174 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4038791)
1. High cesarean section rate: a new perspective.
Porreco RP
Obstet Gynecol; 1985 Mar; 65(3):307-11. PubMed ID: 4038791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Changing primary cesarean section patterns at a private hospital.
Farb HF
J Reprod Med; 1980 Dec; 25(6):298-303. PubMed ID: 7205796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Caesarean birth rates worldwide. A search for determinants.
van Roosmalen J; van der Does CD
Trop Geogr Med; 1995; 47(1):19-22. PubMed ID: 7747325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Changing indications for cesarean section. A 38-year experience at a community hospital.
Haddad H; Lundy LE
Obstet Gynecol; 1978 Feb; 51(2):133-7. PubMed ID: 622222
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Meeting the challenge of the rising cesarean birth rate.
Porreco RP
Obstet Gynecol; 1990 Jan; 75(1):133-6. PubMed ID: 2296410
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of vaginal and cesarean section delivery for fetuses in breech presentation.
Ismail MA; Nagib N; Ismail T; Cibils LA
J Perinat Med; 1999; 27(5):339-51. PubMed ID: 10642954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Labor management following previous cesarean section].
Lahousen M; Burmucic R
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd; 1986 Mar; 46(3):170-3. PubMed ID: 3699432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of indication for previous cesarean section on subsequent delivery outcome in patients undergoing a trial of labor.
Clark SL; Eglinton GS; Beall M; Phelan JP
J Reprod Med; 1984 Jan; 29(1):22-5. PubMed ID: 6708015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Vaginal delivery for the selected frank breech infant at term.
Watson WJ; Benson WL
Obstet Gynecol; 1984 Nov; 64(5):638-40. PubMed ID: 6493656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Vaginal delivery after cesarean section: a five-year study.
Jarrell MA; Ashmead GG; Mann LI
Obstet Gynecol; 1985 May; 65(5):628-32. PubMed ID: 3982739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The cesarean delivery rate can be safely reduced in a developing country.
de Muylder X; Thiery M
Obstet Gynecol; 1990 Mar; 75(3 Pt 1):360-4. PubMed ID: 2304708
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A successful program to lower cesarean-section rates.
Myers SA; Gleicher N
N Engl J Med; 1988 Dec; 319(23):1511-6. PubMed ID: 3185675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The Jordanian cesarean section rate.
Hindawi IM; Meri ZB
Saudi Med J; 2004 Nov; 25(11):1631-5. PubMed ID: 15573191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cesarean section: analysis of the experience before and after the National Consensus Conference on Aspects of Cesarean Birth.
Soliman SR; Burrows RF
CMAJ; 1993 Apr; 148(8):1315-20. PubMed ID: 8462053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Correlation of decrease in perinatal mortality and increase in cesarean section rates.
O'Driscoll K; Foley M
Obstet Gynecol; 1983 Jan; 61(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 6823339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The rising cesarean section rate: can it safely be reversed?
Minkoff HL; Schwarz RH
Obstet Gynecol; 1980 Aug; 56(2):135-43. PubMed ID: 7393501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cesarean section in the primigravid.
Mesleh RA; Asiri F; Al-Naim MF
Saudi Med J; 2000 Oct; 21(10):957-9. PubMed ID: 11369962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Breech deliveries and cesarean section.
Papp Z
J Perinat Med; 2003; 31(5):415-9. PubMed ID: 14601264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Reasons for the rising cesarean delivery rates: 1978-1984.
Shiono PH; McNellis D; Rhoads GG
Obstet Gynecol; 1987 May; 69(5):696-700. PubMed ID: 3574796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Management of low birth weight breech delivery: should cesarean section be routine?
Kauppila O; Grönroos M; Aro P; Aittoniemi P; Kuoppala M
Obstet Gynecol; 1981 Mar; 57(3):289-94. PubMed ID: 7465142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
