These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4045988)

  • 21. Differences in QRS axis measurements, classification of inferior myocardial infarction, and noise tolerance for 12-lead electrocardiograms acquired from monitoring electrode positions compared to standard locations.
    Welinder A; Wagner GS; Maynard C; Pahlm O
    Am J Cardiol; 2010 Aug; 106(4):581-6. PubMed ID: 20691320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Improvement of automated electrocardiographic diagnosis by combination of computer interpretations of the electrocardiogram and vectorcardiogram.
    Kors JA; van Herpen G; Willems JL; van Bemmel JH
    Am J Cardiol; 1992 Jul; 70(1):96-9. PubMed ID: 1615877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Stability of computer ECG amplitude measurements in the presence of noise. The CSE Working Party.
    Zywietz C; Willems JL; Arnaud P; van Bemmel JH; Degani R; Macfarlane PW
    Comput Biomed Res; 1990 Feb; 23(1):10-31. PubMed ID: 2306932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Stability of ECG amplitude measurements in systematic noise tests. Results and recommendations from the CSE project.
    Zywietz C; Willems JL
    J Electrocardiol; 1987 Oct; 20 Suppl():61-7. PubMed ID: 3694103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The spatial QRS-T angle outperforms the Italian and Seattle ECG-based criteria for detection of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy in pediatric patients.
    Cortez D; Sharma N; Cavanaugh J; Tuozo F; Derk G; Lundberg E; Schlegel TT; Weiner K; Kiciman N; Alejos J; Landeck B; Aboulhosn J; Miyamoto S; Batra A; McCanta AC
    J Electrocardiol; 2015; 48(5):826-33. PubMed ID: 26275983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The value of different electrocardiographic depolarization criteria in the diagnosis of arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia/cardiomyopathy.
    Peters S; Trümmel M; Koehler B; Westermann KU
    J Electrocardiol; 2007 Jan; 40(1):34-7. PubMed ID: 17118392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Analysis of discrepancies between VCG and ECG interpretation of anterior wall myocardial infarction.
    Yamauchi K; Segal M; Tatematsu H; Simonson E
    J Electrocardiol; 1977 Apr; 10(2):171-8. PubMed ID: 858977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The diagnostic performance of computer programs for the interpretation of electrocardiograms.
    Willems JL; Abreu-Lima C; Arnaud P; van Bemmel JH; Brohet C; Degani R; Denis B; Gehring J; Graham I; van Herpen G
    N Engl J Med; 1991 Dec; 325(25):1767-73. PubMed ID: 1834940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Evaluation of ECG interpretation systems: signal analysis.
    Zywietz C; van Bemmel JH; Degani R
    Methods Inf Med; 1990 Sep; 29(4):298-307. PubMed ID: 2233376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The performance of three visual coding procedures and three computer programs in classification of electrocardiograms according to the Minnesota Code.
    Tuinstra CL; Rautaharju PM; Prineas RJ; Duisterhout JS
    J Electrocardiol; 1982 Oct; 15(4):345-50. PubMed ID: 6897261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Evaluation of ST segment elevation criteria for the prehospital electrocardiographic diagnosis fo acute myocardial infarction.
    Otto LA; Aufderheide TP
    Ann Emerg Med; 1994 Jan; 23(1):17-24. PubMed ID: 8273952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Improved electrocardiographic criteria for the diagnosis of inferior myocardial infarction.
    Warner R; Hill NE; Sheehe PR; Mookherjee S; Fruehan CT; Smulyan H
    Circulation; 1982 Aug; 66(2):422-8. PubMed ID: 7094249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Performance of electrocardiographic criteria to differentiate Takotsubo cardiomyopathy from acute anterior ST elevation myocardial infarction.
    Johnson NP; Chavez JF; Mosley WJ; Flaherty JD; Fox JM
    Int J Cardiol; 2013 Apr; 164(3):345-8. PubMed ID: 21802749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Artificial neural networks for the electrocardiographic diagnosis of healed myocardial infarction.
    Hedén B; Edenbrandt L; Haisty WK; Pahlm O
    Am J Cardiol; 1994 Jul; 74(1):5-8. PubMed ID: 8017306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Comparative reproducibility of QT, QT peak, and T peak-T end intervals and dispersion in normal subjects, patients with myocardial infarction, and patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.
    Savelieva I; Yap YG; Yi G; Guo X; Camm AJ; Malik M
    Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1998 Nov; 21(11 Pt 2):2376-81. PubMed ID: 9825351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Derivation of the 12-lead electrocardiogram and 3-lead vectorcardiogram.
    Schreck DM; Fishberg RD
    Am J Emerg Med; 2013 Aug; 31(8):1183-90. PubMed ID: 23810076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Defining unrecognized myocardial infarction: a call for standardized electrocardiographic diagnostic criteria.
    Ammar KA; Kors JA; Yawn BP; Rodeheffer RJ
    Am Heart J; 2004 Aug; 148(2):277-84. PubMed ID: 15308997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Electrocardiographic tall R waves in the right precordial leads. Comparison of recently proposed ECG and VCG criteria for distinguishing posterolateral myocardial infarction from prominent anterior forces in normal subjects.
    Zema MJ
    J Electrocardiol; 1990 Apr; 23(2):147-56. PubMed ID: 2341816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A computer program for the analysis of serial electrocardiograms from patients who suffered a myocardial infarction.
    van Haelst AC; Donker DK; Visser FC; de Cock CC; Hasman A; Talmon JL
    Int J Biomed Comput; 1985 Nov; 17(3-4):273-84. PubMed ID: 3841340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Reference standards for software evaluation.
    Michaelis J; Wellek S; Willems JL
    Methods Inf Med; 1990 Sep; 29(4):289-97. PubMed ID: 2233375
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.