These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4037029)

  • 21. A comparison of the OKP visual field screening test with the Humphrey field analyser.
    Vernon SA; Quigley HA
    Eye (Lond); 1992; 6 ( Pt 5)():521-4. PubMed ID: 1286719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Increased detection rate of glaucomatous visual field damage with locally condensed grids: a comparison between fundus-oriented perimetry and conventional visual field examination.
    Schiefer U; Flad M; Stumpp F; Malsam A; Paetzold J; Vonthein R; Denk PO; Sample PA
    Arch Ophthalmol; 2003 Apr; 121(4):458-65. PubMed ID: 12695242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Application of oculokinetic perimetry in examination of the eye].
    Wakakura M; Kageyama M; Hamanaka T; Shimizu K; Joshita H; Shimizu T; Baba H; Kisara M; Miyata M
    Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi; 1996 Jul; 100(7):551-7. PubMed ID: 8741340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. SITA-Standard perimetry has better performance than FDT2 matrix perimetry for detecting glaucomatous progression.
    Wall M; Johnson CA; Zamba KD
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2018 Oct; 102(10):1396-1401. PubMed ID: 29331951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The detection of glaucomatous visual field defects by oculo-kinetic perimetry: which points are best for screening?
    Damato BE; Ahmed J; Allan D; McClure E; Jay JL
    Eye (Lond); 1989; 3 ( Pt 6)():727-31. PubMed ID: 2630353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [Short-wavelength automated perimetry (SWAP) in subjects with suspected glaucoma (I): assessment of sensitivity thresholds].
    Polo Llorens V; Pinilla Lozano I; Pablo Júlvez LE; Larrosa Poves JM; Abecia Martínez E; Cuevas Andrés R; Rojo Aragües A; Honrubia López FM
    Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol; 2000 Feb; 75(2):91-6. PubMed ID: 11151126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Automatic perimetry (COMPETER). Ability to detect early glaucomatous field defects.
    Heijl A; Drance SM; Douglas GR
    Arch Ophthalmol; 1980 Sep; 98(9):1560-3. PubMed ID: 7425915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Use of high spatial resolution perimetry to identify scotomata not apparent with conventional perimetry in the nasal field of glaucomatous subjects.
    Westcott MC; Garway-Heath DF; Fitzke FW; Kamal D; Hitchings RA
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2002 Jul; 86(7):761-6. PubMed ID: 12084745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Clinical classification of glaucomatous visual field loss by frequency doubling perimetry.
    Sponsel WE; Arango S; Trigo Y; Mensah J
    Am J Ophthalmol; 1998 Jun; 125(6):830-6. PubMed ID: 9645720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Glaucoma diagnostics.
    Geimer SA
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2013 Feb; 91 Thesis 1():1-32. PubMed ID: 23384049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Humphrey matrix frequency doubling perimetry for detection of visual-field defects in open-angle glaucoma.
    Clement CI; Goldberg I; Healey PR; Graham S
    Br J Ophthalmol; 2009 May; 93(5):582-8. PubMed ID: 18669543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Evaluation of oculokinetic perimetry.
    Chia WL; Goldberg I; Bauman A
    Aust N Z J Ophthalmol; 1999 Oct; 27(5):306-11. PubMed ID: 10571390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Recognizing glaucomatous field loss with the Humphrey STATPAC.
    Enger C; Sommer A
    Arch Ophthalmol; 1987 Oct; 105(10):1355-7. PubMed ID: 3662906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Identifying glaucomatous vision loss with visual-function-specific perimetry in the diagnostic innovations in glaucoma study.
    Sample PA; Medeiros FA; Racette L; Pascual JP; Boden C; Zangwill LM; Bowd C; Weinreb RN
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2006 Aug; 47(8):3381-9. PubMed ID: 16877406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Evaluating the visual field effects of blepharoptosis using automated static perimetry.
    Meyer DR; Stern JH; Jarvis JM; Lininger LL
    Ophthalmology; 1993 May; 100(5):651-8; discussion 658-9. PubMed ID: 8493006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Spatial analyses of glaucomatous visual fields; a comparison with traditional visual field indices.
    Asman P; Heijl A; Olsson J; Rootzén H
    Acta Ophthalmol (Copenh); 1992 Oct; 70(5):679-86. PubMed ID: 1471495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Identification of functional visual field loss by automated static perimetry.
    Frisén L
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2014 Dec; 92(8):805-9. PubMed ID: 24698019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Comparison of automated and manual perimetry in patients with blepharoptosis.
    Alniemi ST; Pang NK; Woog JJ; Bradley EA
    Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg; 2013; 29(5):361-3. PubMed ID: 23924985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A visual field screening protocol for glaucoma.
    Rabin S; Kolesar P; Podos SM; Wilensky JT
    Am J Ophthalmol; 1981 Oct; 92(4):630-5. PubMed ID: 7027800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Improving the sensitivity of the OKP visual field screening test with the use of neutral density filters.
    Vernon SA; Quigley HA
    Eye (Lond); 1994; 8 ( Pt 4)():406-9. PubMed ID: 7821461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.