These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4045376)

  • 1. The effects of chlorpromazine and imipramine on rate and stimulus control of matching to sample.
    Newland MC; Marr MJ
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1985 Jul; 44(1):49-68. PubMed ID: 4045376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of chlorpromazine on fixed-ratio responding: modification by fixed-interval discriminative stimuli.
    Witkin JM
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1986 Mar; 45(2):195-205. PubMed ID: 3958665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of chlorpromazine in the pigeon under a second-order schedule of food presentation.
    Marr MJ
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1970 May; 13(3):291-9. PubMed ID: 5483824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effects of chlorpromazine and d-amphetamine on observing responses during a fixed-interval schedule.
    Branch MN
    Psychopharmacologia; 1975 Apr; 42(1):87-93. PubMed ID: 1153626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Conjunctive schedules of reinforcement. I. Rate-dependent effects of pentobarbital and d-amphetamine.
    Barrett JE
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1974 Nov; 22(3):561-73. PubMed ID: 4436616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of morphine on temporal discrimination and color matching: general disruption of stimulus control or selective effects on timing?
    Ward RD; Odum AL
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2005 Nov; 84(3):401-15. PubMed ID: 16596972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Drug effects on multiple and alternating mixed-schedule performance.
    Leander JD
    J Pharmacol Exp Ther; 1981 Sep; 218(3):728-33. PubMed ID: 7264956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of d-amphetamine on responding under second-order schedules of reinforcement with paired and nonpaired brief stimuli.
    Cohen SL
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1991 Sep; 56(2):289-302. PubMed ID: 1955818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparison of the effects of d-amphetamine, cocaine, imipramine and pentobarbital on local and overall rates of responding maintained under a four-component multiple fixed-interval schedule.
    Zuccarelli RR; Barrett JE
    Pharmacol Biochem Behav; 1980 Jun; 12(6):899-907. PubMed ID: 7403205
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Drugs and punished responding. I. Rate-dependent effects under multiple schedules.
    McMillan DE
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1973 Jan; 19(1):133-45. PubMed ID: 4706233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Transfer of hue matching in pigeons.
    Urcuioli PJ; Nevin JA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1975 Sep; 24(2):149-55. PubMed ID: 1206332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Matching, maximizing, and the behavioral unit: concurrent reinforcement of response sequences.
    Fetterman JG; Stubbs DA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1982 Jan; 37(1):97-114. PubMed ID: 7057132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Preferences among stimulus matches in the pigeon.
    Pisacreta R
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1982 Sep; 38(2):191-9. PubMed ID: 6890092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Food-paired stimuli as conditioned reinforcers: effects of d-amphetamine.
    Cohen SL; Branch MN
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1991 Sep; 56(2):277-88. PubMed ID: 1955817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Signal functions in delayed discriminative stimulus control by reinforcement sources.
    Kuroda T; Lattal KA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2014 May; 101(3):355-72. PubMed ID: 24700527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Contrasting baseline-dependent effects of amphetamine, chlorpromazine and scopolamine on response switching in the pigeon.
    Evenden JL
    Psychopharmacology (Berl); 1986; 89(4):421-7. PubMed ID: 3092272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Pausing as an operant: choice and discriminated responding.
    Craig AR; Lattal KA; Hall EG
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2014 Mar; 101(2):230-45. PubMed ID: 24436113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparison of responding maintained under second-order schedules of intramuscular cocaine injection or food presentation in squirrel monkeys.
    Katz JL
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1979 Nov; 32(3):419-31. PubMed ID: 117071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Resistance to change of forgetting functions and response rates.
    Odum AL; Shahan TA; Nevin JA
    J Exp Anal Behav; 2005 Jul; 84(1):65-75. PubMed ID: 16156137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Alternative reinforcement increases resistance to change: Pavlovian or operant contingencies?
    Nevin JA; Tota ME; Torquato RD; Shull RL
    J Exp Anal Behav; 1990 May; 53(3):359-79. PubMed ID: 2341820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.