These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4046580)

  • 1. Probe-determined hearing-aid gain compared to functional and coupler gains.
    Zemplenyi J; Dirks D; Gilman S
    J Speech Hear Res; 1985 Sep; 28(3):394-404. PubMed ID: 4046580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evaluation of the Repeatability and Accuracy of the Wideband Real-Ear-to-Coupler Difference.
    Vaisberg JM; Folkeard P; Pumford J; Narten P; Scollie S
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2018 Jun; 29(6):520-532. PubMed ID: 29863466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of hearing-aid gain using functional, coupler, and probe-tube measurements.
    Mason D; Popelka GR
    J Speech Hear Res; 1986 Jun; 29(2):218-26. PubMed ID: 3724114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A probe earmold system for measuring eardrum SPL under hearing-aid conditions.
    Gilman S; Dirks DD
    Scand Audiol; 1984; 13(1):15-22. PubMed ID: 6719011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of earmold fit on predicted real ear SPL using a real ear to coupler difference procedure.
    Hoover BM; Stelmachowicz PG; Lewis DE
    Ear Hear; 2000 Aug; 21(4):310-7. PubMed ID: 10981607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Using the Real-Ear-to-Coupler Difference within the American Academy of Audiology Pediatric Amplification Guideline: Protocols for Applying and Predicting Earmold RECDs.
    Moodie S; Pietrobon J; Rall E; Lindley G; Eiten L; Gordey D; Davidson L; Moodie KS; Bagatto M; Haluschak MM; Folkeard P; Scollie S
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2016 Mar; 27(3):264-275. PubMed ID: 26967366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Accuracy of predicted ear canal speech levels using the VIOLA input/output-based fitting strategy.
    Cox RM; Flamme GA
    Ear Hear; 1998 Apr; 19(2):139-48. PubMed ID: 9562536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Test-retest reliability of probe-microphone verification in children fitted with open and closed hearing aid tips.
    Kim H; Ricketts TA
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013; 24(7):635-42. PubMed ID: 24047950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Measuring in-the-ear gain of hearing aids by the acoustic reflex method.
    Tonisson W
    J Speech Hear Res; 1975 Mar; 18(1):17-30. PubMed ID: 1127901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Clinical measurement of hearing aid insertion gain.
    Pedersen B; Lauridsen O; Birk Nielsen H
    Scand Audiol; 1982; 11(3):181-6. PubMed ID: 7178818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Earmold modification effect measured by coupler, threshold and probe techniques.
    Studebaker GA; Cox RM; Wark DJ
    Audiology; 1978; 17(2):173-86. PubMed ID: 646735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A simplified real ear technique for verifying the maximum output of a hearing aid.
    Harford E; Leijon A; Lidén G; Ringdahl A; Dahlberg AK
    Ear Hear; 1983; 4(3):130-7. PubMed ID: 6862114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Acoustic resonators in the coupler and in the ear.
    Hayes D
    Scand Audiol; 1993; 22(3):187-91. PubMed ID: 8210958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Feasibility of High-Resolution Computed Tomography Imaging for Obtaining Ear Impressions for Hearing Aid Fitting.
    Chen CK; Hsieh LC; Chiang YC; Cheng WD
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2019 Oct; 161(4):666-671. PubMed ID: 31060451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Relationship of acoustic gain to aided threshold improvement in children.
    Jirsa RE; Norris TW
    J Speech Hear Disord; 1978 Aug; 43(3):348-52. PubMed ID: 692100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Speech understanding and directional hearing for hearing-impaired subjects with in-the-ear and behind-the-ear hearing aids.
    Leeuw AR; Dreschler WA
    Scand Audiol; 1987; 16(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 3589478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparison of functional gain and 2 cm3 coupler gain.
    Hawkins DB; Haskell GB
    J Speech Hear Disord; 1982 Feb; 47(1):71-6. PubMed ID: 7176579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Pure-Tone Audiometry With Forward Pressure Level Calibration Leads to Clinically-Relevant Improvements in Test-Retest Reliability.
    Lapsley Miller JA; Reed CM; Robinson SR; Perez ZD
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(5):946-957. PubMed ID: 29470259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sound levels in a 2-cc cavity, a Zwislocki coupler, and occluded ear canals.
    Larson VD; Studebaker GA; Cox RM
    J Am Audiol Soc; 1977; 3(2):63-70. PubMed ID: 914674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The reliability of insertion gain measurements using probe microphones in the ear canal.
    Ringdahl A; Leijon A
    Scand Audiol; 1984; 13(3):173-8. PubMed ID: 6494803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.