BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

96 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4047258)

  • 1. Prognostic significance of stratification systems in multiple myeloma. I. Risk categories (good and poor risk).
    Scudla V; Indrák K
    Neoplasma; 1985; 32(4):469-79. PubMed ID: 4047258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Prognostic significance of stratification systems in multiple myeloma. II. Clinical staging systems.
    Scudla V; Indrák K
    Neoplasma; 1985; 32(4):481-93. PubMed ID: 4047259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. International prognostic index (IPI)--a critical comparison with five multiple myeloma staging systems in the group of 270 patients treated by conventional chemotherapy.
    Scudla V; Zemanova M; Minarik J; Bacovsky J; Ordeltova M; Indrak K; Budikova M; Dusek L; Farbiakova V
    Neoplasma; 2006; 53(4):277-84. PubMed ID: 16830053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Comparative study of 2 prognostic classification systems for myeloma and examination of the correlation between initial bone marrow plasmacytosis and prognosis. A propos of a homogeneous population of 50 patients followed from diagnosis to death].
    Pesce A; Cassuto JP; Grisot C; Gratecos N; Bayle J; Viot G; Dujardin P
    Nouv Rev Fr Hematol (1978); 1983; 25(5):311-7. PubMed ID: 6657481
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Results of treatment of patients with advanced multiple myeloma with the vincristine-adriamycin-dexamethasone protocol].
    Marisavljević D; Bosković D; Radosević N; Elezović I; Tomin D; Gotić M; Antunović P
    Srp Arh Celok Lek; 1996; 124(11-12):292-6. PubMed ID: 9132962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Classification and prognostic evaluation in multiple myeloma. A retrospective study of relationship of survivals and responses to chemotherapy to immunological types, 20 single prognostic factors, 15 clinical staging systems, and 6 morphological classifications.
    Pasqualetti P; Colantonio D; Collacciani A; Casale R; Natali G
    Panminerva Med; 1991; 33(2):93-110. PubMed ID: 1923560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [BUN, Bence Jones protein, and chromosomal aberrations predict survival in multiple myeloma].
    Okada K; Oguchi N; Shinohara K; Tamura N; Ishii K; Noguchi Y; Hayashi S; Yamamoto H; Takeichi M; Fujimoto H; Shirota T; Hayashi T
    Rinsho Ketsueki; 1997 Dec; 38(12):1254-62. PubMed ID: 9455144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Long-term survival and prognostic factors in multiple myeloma treated with conventional chemotherapy. Report of 109 cases].
    Ben Abid H; Meddeb B; Ben Abdallah M; Bel Hadj Ali Z; Hafsia R; Ben Lakhal R; Gouider E; Aissaoui L; Landoulsi I; ben Abdeladhim A; Hafsia A
    Tunis Med; 2000 Dec; 78(12):705-12. PubMed ID: 11155374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparison of two staging systems for myeloma.
    Vercelli D; Cozzolino F; Di Guglielmo R
    Nouv Rev Fr Hematol (1978); 1981; 23(2):107-10. PubMed ID: 7290984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [A comparison of staging classifications of plasmacytoma].
    Löffler H; Gassmann W; Haferlach T; Pralle H
    Onkologie; 1986 Aug; 9(4):196, 199-201. PubMed ID: 3531946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Multiple myeloma index: verification of a new prognostic approach with evaluation of treatment response.
    Bettini R; Tonolini M; Bernasconi M
    Haematologica; 1998 Aug; 83(8):708-13. PubMed ID: 9793254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. International staging system for multiple myeloma.
    Greipp PR; San Miguel J; Durie BG; Crowley JJ; Barlogie B; Bladé J; Boccadoro M; Child JA; Avet-Loiseau H; Kyle RA; Lahuerta JJ; Ludwig H; Morgan G; Powles R; Shimizu K; Shustik C; Sonneveld P; Tosi P; Turesson I; Westin J
    J Clin Oncol; 2005 May; 23(15):3412-20. PubMed ID: 15809451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The addition of interferon or high dose cyclophosphamide to standard chemotherapy in the treatment of patients with multiple myeloma: phase III Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Clinical Trial EST 9486.
    Oken MM; Leong T; Lenhard RE; Greipp PR; Kay NE; Van Ness B; Keimowitz RM; Kyle RA
    Cancer; 1999 Sep; 86(6):957-68. PubMed ID: 10491521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Prognostic value of the new international staging system in multiple myeloma. Comparison with Durie-Salmon staging system].
    Conté L G; Figueroa M G; Lois V V; Cabrera C ME; León R A; García L H; Rojas R H
    Rev Med Chil; 2008 Jan; 136(1):7-12. PubMed ID: 18483648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of two combination chemotherapy regimens for multiple myeloma: methyl-CCNU, cyclophosphamide, and prednisone versus melphalan and prednisone.
    Cavagnaro F; Lein JM; Pavlovsky S; Becherini JO; Pileggi JE; Micheo EQ; Jait C; Musso A; Suárez A; Pizzolato M
    Cancer Treat Rep; 1980 Jan; 64(1):73-9. PubMed ID: 6991106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Prognostic factors affecting survival in multiple myeloma].
    Tornóczky J; Tóth A; Sziládi E; Hoffmann E; Liszátz M
    Orv Hetil; 1990 Aug; 131(31):1679-84. PubMed ID: 2205822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of high-dose melphalan with a more intensive regimen of thiotepa, busulfan, and cyclophosphamide for patients with multiple myeloma.
    Anagnostopoulos A; Aleman A; Ayers G; Donato M; Champlin R; Weber D; Alexanian R; Giralt S
    Cancer; 2004 Jun; 100(12):2607-12. PubMed ID: 15197803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Treatment of relapsed aggressive lymphomas: regimens with and without high-dose therapy and stem cell rescue.
    Hagemeister FB
    Cancer Chemother Pharmacol; 2002 May; 49 Suppl 1():S13-20. PubMed ID: 12042984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Prognostic significance of plasma cell propidium iodide and annexin-V indices and their mutual ratio in multiple myeloma.
    Scudla V; Ordeltova M; Minarik J; Dusek L; Zemanova M; Bacovsky J
    Neoplasma; 2006; 53(3):213-8. PubMed ID: 16652190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Achievement of at least very good partial response is a simple and robust prognostic factor in patients with multiple myeloma treated with high-dose therapy: long-term analysis of the IFM 99-02 and 99-04 Trials.
    Harousseau JL; Avet-Loiseau H; Attal M; Charbonnel C; Garban F; Hulin C; Michallet M; Facon T; Garderet L; Marit G; Ketterer N; Lamy T; Voillat L; Guilhot F; Doyen C; Mathiot C; Moreau P
    J Clin Oncol; 2009 Dec; 27(34):5720-6. PubMed ID: 19826130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.