These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

84 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4049062)

  • 1. [Method of analyzing and evaluating the activities of scientific research establishments].
    Zhuravleva TV; Doktorovich AB; Abramchenkov AP
    Sov Zdravookhr; 1985; (6):39-45. PubMed ID: 4049062
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Automated system for evaluating the activities of scientific institutions].
    Libenson VS; VelichkovskiÄ­ BT; Kozyr'kov SV; Rubacheva AN; AleÄ­nikova OA
    Sov Zdravookhr; 1984; (11):27-33. PubMed ID: 6523185
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Wellcome Trust sets out fresh misconduct standards.
    Klarreich E
    Nature; 2001 Aug; 412(6848):667. PubMed ID: 11507596
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Symposium overview: Raising standards.
    Grayson M
    Nature; 2015 Apr; 520(7549):S10-2. PubMed ID: 25924192
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Surviving misconduct is one thing, accountability is another.
    Nature; 1998 Oct; 395(6704):727. PubMed ID: 9796798
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation: Moving away from metrics.
    Kun H
    Nature; 2015 Apr; 520(7549):S18-20. PubMed ID: 25924194
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [International criteria of the research activity of groups and individual scientists in biology and medicine].
    Archakov AI; Karpova EA; Ponomarenko EA
    Vestn Ross Akad Med Nauk; 2013; (5):4-9. PubMed ID: 24000662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Are academic institutions corrupt?
    Raw M
    Lancet; 1993 Sep; 342(8873):746. PubMed ID: 8103854
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Grade expectations for German research institutes.
    Schiermeier Q
    Nature; 2004 Nov; 432(7015):260. PubMed ID: 15549058
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Council of General Health].
    Salud Publica Mex; 1982; 24(2):220-2. PubMed ID: 7112261
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Are academic institutions corrupt?
    Lock S
    Lancet; 1993 Sep; 342(8873):745. PubMed ID: 8103851
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Restoring good manners in research.
    Maddox J
    Nature; 1995 Jul; 376(6536):113. PubMed ID: 7603555
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Commercialization of academia research.
    Jamali F
    J Pharm Pharm Sci; 1999; 2(3):88. PubMed ID: 10953253
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Research and ophthalmology in the UK.
    Lancet; 1990 Aug; 336(8710):315. PubMed ID: 1974002
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Index 2014 Global.
    Campbell N; Grayson M
    Nature; 2014 Nov; 515(7526):S49. PubMed ID: 25390141
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Germany's science hubs win in major research revamp.
    Schiermeier Q
    Nature; 2016 Feb; 530(7588):18-9. PubMed ID: 26842038
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Introducing the Index.
    Nature; 2014 Nov; 515(7526):S52-3. PubMed ID: 25390142
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Rapid distribution of research materials: whose responsibility is it?
    Schimke RT
    Cell; 1988 Nov; 55(3):391-3. PubMed ID: 3180216
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. German biotech lab in bid to silence critic.
    Schiermeier Q; Abbott A
    Nature; 1999 Sep; 401(6750):201. PubMed ID: 10499563
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Publishing: Criteria for Nature Index questioned.
    Haunschild R; Bornmann L
    Nature; 2015 Jan; 517(7532):21. PubMed ID: 25557707
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.