These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4048883)

  • 1. The Mitroflow pericardial heart valve. In vitro assessment over a range of sizes in aortic and mitral positions.
    Walker DK; Scotten LN; Brownlee RT
    Scand J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1985; 19(2):131-8. PubMed ID: 4048883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Hydrodynamic function of the second-generation mitroflow pericardial bioprosthesis.
    Jennings LM; El-Gatit A; Nagy ZL; Fisher J; Walker PG; Watterson KG
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2002 Jul; 74(1):63-8. PubMed ID: 12118805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. New generation tissue valves. Their in vitro function in the mitral position.
    Walker DK; Scotten LN; Brownlee RT
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1984 Oct; 88(4):573-82. PubMed ID: 6482489
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Small aortic annulus: the hydrodynamic performances of 5 commercially available tissue valves.
    Gerosa G; Tarzia V; Rizzoli G; Bottio T
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2006 May; 131(5):1058-64. PubMed ID: 16678590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Fluid dynamics of the CarboMedics kinetic bileaflet prosthetic heart valve.
    Baldwin JT; Campbell A; Luck C; Ogilvie W; Sauter J
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 1997 Feb; 11(2):287-92. PubMed ID: 9080157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Characterization of Effective Orifice Areas of Mitral Prosthetic Heart Valves: An In-Vitro Study.
    Evin M; Magne J; Grieve SM; Rieu R; Pibarot P
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2017 Nov; 26(6):677-687. PubMed ID: 30207118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Pulsed, continuous, and color flow Doppler echocardiographic assessment of normal and abnormal Ionescu-Shiley pericardial valves.
    Jacobs LE; Parry WR; Kotler MN
    J Card Surg; 1988 Sep; 3(3 Suppl):429-35. PubMed ID: 2980046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Björk-Shiley and Ionescu-Shiley heart valve prostheses. In vitro comparison of their hydrodynamic performance in the mitral position.
    Scotten LN; Walker DK; Brownlee RT
    Scand J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1983; 17(3):201-9. PubMed ID: 6648395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Impact of valve calcification on systolic and diastolic valvular function--an in vitro model.
    Dzemali O; Bakhtiary F; Steinseiffer U; Schmitz C; Glasmacher B; Moritz A; Kleine P
    J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino); 2008 Dec; 49(6):817-24. PubMed ID: 19043396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Mitroflow pericardial bioprosthesis. Comparison of early clinical performance in aortic and mitral positions.
    Jamieson WR; Pelletier LC; Gerein AN; Pomar J
    Can J Surg; 1992 Apr; 35(2):159-64. PubMed ID: 1562925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Hydrodynamic function of tilting disc prostheses and bileaflet valves in double valve replacement.
    Strüber M; Campbell A; Richard G; Laas J
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 1996; 10(6):422-7. PubMed ID: 8817137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Durability after aortic valve replacement with the Mitroflow versus the Perimount pericardial bioprosthesis: a single-centre experience in 2393 patients.
    Nielsen PH; Hjortdal V; Modrau IS; Jensen H; Kimose HH; Terp K; Poulsen SH; Smerup M; Nielsen SL
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2016 Jun; 49(6):1705-10. PubMed ID: 26984983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of the Performance of a Sutureless Bioprosthesis With Two Pericardial Stented Valves on Small Annuli: An In Vitro Study.
    Tasca G; Vismara R; Mangini A; Romagnoni C; Contino M; Redaelli A; Fiore GB; Antona C
    Ann Thorac Surg; 2017 Jan; 103(1):139-144. PubMed ID: 27544288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. In vitro hydrodynamic comparison of mitral valve prostheses at high flow rates.
    Gabbay S; McQueen DM; Yellin EL; Becker RM; Frater RW
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1978 Dec; 76(6):771-87. PubMed ID: 713584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Durability of pericardial versus porcine bioprosthetic heart valves.
    Grunkemeier GL; Furnary AP; Wu Y; Wang L; Starr A
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2012 Dec; 144(6):1381-6. PubMed ID: 23010581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparative hydrodynamic evaluation of bioprosthetic heart valves.
    Marquez S; Hon RT; Yoganathan AP
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2001 Nov; 10(6):802-11. PubMed ID: 11767190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Hemodynamic performance of the Carpentier-Edwards pericardial valve in the aortic position in vivo.
    Cosgrove DM; Lytle BW; Williams GW
    Circulation; 1985 Sep; 72(3 Pt 2):II146-52. PubMed ID: 4028359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Aortic valve-in-valve implantation: impact of transcatheter- bioprosthesis size mismatch.
    Azadani AN; Jaussaud N; Matthews PB; Chuter TA; Ge L; Guy TS; Guccione J; Tseng EE
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2009 Jul; 18(4):367-73. PubMed ID: 19852139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The in vitro function of 19-mm bioprosthetic heart valves in the aortic position.
    Scotten LN; Walker DK; Brownlee RT
    Life Support Syst; 1987; 5(2):145-53. PubMed ID: 3669721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Theoretical and practical differences between the Gorlin formula and the continuity equation for calculating aortic and mitral valve areas.
    Dumesnil JG; Yoganathan AP
    Am J Cardiol; 1991 Jun; 67(15):1268-72. PubMed ID: 2035453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.