These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

91 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4046637)

  • 1. A new porcine bioprosthesis: in vitro and in vivo evaluation.
    Reece IJ; Anderson JD; Wain WH; Carr K; Toner PG; Tindale W; Black MM; Wheatley DJ
    Life Support Syst; 1985; 3(3):207-27. PubMed ID: 4046637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Wear patterns in the Sorin Bicarbon mechanical heart valve: a clinical explant study.
    Hasenkam JM; Pasquino E; Stacchino C; Arru P; Vallana F; Paulsen PK
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1997 Mar; 6(2):105-14. PubMed ID: 9130116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Harvested porcine mitral xenograft fixation: impact on fluid dynamic performance.
    Jensen MO; Lemmon JD; Gessaghi VC; Conrad CP; Levine RA; Yoganathan AP
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2001 Jan; 10(1):111-24. PubMed ID: 11206757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Hemodynamic performance of newly developed composite stentless porcine aortic valve: in vitro testing and in vivo experiment with sheep].
    Song GM; Zhou JY; Hu SS; Cui JW; Song YH; Tang Y; Zhang Y; Jiang H; Yuan WM; Song XY
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2008 Jul; 88(29):2059-63. PubMed ID: 19080436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparative in vitro evaluation of porcine and pericardial bioprostheses.
    Reul H; Giersiepen M; Schindehütte H; Effert S; Rau G
    Z Kardiol; 1986; 75 Suppl 2():223-31. PubMed ID: 3727690
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Hemodynamic performance of the Ionescu-Shiley valve prosthesis.
    Becker RM; Strom J; Frishman W; Oka Y; Lin YT; Yellin EL; Frater RW
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1980 Oct; 80(4):613-20. PubMed ID: 7421295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Porcine valves: Hancock and Carpentier-Edwards aortic prostheses.
    Fann JI; Miller DC
    Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1996 Jul; 8(3):259-68. PubMed ID: 8843517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Small aortic annulus: the hydrodynamic performances of 5 commercially available tissue valves.
    Gerosa G; Tarzia V; Rizzoli G; Bottio T
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2006 May; 131(5):1058-64. PubMed ID: 16678590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Current state of in vivo preclinical heart valve evaluation.
    Salerno CT; Droel J; Bianco RW
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1998 Mar; 7(2):158-62. PubMed ID: 9587855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Biaxial strain distributions in explanted porcine bioprosthetic valves.
    Adamczyk MM; Vesely I
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2002 Sep; 11(5):688-95. PubMed ID: 12358406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Mitral valve disease: if the mitral valve is not reparable/failed repair, is bioprosthesis suitable for replacement?
    Jamieson WR; Gudas VM; Burr LH; Janusz MT; Fradet GJ; Ling H; Germann E; Lichtenstein SV
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2009 Jan; 35(1):104-10. PubMed ID: 19056294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Haemodynamics and durability of mitral bioprostheses--an in vitro study.
    Gabbay S; Bortolotti U; Wasserman F; Factor SM
    Eur Heart J; 1984 Oct; 5 Suppl D():65-71. PubMed ID: 6240399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Introduction of a flexible polymeric heart valve prosthesis with special design for aortic position.
    Daebritz SH; Fausten B; Hermanns B; Schroeder J; Groetzner J; Autschbach R; Messmer BJ; Sachweh JS
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2004 Jun; 25(6):946-52. PubMed ID: 15144993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. St Jude Epic heart valve bioprostheses versus native human and porcine aortic valves - comparison of mechanical properties.
    Kalejs M; Stradins P; Lacis R; Ozolanta I; Pavars J; Kasyanov V
    Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2009 May; 8(5):553-6. PubMed ID: 19190025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Pathology of the Pericarbon bovine pericardial xenograft implanted in humans.
    Valente M; Ius P; Bortolotti U; Talenti E; Bottio T; Thiene G
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1998 Mar; 7(2):180-9. PubMed ID: 9587859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A new design for polyurethane heart valves.
    Butterfield M; Wheatley DJ; Williams DF; Fisher J
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2001 Jan; 10(1):105-10. PubMed ID: 11206756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of fixation back pressure and antimineralization treatment on the morphology of porcine aortic bioprosthetic valves.
    Flomenbaum MA; Schoen FJ
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1993 Jan; 105(1):154-64. PubMed ID: 8419696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparative assessment of bioprosthesis durability in the aortic position.
    Grunkemeier GL; Bodnar E
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1995 Jan; 4(1):49-55. PubMed ID: 7742990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The influence of stenting on the behavior of amino-oleic acid-treated, glutaraldehyde-fixed porcine aortic valves in a sheep model.
    Ozaki S; Herijgers P; Verbeken E; Van Lommel A; Nishida T; Perek B; Zietkiewicz M; Leunens V; Flameng W
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2000 Jul; 9(4):552-9; discussion 559-60. PubMed ID: 10947049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Hydrodynamic comparison of biological prostheses during progressive valve calcification in a simulated exercise situation. An in vitro study.
    Bakhtiary F; Dzemali O; Steinseiffer U; Schmitz C; Glasmacher B; Moritz A; Kleine P
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2008 Nov; 34(5):960-3. PubMed ID: 18774723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.