These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4046559)

  • 1. The effect of conformity and plastic thickness on contact stresses in metal-backed plastic implants.
    Bartel DL; Burstein AH; Toda MD; Edwards DL
    J Biomech Eng; 1985 Aug; 107(3):193-9. PubMed ID: 4046559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of conformity, thickness, and material on stresses in ultra-high molecular weight components for total joint replacement.
    Bartel DL; Bicknell VL; Wright TM
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1986 Sep; 68(7):1041-51. PubMed ID: 3745241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Contact stresses in the glenoid component in total shoulder arthroplasty.
    Swieszkowski W; Bednarz P; Prendergast PJ
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2003; 217(1):49-57. PubMed ID: 12578219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of interface stresses and strains for onlay and inlay unicompartmental tibial components.
    Walker PS; Parakh DS; Chaudhary ME; Wei CS
    J Knee Surg; 2011 Jun; 24(2):109-15. PubMed ID: 21874946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Wear in the prosthetic shoulder: association with design parameters.
    Hopkins AR; Hansen UN; Amis AA; Knight L; Taylor M; Levy O; Copeland SA
    J Biomech Eng; 2007 Apr; 129(2):223-30. PubMed ID: 17408327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The role of backside polishing, cup angle, and polyethylene thickness on the contact stresses in metal-backed acetabular components.
    Kurtz SM; Edidin AA; Bartel DL
    J Biomech; 1997 Jun; 30(6):639-42. PubMed ID: 9165399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Stresses in polyethylene components of contemporary total knee replacements.
    Bartel DL; Rawlinson JJ; Burstein AH; Ranawat CS; Flynn WF
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1995 Aug; (317):76-82. PubMed ID: 7671500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Contact mechanics of metal-on-metal hip implants employing a metallic cup with a UHMWPE backing.
    Liu F; Jin ZM; Grigoris P; Hirt F; Rieker C
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2003; 217(3):207-13. PubMed ID: 12807161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Stress analysis of glenoid component designs for shoulder arthroplasty.
    Lacroix D; Prendergast PJ
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 1997; 211(6):467-74. PubMed ID: 9509884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Pelvic stresses in vitro--II. A study of the efficacy of metal-backed acetabular prostheses.
    Finlay JB; Bourne RB; Landsberg RP; Andreae P
    J Biomech; 1986; 19(9):715-25. PubMed ID: 3793746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Laboratory evaluation of a metal-plastic type of metacarpophalangeal joint prosthesis.
    Walker PS; Erkman MJ
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1975 Oct; (112):349-56. PubMed ID: 1192646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Flat medial-lateral conformity in total knee replacements does not minimize contact stresses.
    Rawlinson JJ; Bartel DL
    J Biomech; 2002 Jan; 35(1):27-34. PubMed ID: 11747880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Mechanical loading characteristics of total hip prosthetics subjected to dynamic loading cycles.
    Kalayarasan M; Shankar S; Manikandan M; Adithan K
    Biomed Mater Eng; 2018; 29(6):723-737. PubMed ID: 30282330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Analysis of an early intervention distal femoral resurfacing implant for medial osteoarthritis.
    Chaudhary M; Walker PS
    J Biomech; 2016 Nov; 49(15):3676-3681. PubMed ID: 28029358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Making simulation tests for hip joint prostheses more exact].
    Gatti A; Trentani C
    Chir Organi Mov; 1977; 63(6):543-50. PubMed ID: 616389
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cemented polyethylene versus uncemented metal-backed glenoid components in total shoulder arthroplasty: a prospective, double-blind, randomized study.
    Boileau P; Avidor C; Krishnan SG; Walch G; Kempf JF; Molé D
    J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2002; 11(4):351-9. PubMed ID: 12195253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Experimental validation of finite element modelling of a modular metal-on-polyethylene total hip replacement.
    Hua X; Wang L; Al-Hajjar M; Jin Z; Wilcox RK; Fisher J
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2014 Jul; 228(7):682-92. PubMed ID: 24963036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of contact stress in metal-backed patellar replacements. A predictor of survivorship.
    Buechel FF; Pappas MJ; Makris G
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1991 Dec; (273):190-7. PubMed ID: 1959271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Analysis of elastohydrodynamic lubrication in McKee-Farrar metal-on-metal hip joint replacement.
    Yew A; Udofia I; Jagatia M; Jin ZM
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2004; 218(1):27-34. PubMed ID: 14982343
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Prediction of contact mechanics in metal-on-metal Total Hip Replacement for parametrically comprehensive designs and loads.
    Donaldson FE; Nyman E; Coburn JC
    J Biomech; 2015 Jul; 48(10):1828-35. PubMed ID: 25980556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.