These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4038025)

  • 21. Effects of high-pass filtering on MUAP metrics.
    Brownell AA; Bromberg MB
    Muscle Nerve; 2009 Dec; 40(6):1008-11. PubMed ID: 19670322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Where is the ideal reference site for recording the thenar compound muscle action potential.
    Wee AS; Ashley RA
    Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1988; 28(5):249-52. PubMed ID: 3191874
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Normal and abnormal voluntary activity.
    Rubin DI
    Handb Clin Neurol; 2019; 160():281-301. PubMed ID: 31277854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Estimation of motor unit conduction velocity from surface EMG recordings by signal-based selection of the spatial filters.
    Mesin L; Tizzani F; Farina D
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2006 Oct; 53(10):1963-71. PubMed ID: 17019860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Comparison of conventional and decomposition-enhanced spike triggered averaging techniques.
    Lawson VH; Bromberg MB; Stashuk D
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2004 Mar; 115(3):564-8. PubMed ID: 15036051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. "Facial" and standard concentric needle electrodes are not interchangeable.
    Barkhaus PE; Roberts MM; Nandedkar SD
    Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol; 2006 Sep; 46(5):259-61. PubMed ID: 17059096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Volume conduction of motor unit potentials from different human muscles to long distances.
    Gydikov A; Gerilovsky L; Gatev P; Kostov K
    Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1982; 22(1-2):105-16. PubMed ID: 6279384
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A two-channel method for sampling, averaging and quantifying motor unit potentials.
    Lang AH; Falck B
    J Neurol; 1980; 223(3):199-206. PubMed ID: 6157013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. New attempts to quantify concentric needle electromyography.
    Sonoo M
    Muscle Nerve Suppl; 2002; 11():S98-S102. PubMed ID: 12116293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Range of variations in motor unit potentials during reinnervation after traumatic nerve lesions in humans.
    Borenstein S; Desmedt JE
    Ann Neurol; 1980 Nov; 8(5):460-7. PubMed ID: 7436392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Increased neuromuscular transmission instability and motor unit remodelling with diabetic neuropathy as assessed using novel near fibre motor unit potential parameters.
    Allen MD; Stashuk DW; Kimpinski K; Doherty TJ; Hourigan ML; Rice CL
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2015 Apr; 126(4):794-802. PubMed ID: 25240249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Inter-rater reliability of motor unit number estimates and quantitative motor unit analysis in the tibialis anterior muscle.
    Boe SG; Dalton BH; Harwood B; Doherty TJ; Rice CL
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2009 May; 120(5):947-52. PubMed ID: 19375385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Decomposition-based quantitative electromyography: effect of force on motor unit potentials and motor unit number estimates.
    Boe SG; Stashuk DW; Brown WF; Doherty TJ
    Muscle Nerve; 2005 Mar; 31(3):365-73. PubMed ID: 15627267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Atypical motor unit potentials in Emery-Dreifuss muscular dystrophy (EDMD).
    Rowińska-Marcińska K; Szmidt-Sałkowska E; Fidziańska A; Zalewska E; Dorobek M; Karwańska A; Hausmanowa-Petrusewicz I
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2005 Nov; 116(11):2520-7. PubMed ID: 16214403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Surface detected potentials of normal and reinnervated motor units: a simulation study for muscles consisted of short fibres.
    Dimitrova NA; Disselhorst-Klug C; Trachterna A; Dimitrov GV; Rau G
    Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol; 2002 Jun; 42(4):219-30. PubMed ID: 12056337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A new method for the extraction and classification of single motor unit action potentials from surface EMG signals.
    Gazzoni M; Farina D; Merletti R
    J Neurosci Methods; 2004 Jul; 136(2):165-77. PubMed ID: 15183268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. EMG needle electrodes: electrical impedance.
    Wiechers DO; Blood JR; Stow RW
    Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1979 Aug; 60(8):364-9. PubMed ID: 464781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Effect of filter setting on the electromyographic parameters of muscles contracting to fatigue.
    Shochina M; Vatine JJ; Mahler Y; Gonen B; Magora A
    Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1989; 29(1):3-8. PubMed ID: 2702958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Motor unit analysis. Comparison between concentric and monopolar electrodes.
    Pease WS; Bowyer BL
    Am J Phys Med Rehabil; 1988 Feb; 67(1):2-6. PubMed ID: 3345237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Usefulness of an increase in size of motor unit potential sample.
    Podnar S
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2004 Jul; 115(7):1683-8. PubMed ID: 15203070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.