These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 403791)

  • 1. The application of fast screen-film systems to excretory urography.
    Stables DP; Rossi RP; Caruthers SB; Anderson N
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1977 Apr; 128(4):617-9. PubMed ID: 403791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of crossover exposure on radiographic image quality of screen-film systems.
    Doi K; Loo LN; Anderson TM; Frank PH
    Radiology; 1981 Jun; 139(3):707-14. PubMed ID: 7232738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of screen/film combinations on diagnostic certainty: Hi-Plus/RPL versus Lanex/Ortho G in excretory urography.
    Thornbury JR; Fryback DG; Patterson FE; Chiavarini RL
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1978 Jan; 130(1):83-7. PubMed ID: 413423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Clinical comparison of high-speed rare-earth screen and par-speed screen for diagnostic efficacy and radiation dosage.
    Robinson T; Becker JA; Olson AP
    Radiology; 1982 Oct; 145(1):214-6. PubMed ID: 6821592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The evaluation of high-speed screen-film combinations in angiography.
    Ovitt TW; Moore R; Armplatz K
    Radiology; 1975 Feb; 114(2):449-52. PubMed ID: 1111014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An evaluation of rare earth screen/film combinations.
    Rossi RP; Hendee WR; Ahrens CR
    Radiology; 1976 Nov; 121(2):465-71. PubMed ID: 981629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparative evaluation of rare-earth screen-film systems. System speed, contrast, sensitometry, RMS noise, square-wave response function, and contrast-dose-detail analysis.
    Fearon T; Vucich J; Hoe J; McSweeney WJ; Potter BM
    Invest Radiol; 1986 Aug; 21(8):654-62. PubMed ID: 3744739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Prospects for x-ray exposure reduction using rare earth intensifying screens.
    Wagner RF; Weaver KE
    Radiology; 1976 Jan; 118(1):183-8. PubMed ID: 1244656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [A new rare earth intensifying screen: lanthanum oxybromide (Quanta III - Dupont): relative speed, resolution and image quality (author's transl)].
    Bergamini C; Laudicina L; Marengo M; Pavlica P; Viglietta G; Zanini M
    Radiol Med; 1980 Oct; 66(10):699-704. PubMed ID: 7221029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The LSF and MTF of rare-earth oxysulfide intensifying screens.
    Arnold BA; Eisenberg H; Bjärngard BE
    Radiology; 1976 Nov; 121(2):473-7. PubMed ID: 981630
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Examinations of rare-earth film-screen-systems for image detectors in mammography (author's transl)].
    Weberling R
    Rontgenblatter; 1979 Mar; 32(3):109-16. PubMed ID: 432483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Plain radiography with a rare-earth screen: comparison with calcium tungstate screen.
    Picus D; McAlister WH; Smith E; Rodewald S; Jost RG; Evens RG
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1984 Dec; 143(6):1335-8. PubMed ID: 6333800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Rare-earth and calcium tungstate intensifying screens, a comparative study of relative speed, radiation doses and resolving power.
    de Carvalho A; Jørgensen J
    Rofo; 1978 Mar; 128(3):358-63. PubMed ID: 147838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Physical characteristics of modern radiographic screen-film systems.
    Rao GU; Fatouros PP; James AE
    Invest Radiol; 1978; 13(5):460-9. PubMed ID: 753799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Relative efficiencies of energy to photographic density conversions in typical screen-film systems.
    Vyborny CJ; Metz CE; Doi K
    Radiology; 1980 Aug; 136(2):465-71. PubMed ID: 7403525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An evaluation of screen-film speed characteristics.
    Reynolds J; Skucas J; Gorski J
    Radiology; 1976 Mar; 118(3):711-3. PubMed ID: 1251025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Screen/film system speed: its dependence on x-ray energy.
    Vyborny CJ; Metz CE; Doi K; Rossmann K
    Radiology; 1977 Dec; 125(3):811-6. PubMed ID: 928715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Abdominal x-ray diagnosis using digital luminescent radiography--a comparison with conventional film-screen systems].
    Krug B; Steinbrich W; Dietlein M; Lorenz R; Altenburg A; Küpper T
    Rontgenblatter; 1990 May; 43(5):181-7. PubMed ID: 2345848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Physical characteristics of four roentgenographic chains proposed for chest radiography.
    Manninen H; Pitkänen M; Wiljasalo M
    Br J Radiol; 1982 Dec; 55(660):891-6. PubMed ID: 7171933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [An economic comparison between digital luminescence radiography and conventional film processing in intensive care medicine].
    Peters PE; Dykstra DE; Wiesmann W; Schlüchtermann J; Adam D
    Radiologe; 1992 Nov; 32(11):536-40. PubMed ID: 1461981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.