These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4034352)

  • 1. Acquisition and decision during target search of visual letter displays.
    Donderi DC
    Percept Psychophys; 1985 Apr; 37(4):345-54. PubMed ID: 4034352
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Acquisition and decision in visual same-different search of letter displays.
    Donderi DC
    Percept Psychophys; 1983 Mar; 33(3):271-82. PubMed ID: 6866688
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Comparison time of pictures: how does reaction time change when the number of necessary steps for decision stays the same].
    Czigler I; Tölgyesi M
    Z Psychol Z Angew Psychol; 1984; (Suppl 6):47-64. PubMed ID: 6152861
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of sequence and variety of irrelevant items on visual search.
    Marken R; Pettersen J
    Percept Mot Skills; 1979 Aug; 49(1):315-8. PubMed ID: 503753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Target-distractor discriminability in visual search.
    Pashler H
    Percept Psychophys; 1987 Apr; 41(4):385-92. PubMed ID: 3588236
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Search time as a function of context letter frequency.
    Latimer CR
    Perception; 1972; 1(1):57-71. PubMed ID: 4680926
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evidence for direct visual access to letter identities.
    Haber RN; Cole RA
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 1980 Dec; 46(3):181-92. PubMed ID: 7211436
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Visual letter-matching and the time course of visual and acoustic codes.
    Carrasco M; Kinchla RA; Figueroa JG
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 1988 Oct; 69(1):1-17. PubMed ID: 3245474
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An activation--verification model for letter and word recognition: the word-superiority effect.
    Paap KR; Newsome SL; McDonald JE; Schvaneveldt RW
    Psychol Rev; 1982 Sep; 89(5):573-94. PubMed ID: 7178333
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. More about the letter-frequency effect.
    Mason M
    Percept Psychophys; 1982 Jun; 31(6):589-90. PubMed ID: 7122197
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Null effects of exposure duration and heterogeneity of difference on the same-different disparity in letter matching.
    Proctor RW; Rao KV
    Percept Psychophys; 1983 Feb; 33(2):163-71. PubMed ID: 6844107
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Processing redundant signals: coactivation, divided attention, or what?
    Eriksen CW; Goettl B; St James JD; Fournier LR
    Percept Psychophys; 1989 Apr; 45(4):356-70. PubMed ID: 2710636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Visual and acoustic processing in making same-different judgments.
    Yaworsky KB
    Percept Mot Skills; 1983 Apr; 56(2):499-504. PubMed ID: 6866659
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. More rapid visual identification rate in search of a missing stimulus.
    Inamori Y; Inamori R
    Percept Mot Skills; 1990 Apr; 70(2):570. PubMed ID: 2342858
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Age differences and similarities in the improvement of controlled search.
    Madden DJ
    Exp Aging Res; 1982; 8(2):91-8. PubMed ID: 7128659
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Flexibility in the choice of distinctive features in visual search with blocked and random designs.
    Corcoran DW; Jackson A
    Perception; 1979; 8(6):629-33. PubMed ID: 530804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Identifying rotated letter-like symbols.
    Eley MG
    Mem Cognit; 1982 Jan; 10(1):25-32. PubMed ID: 7087765
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Why search for target absence is so slow (and careful!): the more targets there are, the more likely you are to miss one.
    Krueger LE; Shapiro RG
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1980 Nov; 6(4):662-85. PubMed ID: 6449536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Letter and word code interactions elicited by normally displayed words.
    Lawry JA; LaBerge D
    Percept Psychophys; 1981 Jul; 30(1):71-82. PubMed ID: 7290898
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Perceived symmetry and visual matching.
    Hershenson M; Ryder J
    Am J Psychol; 1982; 95(4):669-80. PubMed ID: 7168458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.