These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
67 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 404609)
1. A thorough look at PEP worksheet 3. Fifer WR QRB Qual Rev Bull; 1977 Mar; 3(3):5-10, 31. PubMed ID: 404609 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Conferences on the diagnostic and therapeutic aspects of patient care based on peer review of the problem oriented record. Valberg LS; Morrin PA; Marks GS; Clark A; Southall GA Can Med Assoc J; 1974 Oct; 111(7):693-5. PubMed ID: 4412585 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Topic of cancer. Clinical comments and critique of an audit of urinary bladder tumors. Fifer WR QRB Qual Rev Bull; 1977 Jan; 3(1):11-9. PubMed ID: 402621 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. A progress report on the medical audit study. Waldman ML Hosp Prog; 1975 Aug; 56(8):59-64. PubMed ID: 1150213 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Much ado about nothing: critique of an endless audit of cholecystectomy. Fifer WR QRB Qual Rev Bull; 1978 Jun; 4(6):13-22. PubMed ID: 104240 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The problem-oriented medical record (POMR). Rakel RE Am Fam Physician; 1974 Sep; 10(3):100-11. PubMed ID: 4416438 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Peer review--continued competence--standards of practice. Barros A Am J Med Technol; 1978 May; 44(5):406-9. PubMed ID: 567010 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Management criteria, documentation, and peer review of initial urinary tract infection. Margileth AM; Thompson HC; Osborne CE Pediatrics; 1976 May; 57(5):754-9. PubMed ID: 940715 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Conceptual framework for drug usage review, medical audit and other patient care review procedures. Stolar MH Am J Hosp Pharm; 1977 Feb; 34(2):139-45. PubMed ID: 842543 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Adapting AMA/PSRO model screening criteria to PEP: pulmonary tuberculosis. Buckingham WB QRB Qual Rev Bull; 1976 Apr; 2(4):26-30. PubMed ID: 823493 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Variations in the ability of general medical practitioners to apply two methods of clinical audit: A five-year study of assessment by peer review. McKay J; Bowie P; Lough M J Eval Clin Pract; 2006 Dec; 12(6):622-9. PubMed ID: 17100861 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Adapting AMA/PSRO model screening criteria to PEP: pulmonary embolism or infarction. Buckingham WB QRB Qual Rev Bull; 1976 May; 2(5):23-8. PubMed ID: 823499 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Physician performance in a prepaid health plan: results of the peer review program of the Health Insurance Plan of Greater New York. Deuschle JM; Alvarez B; Logsdon DN; Stahl WM; Smith H Med Care; 1982 Feb; 20(2):127-42. PubMed ID: 7078277 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Medical audit or peer review in Australian hospitals. Wilson LL World Med J; 1979; 26(3):45-8. PubMed ID: 10243742 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. MMA peer review program to monitor quality of care. Hanson PC Minn Med; 1993 Apr; 76(4):31-3. PubMed ID: 8515734 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Plans form the basis for many of your PI activities. Here are four of the plans JCAHO requires. Spath P Hosp Peer Rev; 1999 Sep; 24(9):144-6. PubMed ID: 10558183 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Guidelines for care of the dying patient: an interdisciplinary effort. Schroeder MR Continuum; 1997; 17(2):1, 3-10. PubMed ID: 10167253 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]