These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4043572)

  • 1. Older persons' performance on auditory, visual, and auditory-visual presentations of the Edgerton and Danhauer Nonsense Syllable Test.
    Danhauer JL; Garnett CM; Edgerton BJ
    Ear Hear; 1985; 6(4):191-7. PubMed ID: 4043572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Performance on a nonsense syllable test for normal and hearing-impaired subjects.
    Danhauer JL; Hiller SM; Edgerton BJ
    J Aud Res; 1984 Jul; 24(3):165-73. PubMed ID: 6545536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Visual speech alters the discrimination and identification of non-intact auditory speech in children with hearing loss.
    Jerger S; Damian MF; McAlpine RP; Abdi H
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2017 Mar; 94():127-137. PubMed ID: 28167003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Audiovisual integration and lipreading abilities of older adults with normal and impaired hearing.
    Tye-Murray N; Sommers MS; Spehar B
    Ear Hear; 2007 Sep; 28(5):656-68. PubMed ID: 17804980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Auditory-visual speech recognition by hearing-impaired subjects: consonant recognition, sentence recognition, and auditory-visual integration.
    Grant KW; Walden BE; Seitz PF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 May; 103(5 Pt 1):2677-90. PubMed ID: 9604361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. English, Spanish, and bilingual speakers' performance on a nonsense syllable test (NST) of speech sound discrimination.
    Danhauer JL; Crawford S; Edgerton BJ
    J Speech Hear Disord; 1984 May; 49(2):164-8. PubMed ID: 6716988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Hearing-impaired children's performance on the Edgerton and Danhauer Nonsense Syllable Test.
    Danhauer JL; Johnson C; Asp CW
    J Aud Res; 1984 Oct; 24(4):231-8. PubMed ID: 6545891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Validating a Method to Assess Lipreading, Audiovisual Gain, and Integration During Speech Reception With Cochlear-Implanted and Normal-Hearing Subjects Using a Talking Head.
    Schreitmüller S; Frenken M; Bentz L; Ortmann M; Walger M; Meister H
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(3):503-516. PubMed ID: 29068860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Measures of auditory-visual integration in nonsense syllables and sentences.
    Grant KW; Seitz PF
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1998 Oct; 104(4):2438-50. PubMed ID: 10491705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Consonant-recognition patterns and self-assessment of hearing handicap.
    Hustedde CG; Wiley TL
    J Speech Hear Res; 1991 Dec; 34(6):1397-409. PubMed ID: 1787721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Auditory pattern perception in the profoundly hearing impaired and lipreading of Dutch phonemes.
    van Son N; Bosman AJ; Lamoré PJ; Smoorenburg GF
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1993; 38():111-23. PubMed ID: 8153557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Auditory-visual speech perception and auditory-visual enhancement in normal-hearing younger and older adults.
    Sommers MS; Tye-Murray N; Spehar B
    Ear Hear; 2005 Jun; 26(3):263-75. PubMed ID: 15937408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Impact of visual cues on directional benefit and preference: Part I--laboratory tests.
    Wu YH; Bentler RA
    Ear Hear; 2010 Feb; 31(1):22-34. PubMed ID: 19864954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. How hearing aids, background noise, and visual cues influence objective listening effort.
    Picou EM; Ricketts TA; Hornsby BW
    Ear Hear; 2013 Sep; 34(5):e52-64. PubMed ID: 23416751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Practice effects for normal listeners' performance on a nonsense syllable test.
    Edgerton BJ; Danhauer JL; Rizzo S
    J Aud Res; 1981 Apr; 21(2):125-31. PubMed ID: 7052802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Children use visual speech to compensate for non-intact auditory speech.
    Jerger S; Damian MF; Tye-Murray N; Abdi H
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2014 Oct; 126():295-312. PubMed ID: 24974346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. New developments in speech pattern element hearing aids for the profoundly deaf.
    Faulkner A; Walliker JR; Howard IS; Ball V; Fourcin AJ
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1993; 38():124-35. PubMed ID: 8153558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Nonsense syllable test (NST) results and hearing loss.
    Butts FM; Ruth RR; Schoeny ZG
    Ear Hear; 1987 Feb; 8(1):44-8. PubMed ID: 3556810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Relationships among speech perception, production, language, hearing loss, and age in children with impaired hearing.
    Blamey PJ; Sarant JZ; Paatsch LE; Barry JG; Bow CP; Wales RJ; Wright M; Psarros C; Rattigan K; Tooher R
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2001 Apr; 44(2):264-85. PubMed ID: 11324650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Benefit from visual cues in auditory-visual speech recognition by middle-aged and elderly persons.
    Walden BE; Busacco DA; Montgomery AA
    J Speech Hear Res; 1993 Apr; 36(2):431-6. PubMed ID: 8487533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.