These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4038531)
1. Withdrawal and withholding of life-support in terminally ill patients. Part II. Solnick PB Med Law; 1985; 4(1):1-11. PubMed ID: 4038531 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Treatment of incompetent terminally ill patients. 1. The American experience. Thomson CJ Med J Aust; 1982 Feb; 1(4):188-90. PubMed ID: 7078492 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Silent decisions: limits of consent and the terminally ill patient. Brennan TA Law Med Health Care; 1988; 16(3-4):204-9. PubMed ID: 3205051 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Termination of medical treatment: a judicial perspective. Ackerman JW; Pope MC J Leg Med; 1982 Jun; 3(2):211-43. PubMed ID: 6981677 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Rights of the terminally ill patient. Hodgson J Ann Health Law; 1996; (5):169-91. PubMed ID: 10164517 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Withholding of life-sustaining treatment from the terminally ill, incompetent patient: who decides? Part II. Suber DG; Tabor WJ JAMA; 1982 Nov; 248(19):2431-2. PubMed ID: 7131695 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Substitute consent. Reconciling negative treatment and consent to routine medical treatment. Sappington GM J Leg Med; 1986 Sep; 7(3):341-55. PubMed ID: 3490528 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Decision making in the care of terminally ill incompetent persons: concerns about the role of the courts. Mariner WK J Am Geriatr Soc; 1984 Oct; 32(10):739-46. PubMed ID: 6481053 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Withholding of life-sustaining treatment from the terminal ill, incompetent patient: who decides? Part I. Suber DG; Tabor WJ JAMA; 1982 Nov; 248(18):2250-1. PubMed ID: 7131676 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Medical ethics after Quinlan: guidelines and the ethics of dying. Hudson RP J Kans Med Soc; 1982 Jul; 83(7):371-5, 340. PubMed ID: 7119537 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Withdrawal and withholding of life-support in terminally ill patients. Part I. Solnick PB Med Law; 1984; 3(4):309-32. PubMed ID: 6541741 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Discontinuing nutrition support: a review of the case law. Dresser R J Am Diet Assoc; 1985 Oct; 85(10):1289-92. PubMed ID: 3930592 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Post-Saikewicz judicial actions clarify the rights of patients and families. Glantz LH Medicoleg News; 1978; 6(4):9-11. PubMed ID: 10240215 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. When judges err. Roy DJ J Palliat Care; 1996; 12(2):3-5. PubMed ID: 8708848 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Reconciling Quinlan and Saikewicz: decision making for the terminally ill incompetent. Annas GJ Am J Law Med; 1979; 4(4):367-96. PubMed ID: 507056 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Does it make clinical sense to equate terminally ill patients who require life-sustaining interventions with those who do not? Alpers A; Lo B JAMA; 1997 Jun; 277(21):1705-8. PubMed ID: 9169898 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Withdrawal and withholding of life-support in terminally ill patients. Part I. Solnick PB Med Law; 1984 Sep; 3(4):303-32. PubMed ID: 11651779 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Decisionmaking for the incompetent terminally ill patient: a compromise in a solution eliminates a compromise of patients' rights. Knezevich CA Indiana Law J; 1982; 57(2):325-48. PubMed ID: 11649706 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. More on appropriate decision making for the terminally ill incompetent patient. Norris JA Am J Law Med; 1979; 5(2):i-vi. PubMed ID: 507059 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The "Uniform Rights of the Terminally Ill Act": a critical analysis. Marzen TJ Issues Law Med; 1986 May; 1(6):441-75. PubMed ID: 3636288 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]