validation of a Monte Carlo code system for grid evaluation with interference effect on Rayleigh scattering.
    Zhou A; White GL; Davidson R
    Phys Med Biol; 2018 Feb; 63(3):03NT02. PubMed ID: 29283359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Generalised use of contrast degradation and contrast improvement factors in diagnostic radiology. Application to vanishing contrast.
    Carlsson GA; Carlsson CA; Nielsen B; Persliden J
    Phys Med Biol; 1986 Jul; 31(7):737-49. PubMed ID: 3749260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A patient-specific Monte Carlo dose-calculation method for photon beams.
    Wang L; Chui CS; Lovelock M
    Med Phys; 1998 Jun; 25(6):867-78. PubMed ID: 9650174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Build-up and surface dose measurements on phantoms using micro-MOSFET in 6 and 10 MV x-ray beams and comparisons with Monte Carlo calculations.
    Xiang HF; Song JS; Chin DW; Cormack RA; Tishler RB; Makrigiorgos GM; Court LE; Chin LM
    Med Phys; 2007 Apr; 34(4):1266-73. PubMed ID: 17500458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Monte Carlo validation in diagnostic radiological imaging.
    Boone JM; Buonocore MH; Cooper VN
    Med Phys; 2000 Jun; 27(6):1294-304. PubMed ID: 10902559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Optimized radial and angular positions in Monte Carlo modeling.
    Wang L; Jacques SL
    Med Phys; 1994 Jul; 21(7):1081-3. PubMed ID: 7968840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Improved image quality of cone beam CT scans for radiotherapy image guidance using fiber-interspaced antiscatter grid.
    Stankovic U; van Herk M; Ploeger LS; Sonke JJ
    Med Phys; 2014 Jun; 41(6):061910. PubMed ID: 24877821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. X-ray scatter data for diagnostic radiology.
    Dick CE; Soares CG; Motz JW
    Phys Med Biol; 1978 Nov; 23(6):1076-85. PubMed ID: 733896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Physical and clinical evaluation of new high-strip-density radiographic grids.
    Doi K; Frank PH; Chan HP; Vyborny CJ; Makino S; Iida N; Carlin M
    Radiology; 1983 May; 147(2):575-82. PubMed ID: 6340160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Schemes for the optimization of chest radiography using a computer model of the patient and x-ray imaging system.
    Sandborg M; McVey G; Dance DR; Alm Carlsson G
    Med Phys; 2001 Oct; 28(10):2007-19. PubMed ID: 11695764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Physical evaluation of prototype high-performance anti-scatter grids: potential for improved digital radiographic image quality.
    Fetterly KA; Schueler BA
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 Jan; 54(2):N37-42. PubMed ID: 19098352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Assessment of different computational models for generation of x-ray spectra in diagnostic radiology and mammography.
    Ay MR; Sarkar S; Shahriari M; Sardari D; Zaidi H
    Med Phys; 2005 Jun; 32(6):1660-75. PubMed ID: 16013725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.