These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4045611)

  • 21. Adolescent mothers and their children: changes in maternal characteristics and child developmental and behavioral outcome at school age.
    Camp BW
    J Dev Behav Pediatr; 1996 Jun; 17(3):162-9. PubMed ID: 8783062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Developmental screening in young children with sickle cell disease. Results of a cooperative study.
    Wang WC; Grover R; Gallagher D; Espeland M; Fandal A
    Am J Pediatr Hematol Oncol; 1993 Feb; 15(1):87-91. PubMed ID: 7680549
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Ratio developmental quotients from the Bayley are comparable to later IQs from the Stanford-Binet.
    Goldstein DJ; Sheaffer CI
    Am J Ment Retard; 1988 Jan; 92(4):379-80. PubMed ID: 3342140
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Evaluation of neurodevelopment of children with congenital hypothyroidism by the Denver Developmental Screening Test.
    Buluş AD; Tiftik E
    J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab; 2017 Oct; 30(10):1061-1066. PubMed ID: 28917084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Standardization of the Denver developmental screening test for Israeli children.
    Shapira Y; Harel S
    Isr J Med Sci; 1983 Mar; 19(3):246-51. PubMed ID: 6189803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [A simple method for monitoring psychological and motor development in children from three to six years of age: the Denver Developmental Screening Test (DDST)].
    Sénécal J; Bouchard C; Roussey M; Defawe G
    Ann Pediatr (Paris); 1982 Jun; 29(6):403-10. PubMed ID: 7125502
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The Stanford-Binet, Fourth Edition: a small study of concurrent validity.
    Hollinger CL; Baldwin C
    Psychol Rep; 1990 Jun; 66(3 Pt 2):1331-6. PubMed ID: 2385722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Differential validity of the K-ABC for lower functioning preschool children versus those of higher ability.
    Bloom AS; Allard AM; Zelko FA; Brill WJ; Topinka CW; Pfohl W
    Am J Ment Retard; 1988 Nov; 93(3):273-7. PubMed ID: 3228519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Individual differences in young children's IQ: a social-developmental perspective.
    Crandell LE; Hobson RP
    J Child Psychol Psychiatry; 1999 Mar; 40(3):455-64. PubMed ID: 10190346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Validity and Reliability Determination of Denver Developmental Screening Test-II in 0-6 Year-Olds in Tehran.
    Shahshahani S; Vameghi R; Azari N; Sajedi F; Kazemnejad A
    Iran J Pediatr; 2010 Sep; 20(3):313-22. PubMed ID: 23056723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Comparison of McCarthy General Cognitive Indexes and Stanford-Binet IQs for educable mentally retarded children.
    Naglieri JA; Harrison PL
    Percept Mot Skills; 1979 Jun; 48(3 Pt 2):1251-4. PubMed ID: 492899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Parent's Evaluation of Developmental Status (PEDS) detects developmental problems compared to Denver II.
    Theeranate K; Chuengchitraks S
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2005 Nov; 88 Suppl 3():S188-92. PubMed ID: 16862679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Accuracy of the Denver-II in developmental screening.
    Glascoe FP; Byrne KE; Ashford LG; Johnson KL; Chang B; Strickland B
    Pediatrics; 1992 Jun; 89(6 Pt 2):1221-5. PubMed ID: 1375732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Reliability and validity of ratio developmental quotients from the Cattell Infant Intelligence Scale.
    Atkinson L
    Am J Ment Retard; 1990 Sep; 95(2):215-9. PubMed ID: 1699557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Screening 5 and 6 year-old children starting primary school for development and language.
    Yılmaz D; Bayar-Muluk N; Bayoğlu B; İdil A; Anlar B
    Turk J Pediatr; 2016; 58(2):136-144. PubMed ID: 27976553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The predictive validity of a simple two item developmental screening test for three year olds.
    Silva PA
    N Z Med J; 1981 Jan; 93(676):39-41. PubMed ID: 6164968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A continuous-scale measure of child development for population-based epidemiological surveys: a preliminary study using Item Response Theory for the Denver Test.
    Drachler Mde L; Marshall T; de Carvalho Leite JC
    Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol; 2007 Mar; 21(2):138-53. PubMed ID: 17302643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Can developmental screening tests identify children who are developmentally at risk?
    Meisels SJ
    Pediatrics; 1989 Apr; 83(4):578-85. PubMed ID: 2467250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Prediction of five-year Stanford-Binet scores in preterm infants.
    Cohen SE; Parmelee AH
    Child Dev; 1983 Oct; 54(5):1242-53. PubMed ID: 6354631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Effectiveness of the Denver Developmental Screening Test with biologically vulnerable infants.
    Sciarillo WG; Brown MM; Robinson NM; Bennett FC; Sells CJ
    J Dev Behav Pediatr; 1986 Apr; 7(2):77-83. PubMed ID: 2422216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.