These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

67 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4034968)

  • 1. CT measurement of the diameter of spinal and other bony canals: effects of section angle and thickness.
    Eubanks BA; Cann CE; Brant-Zawadzki M
    Radiology; 1985 Oct; 157(1):243-6. PubMed ID: 4034968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [The problem of measuring the size of the spinal canal with CT].
    Klumair J; Fochem K
    Radiologe; 1980 Apr; 20(4):203-4. PubMed ID: 7413976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [An experimental study on the computed tomography of the cervical spinal canal (author's transl)].
    Wakabayashi T
    Nihon Seikeigeka Gakkai Zasshi; 1980 Mar; 54(3):267-84. PubMed ID: 7381279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Does the angle of the computed tomographic scan change spinal canal measurements?
    Bayley JC; Kruger DM; Schlegel JM
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1991 Oct; 16(10 Suppl):S526-9. PubMed ID: 1801265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Computed tomography of the spinal canal.
    Hammerschiag SB; Wolpert SM; Carter BL
    Radiology; 1976 Nov; 121(2):361-7. PubMed ID: 981614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Factors affecting the measurement of size and CT number in computed tomography.
    Baxter BS; Sorenson JA
    Invest Radiol; 1981; 16(4):337-41. PubMed ID: 7275548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Quantitative assessment of the lumbar spinal canal by computed tomography.
    Ullrich CG; Binet EF; Sanecki MG; Kieffer SA
    Radiology; 1980 Jan; 134(1):137-43. PubMed ID: 7350593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Postoperative bony stenosis of the lumbar spinal canal: evaluation of 164 symptomatic patients with axial radiography.
    Quencer RM; Murtagh FR; Post MJ; Rosomoff HL; Stokes NA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1978 Dec; 131(6):1059-64. PubMed ID: 104574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of computerized tomography parameters of the cervical spine in normal control subjects and spinal cord-injured patients.
    Matsuura P; Waters RL; Adkins RH; Rothman S; Gurbani N; Sie I
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1989 Feb; 71(2):183-8. PubMed ID: 2918002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparison of radiographic methods of diagnosing constrictive lesions of the spinal canal. Toshiba unit vs. CT scanner.
    Post MJ; Gargano FP; Vining DQ; Rosomoff HL
    J Neurosurg; 1978 Mar; 48(3):360-8. PubMed ID: 632861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Lumbar spinal canal morphometry from computed tomography scans: reproducibility, results and clinical implications.
    Greenough CG; Fraser RD
    Eur Spine J; 1992 Jun; 1(1):32-7. PubMed ID: 20054945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Sagittal widths of the cervical spinal canal in the computerized tomogram].
    Kock C
    Radiologe; 1986 May; 26(5):239-41. PubMed ID: 3726100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of computerized tomography parameters of the thoracolumbar spine in normal control subjects and spinal cord injured patients.
    Rao S; Waters RL; Badani K; Sie I; Adkins RH
    Contemp Orthop; 1994 Nov; 29(5):329-33. PubMed ID: 10150252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Morphological changes of the cervical spinal canal and cord due to aging].
    Tanaka Y
    Nihon Seikeigeka Gakkai Zasshi; 1984 Sep; 58(9):873-86. PubMed ID: 6520497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Computed tomography of the lower lumbar vertebral column. Normal anatomy and the stenotic canal.
    Sheldon JJ; Sersland T; Leborgne J
    Radiology; 1977 Jul; 124(1):113-8. PubMed ID: 866626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [CT analysis of developmental spinal canal stenosis].
    Shidahara Y
    Nihon Seikeigeka Gakkai Zasshi; 1990 May; 64(5):392-400. PubMed ID: 2380593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Dynamic changes in the dimensions of the lumbar spinal canal: an experimental study in vitro.
    Schönström N; Lindahl S; Willén J; Hansson T
    J Orthop Res; 1989; 7(1):115-21. PubMed ID: 2908901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Computer tomography of the spinal canal using metrizamide.
    Isherwood I; Fawcitt RA; St Clair Forbes W; Nettle JR; Pullan BR
    Acta Radiol Suppl; 1977; 355():299-305. PubMed ID: 299675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Measurements of the lumbar spinal canal of Chinese by computed tomography].
    Huang TJ; Chen WJ; Chen JY; Fang CM; Chu LY
    Changgeng Yi Xue Za Zhi; 1994 Mar; 17(1):44-9. PubMed ID: 8205497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Tomodensitometric measurements of the bony lumbar spinal canal. I. Radio-anatomic correlation].
    Morvan G; Massare C
    J Belge Radiol; 1982; 65(5):397-402. PubMed ID: 7182401
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.