These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4034662)
1. Social censorship of medical and ethical decisions. Thomasma DC; Micetich K; Steinecker PH Pharos Alpha Omega Alpha Honor Med Soc; 1985; 48(3):22-6. PubMed ID: 4034662 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. A moment in human development: legal protection, ethical standards and social policy on the selective non-treatment of handicapped neonates. Gostin L Am J Law Med; 1985; 11(1):31-78. PubMed ID: 3832944 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A neonatologist looks at the baby Doe Rule: ethical decisions by edict. Berseth CL Pediatrics; 1983 Sep; 72(3):428-9. PubMed ID: 6889050 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. If not that way, what way? America (NY); 1986 Jul; 155(2):21. PubMed ID: 11658787 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Who should make medical decisions? Genel M Conn Med; 1984 Aug; 48(8):547-8. PubMed ID: 11644157 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Amendments to Child Abuse Prevention and Treatment Act. Public Law 98-457. United States US Statut Large; 1984; 98(Title I Sections 101a-312a):. PubMed ID: 11686171 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Panel specifies who should decide to 'pull the plug. Med World News; 1982 Nov; 23(24):6-9. PubMed ID: 11645475 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Medical ethics in life and death. Thompson R Editor Res Rep; 1984 Feb; 1(8):147-68. PubMed ID: 11652477 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Confusion over the language of the Baby Doe regulations. Bermel J Hastings Cent Rep; 1986 Dec; 16(6):2. PubMed ID: 11643944 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. The ideal of community in the work of the President's Commission. Burt RA Cardozo Law Rev; 1984; 6(2):267-86. PubMed ID: 11651800 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Infant care review committees: an effective approach to the Baby Doe dilemma? Shapiro RS; Barthel R Hastings Law J; 1986 May; 37(5):827-62. PubMed ID: 11655857 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Reporting the case of Baby Jane Doe. Kerr K Hastings Cent Rep; 1984 Aug; 14(4):7-9. PubMed ID: 6237076 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Ethical dilemmas in the treatment of critically ill newborns. Brooks BF J Contemp Health Law Policy; 1985; 1(1):133-41. PubMed ID: 10280374 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Advance directives: the United States experience. Cranford RE Humane Med; 1993 Jan; 9(1):64-9. PubMed ID: 11652943 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Balancing wishes with wisdom: sustaining infant life. Wakefield-Fisher M Nurs Health Care; 1987 Nov; 8(9):517-20. PubMed ID: 11644099 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Withdrawal of life-support in the newborn: whose baby is it? Clark FI Southwest Univ Law Rev; 1993; 23(1):1-46. PubMed ID: 11659817 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Two precipices, one chasm: the economics of physician-assisted suicide and euthanasia. Lund N Hastings Constit Law Q; 1997; 24(4):903-46. PubMed ID: 11657287 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The care of defective neonates, ethics committees and federal intervention. Riga PJ Linacre Q; 1984 Aug; 51(3):255-76. PubMed ID: 11649572 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Baby Jane Doe ruling upheld; suit fails. Curran M Ob Gyn News; 1983 Dec 15-31; 18(24):8. PubMed ID: 11653509 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]