These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4048281)

  • 21. The effects of a universal wedge and beam obliquity upon the central axis dose buildup for 6-MV x rays.
    McParland BJ
    Med Phys; 1991; 18(4):740-3. PubMed ID: 1921879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Characteristics of Clinac-18 wedged fields for 10-MV x rays.
    Tolbert DD; Lane RG; Paliwal BR; Frost SW; Chin KB; Dercks J
    Med Phys; 1977; 4(5):419-22. PubMed ID: 409923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A pulse-rate dependence of dose per monitor unit and its significant effect on wedged-shaped fields delivered with variable dose rate and a moving jaw.
    Faddegon BA; Garde E
    Med Phys; 2006 Aug; 33(8):3063-5. PubMed ID: 16964884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Two-effective-source method for the calculation of in-air output at various source-to-detector distances in wedged fields.
    Kim S; Liu C; Chen C; Palta JR
    Med Phys; 1999 Jun; 26(6):949-55. PubMed ID: 10436896
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Assessment of computerized treatment planning system accuracy in calculating wedge factors of physical wedged fields for 6 MV photon beams.
    Muhammad W; Maqbool M; Shahid M; Hussain A; Tahir S; Matiullah ; Rooh G; Ahmad T; Lee SH
    Phys Med; 2011 Jul; 27(3):135-43. PubMed ID: 20655782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Effective wedge angles for 6-MV wedges.
    Zwicker RD; Shahabi S; Wu A; Sternick ES
    Med Phys; 1985; 12(3):347-9. PubMed ID: 3925309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Head-scatter factors and effective x-ray source positions in a 25-MV linear accelerator.
    Tatcher M; Bjärngard B
    Med Phys; 1992; 19(3):685-6. PubMed ID: 1508107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparison between measured and calculated dynamic wedge dose distributions using the anisotropic analytic algorithm and pencil-beam convolution.
    Caprile PF; Venencia CD; Besa P
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2006 Aug; 8(1):47-54. PubMed ID: 17592453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Dosimetry of effective wedge fields produced by an internal wedge.
    Boyer AL; Tung S; Otte V; Wells N; Steadham R
    Med Phys; 1994 Jan; 21(1):69-75. PubMed ID: 8164591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Beam-hardening effects of wedges on a spoiled 6 MV beam.
    Lee PC; Glasgow GP
    Med Dosim; 1994; 19(3):141-4. PubMed ID: 7818752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Optimizing beam weights and wedge filters with the concept of the super-omni wedge.
    Dai J; Zhu Y; Ji Q
    Med Phys; 2000 Dec; 27(12):2757-62. PubMed ID: 11190959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The dependency of wedge factors on field size and depth in megavoltage beams.
    Avadhani JS; Pradhan AS; Sankar A; Viswanathan PS
    Strahlenther Onkol; 1996 Nov; 172(11):626-30. PubMed ID: 8946032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The fraction of photons undergoing head scatter in x-ray beams.
    Zhu TC; Bjärngard BE
    Phys Med Biol; 1995 Jun; 40(6):1127-34. PubMed ID: 7659734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Comparison of beam characteristics of a gold x-ray target and a tungsten replacement target.
    Faddegon B; Egley B; Steinberg T
    Med Phys; 2004 Jan; 31(1):91-7. PubMed ID: 14761025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Surface and peripheral doses of dynamic and physical wedges.
    Li Z; Klein EE
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1997 Mar; 37(4):921-5. PubMed ID: 9128970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A practical method to calculate head scatter factors in wedged rectangular and irregular MLC shaped beams for external and internal wedges.
    Georg D; Olofsson J; Künzler T; Aiginger H; Karlsson M
    Phys Med Biol; 2004 Oct; 49(20):4689-700. PubMed ID: 15566168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Dosimetry and clinical implementation of dynamic wedge.
    Klein EE; Low DA; Meigooni AS; Purdy JA
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1995 Feb; 31(3):583-92. PubMed ID: 7852124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. SU-E-T-151: Effect of Surface Dose and Depth of Maximum Dose with Physical Wedge Filters for 6MV Flattened and 7MV Unflattened Photon Beams.
    Ashokkumar S; Sinha SN; Yadav G; Raman K; Thiyagarajan R; Nambiraj NA
    Med Phys; 2012 Jun; 39(6Part12):3737-3738. PubMed ID: 28517808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Wedge filters for megavoltage roentgen ray beams.
    van der Laarse R; van Overbeek PA; Strackee J
    Acta Radiol Oncol; 1984; 23(6):477-84. PubMed ID: 6099043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Differences in wedge factor determination in air using a PMMA mini-phantom or a brass build-up cap.
    Heukelom S; Lanson JH; Mijnheer BJ
    Med Phys; 1997 Dec; 24(12):1986-91. PubMed ID: 9434981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.