152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4037910)
1. Mitral replacement: clinical experience with a ball-valve prosthesis. Twenty-five years later.
Cobanoglu A; Grunkemeier GL; Aru GM; McKinley CL; Starr A
Ann Surg; 1985 Sep; 202(3):376-83. PubMed ID: 4037910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Thrombotic and embolic complications with silastic ball prosthetic valves.
Macmanus Q; Metzdorff MT; Grunkemeier GL; Starr A
Eur Heart J; 1984 Oct; 5 Suppl D():59-63. PubMed ID: 6519104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Thrombosis of mechanical cardiac valves: a qualitative comparison of the silastic ball valve and the tilting disc valve.
Metzdorff MT; Grunkemeier GL; Pinson CW; Starr A
J Am Coll Cardiol; 1984 Jul; 4(1):50-3. PubMed ID: 6736454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The unnatural history of valvular heart disease: late results with silastic ball valve prostheses.
Freimanis I; Starr A
J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino); 1984; 25(3):191-8. PubMed ID: 6376520
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Twelve-year comparison of a Bjork-Shiley mechanical heart valve with porcine bioprostheses.
Bloomfield P; Wheatley DJ; Prescott RJ; Miller HC
N Engl J Med; 1991 Feb; 324(9):573-9. PubMed ID: 1992318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. An eight-year experience with porcine bioprosthetic cardiac valves.
Hartz RS; Fisher EB; Finkelmeier B; DeBoer A; Sanders JH; Moran JM; Michaelis LL
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1986 Jun; 91(6):910-7. PubMed ID: 3713240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Comparative analysis of long-term results with porcine-aortic, bovine pericardial and tilting disc valves].
Kawazoe K; Kawaguchi O; Kosakai Y; Ohara K; Kito Y; Fujita T
Nihon Geka Gakkai Zasshi; 1989 Sep; 90(9):1534-7. PubMed ID: 2586460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Year of operation as a risk factor in the late results of valve replacement.
Macmanus Q; Grunkemeier GL; Lambert LE; Teply JF; Harlan BJ; Starr A
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1980 Dec; 80(6):834-41. PubMed ID: 7431982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparative clinical results with Omniscience (STM1), Medtronic-Hall, and Björk-Shiley convexo-concave (70 degrees) prostheses in mitral valve replacement.
Cortina JM; Martinell J; Artiz V; Fraile J; Rábago G
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1986 Feb; 91(2):174-83. PubMed ID: 3945084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Ball fracture with the 6120-model Starr-Edwards mitral valve prosthesis occurring late after implantation.
Mazzucco A; Luciani GB; Pessotto R; Piccin C; Faggian G; Chiominto B
J Heart Valve Dis; 1993 Mar; 2(2):245-7. PubMed ID: 8261163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Björk-Shiley and Carpentier-Edwards valves. A comparative analysis.
Nashef SA; Sethia B; Turner MA; Davidson KG; Lewis S; Bain WH
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1987 Mar; 93(3):394-404. PubMed ID: 3821149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The Starr-Edwards valve.
Starr A
J Am Coll Cardiol; 1985 Oct; 6(4):899-903. PubMed ID: 4031305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Fourteen years' experience with the Björk-Shiley tilting disc prosthesis.
Sethia B; Turner MA; Lewis S; Rodger RA; Bain WH
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1986 Mar; 91(3):350-61. PubMed ID: 3951241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of porcine valve xenografts with mechanical prostheses. A 7 1/2 year experience.
Joyce LD; Nelson RM
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1984 Jul; 88(1):102-13. PubMed ID: 6738092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Late results of valve replacement with the Björk-Shiley valve (1973 to 1982).
Orszulak TA; Schaff HV; DeSmet JM; Danielson GK; Pluth JR; Puga FJ
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1993 Feb; 105(2):302-12. PubMed ID: 8429659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical evaluation of a new anticoagulant therapy in prosthetic valve replacement.
Sakashita I; Ohtani S; Nakamura C; Washio M
Jpn Heart J; 1978 May; 19(3):324-31. PubMed ID: 29142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Mechanical valves: a comparative analysis of the Starr-Edwards and Björk-Shiley prostheses.
Murphy DA; Levine FH; Buckley MJ; Swinski L; Daggett WM; Akins CW; Austen WG
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1983 Nov; 86(5):746-52. PubMed ID: 6632948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Aortic and mitral monovalvular replacements. Comparison of the ball prosthesis of Starr-Edwards (1260-6120) and the tilting disc prosthesis of Bjork-Shiley. Series of 390 patients].
Monassier JP; Kurtz T; Heitz A; Lachmann P; Kretz JG; Jeanblanc B; Eisenmann B; Kieny R; Kieny MT
Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss; 1980 Jan; 73(1):79-84. PubMed ID: 6770788
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Mitral valve replacement with the Björk-Shiley monostrut prosthesis: a 4-year clinical experience].
Alajmo F; Perna AM; Calamai G; Nigro R; Cassai M; Montesi G; Braconi L; Borgioli A; Preziuso M; Palminiello A
G Ital Cardiol; 1990 Jan; 20(1):44-9. PubMed ID: 2328857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Twenty-two-year experience with aortic valve replacement. Starr-Edwards ball valves versus disc valves.
Pilegaard HK; Lund O; Nielsen TT; Magnussen K; Knudsen MA; Albrechtsen OK
Tex Heart Inst J; 1991; 18(1):24-33. PubMed ID: 15227505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
