These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4047882)

  • 21. Visual-field differences in picture-word interference.
    Lupker SJ; Sanders M
    Brain Cogn; 1982 Oct; 1(4):381-98. PubMed ID: 6927571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Relationship between recognition asymmetry and the interval between the stimuli of a dichoptic complex].
    Bagdonas A; Kochiunene N
    Zh Vyssh Nerv Deiat Im I P Pavlova; 1977; 27(4):838-46. PubMed ID: 919771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Scanning the visual field without eye movements--a sex difference.
    Efron R; Yund EW; Nichols DR
    Neuropsychologia; 1987; 25(4):637-44. PubMed ID: 3658146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Visual-field asymmetry in face recognition as a function of face discriminability and interstimulus interval.
    Sjoberg W; Gruber B; Swatloski C
    Percept Mot Skills; 1991 Jun; 72(3 Pt 2):1267-71. PubMed ID: 1961674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The asymmetry of the fusiform face area is a stable individual characteristic that underlies the left-visual-field superiority for faces.
    Yovel G; Tambini A; Brandman T
    Neuropsychologia; 2008 Nov; 46(13):3061-8. PubMed ID: 18639566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Haidinger's brushes phenomenon for control of eye-fixation in a laterality experiment.
    Yamada K; Sugano L
    Percept Mot Skills; 1988 Aug; 67(1):83-6. PubMed ID: 3211696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Embedded words in visual word recognition: does the left hemisphere see the rain in brain?
    McCormick SF; Davis CJ; Brysbaert M
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 Sep; 36(5):1256-66. PubMed ID: 20804295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Word position affects stimulus recognition: evidence for early ERP short-term plastic modulation.
    Spironelli C; Galfano G; Umiltà C; Angrilli A
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2011 Dec; 82(3):217-24. PubMed ID: 21924299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Color- and picture-word Stroop tests: performance changes in old age.
    Graf P; Uttl B; Tuokko H
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 1995 May; 17(3):390-415. PubMed ID: 7650102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Word and pseudoword superiority effects in a shallow orthography language: the role of hemispheric lateralization.
    Ripamonti E; Traficante D; Crippa F; Luzzattii C
    Percept Mot Skills; 2014 Apr; 118(2):411-28. PubMed ID: 24897877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Tactile picture recognition: errors are in shape acquistion or object matching?
    Kalia AA; Sinha P
    Seeing Perceiving; 2012; 25(3-4):287-302. PubMed ID: 21871145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. What do lateralized displays tell us about visual word perception? A cautionary indication from the word-letter effect.
    Jordan TR; Patching GR
    Neuropsychologia; 2004; 42(11):1504-14. PubMed ID: 15246288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Effects of foveal stimulation on peripheral visual processing and laterality in deaf and hearing subjects.
    Reynolds HN
    Am J Psychol; 1993; 106(4):523-40. PubMed ID: 8296925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Does order of letter analysis contribute to the parafoveal identification asymmetry?
    Chastain G
    J Gen Psychol; 1988 Oct; 115(4):397-402. PubMed ID: 3210001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The mechanisms underlying the interhemispheric integration of information in foveal word recognition: evidence for transcortical inhibition.
    Van der Haegen L; Brysbaert M
    Brain Lang; 2011 Sep; 118(3):81-9. PubMed ID: 20430428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The effects of age and sex on phonemic processing time during a picture recognition task.
    Fischbach-Kottman Y; Rastatter MP
    J Aud Res; 1984 Jan; 24(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 6543862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Support for lateralization of the Whorf effect beyond the realm of color discrimination.
    Gilbert AL; Regier T; Kay P; Ivry RB
    Brain Lang; 2008 May; 105(2):91-8. PubMed ID: 17628656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Object recognition and laterality: null effects.
    Biederman I; Cooper EE
    Neuropsychologia; 1991; 29(7):685-94. PubMed ID: 1944870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Lateralization differences for color-naming and color-matching in men and women.
    Tokar DM; Matheson NK; Haude RH
    Percept Mot Skills; 1989 Oct; 69(2):651-6. PubMed ID: 2813014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Classification of random forms and distortions presented to the left or right visual field.
    Axelrod S; Leiber L; Noonan M
    Percept Mot Skills; 1978 Oct; 47(2):615-21. PubMed ID: 724400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.