These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 403791)
41. An evaluation of rare-earth imaging systems in panoramic radiography. Gratt BM; White SC; Packard FL; Petersson AR Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1984 Oct; 58(4):475-82. PubMed ID: 6593679 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Comparison of the image quality of 105mm film with conventional film. Skucas J; Gorski JW Radiology; 1976 Feb; 118(2):433-7. PubMed ID: 1250980 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. The dependence of radiographic mottle on beam quality. Barnes GT AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1976 Nov; 127(5):819-24. PubMed ID: 973671 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. An asymmetric screen pair for angiography. Moore WE; Cromwell LD Radiology; 1980 Sep; 136(3):787-8. PubMed ID: 7403563 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. A physical evaluation of the imaging performance of a high-resolution fluorography system. Cowen AR Br J Radiol; 1989 Nov; 62(743):999-1004. PubMed ID: 2819379 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. [High-contrast resolution of film-screen systems in oral and maxillofacial radiology]. Kaeppler G; Reinert S Rofo; 2007 Nov; 179(11):1145-51. PubMed ID: 17805997 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Digital urography using stimulable phosphor. An experimental study in the rabbit. Pettersson H; Aspelin P; Boijsen E Acta Radiol; 1988; 29(3):273-5. PubMed ID: 2968094 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Screen-film combinations used for cephalometric radiography. Hurlburt C Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1978 Nov; 46(5):721-4. PubMed ID: 280863 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. [The importance of high-speed screen-filmcombinations for coronary angiography (author's transl)]. Bardach G Rontgenblatter; 1977 Jun; 30(6):320-4. PubMed ID: 897517 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. A new high-definition microfocal X-ray unit. Buckland-Wright JC Br J Radiol; 1989 Mar; 62(735):201-8. PubMed ID: 2702377 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Use of a gradient intensifying screen for scoliosis radiography. Ritter EM; Wright CE; Fritz SL; Kirchmer NA; De Smet AA Radiology; 1980 Apr; 135(1):230-2. PubMed ID: 7360970 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Evaluation of mammography unit and rare earth screens for high resolution hand radiography. Desautels JE; Radomsky JW; Erickson LM J Can Assoc Radiol; 1980 Sep; 31(3):185-6. PubMed ID: 7419547 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Image quality, diagnostic certainty, and accuracy: comparison of conventional and digital urograms. Fajardo LL; Hillman BJ Urol Radiol; 1988; 10(2):72-4. PubMed ID: 3188300 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Exposure reduction through faster speed film-screen systems and a review of A.L.A.R.A. (as low as reasonably achievable). Nickoli PC Can J Med Radiat Technol; 1993 Aug; 24(3):98-107. PubMed ID: 10127889 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Clinical comparison between monochrome colour film and black-and-white film. Dahlin H; Welander U; Wilbrand H Acta Radiol Suppl; 1978; 356():1-58. PubMed ID: 233588 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
59. X-ray sensitometer for screen-film combinations used in medical radiology. Haus AG; Rossmann K Radiology; 1970 Mar; 94(3):673-8. PubMed ID: 5413910 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
60. [Application of T grain technique to the diagnosis of lung disease and analysis of its image quality]. Liu XJ; Liu PC; Cai P; Zhang D; Yao SS Zhonghua Lao Dong Wei Sheng Zhi Ye Bing Za Zhi; 2003 Jun; 21(3):206-8. PubMed ID: 14761490 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]