These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4053665)

  • 1. Computed tomography in the pretreatment assessment of carcinoma of the cervix.
    Vas W; Wolverson M; Freel J; Salimi Z; Sundaram M
    J Comput Tomogr; 1985 Oct; 9(4):359-68. PubMed ID: 4053665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Predictive value of computerized tomography in the presurgical evaluation of primary carcinoma of the cervix.
    Camilien L; Gordon D; Fruchter RG; Maiman M; Boyce JG
    Gynecol Oncol; 1988 Jun; 30(2):209-15. PubMed ID: 3371746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Computed tomography in advanced carcinoma of the uterine cervix.
    Thorvinger B; Hauksson A; Samuelsson L; Tropé C
    Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh); 1984; 25(5):423-6. PubMed ID: 6507136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Prospective comparison between clinical and CT staging in primary cervical carcinoma.
    Walsh JW; Goplerud DR
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1981 Nov; 137(5):997-1003. PubMed ID: 6975028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of integrated positron emission tomography and computed tomography accuracy in detecting lymph node metastasis in patients with adenocarcinoma vs squamous cell carcinoma.
    Billè A; Okiror L; Skanjeti A; Errico L; Arena V; Penna D; Ardissone F; Pelosi E
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2013 Mar; 43(3):574-9. PubMed ID: 22689182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Role of computed tomography in the presurgical evaluation of carcinoma of the cervix.
    Kilcheski TS; Arger PH; Mulhern CB; Coleman BG; Kressel HY; Mikuta JI
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1981 Jun; 5(3):378-83. PubMed ID: 7240515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The value of CT in the diagnosis of recurrent carcinoma of the cervix.
    Heron CW; Husband JE; Williams MP; Dobbs HJ; Cosgrove DO
    Clin Radiol; 1988 Sep; 39(5):496-501. PubMed ID: 3053000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An evaluation of the computed tomographic scanner for the staging of carcinoma of the cervix.
    Brenner DE; Whitley NO; Prempree T; Villasanta U
    Cancer; 1982 Dec; 50(11):2323-8. PubMed ID: 7139528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Lymph node assessment with (18)F-FDG-PET and MRI in uterine cervical cancer.
    Monteil J; Maubon A; Leobon S; Roux S; Marin B; Renaudie J; Genet D; Fermeaux V; Aubard Y; Tubiana-Mathieu N
    Anticancer Res; 2011 Nov; 31(11):3865-71. PubMed ID: 22110211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Computed tomographic evaluation of carcinoma of the cervix.
    Whitley NO; Brenner DE; Francis A; Villa Santa U; Aisner J; Wiernik PH; Whitley J
    Radiology; 1982 Feb; 142(2):439-46. PubMed ID: 7054834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Clinical application of sentinel lymph node detection to early stage cervical cancer].
    Zhang WJ; Zheng R; Wu LY; Li XG; Li B; Chen SZ
    Ai Zheng; 2006 Feb; 25(2):224-8. PubMed ID: 16480592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Pretreatment staging of cervical cancer: is imaging better than palpation?: Role of CT and MRI in preoperative staging of cervical cancer: single institution results for 255 patients.
    Hancke K; Heilmann V; Straka P; Kreienberg R; Kurzeder C
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2008 Oct; 15(10):2856-61. PubMed ID: 18696156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Preoperative CT study of lymph nodes in cervical cancer--its correlation with histological findings.
    Matsukuma K; Tsukamoto N; Matsuyama T; Ono M; Nakano H
    Gynecol Oncol; 1989 May; 33(2):168-71. PubMed ID: 2703175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. F18-FDG-PET/CT in the evaluation of patients with suspected recurrent or persistent locally advanced cervical carcinoma.
    Cetina L; Serrano A; Cantú-de-León D; Pérez-Montiel D; Estrada E; Coronel J; Hernández-Lucio M; Dueñas-González A
    Rev Invest Clin; 2011; 63(3):227-35. PubMed ID: 21888286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Should Systematic Infrarenal Para-aortic Dissection Be the Rule in the Pretherapeutic Staging of Primary or Recurrent Locally Advanced Cervix Cancer Patients With a Negative Preoperative Para-aortic PET Imaging?
    Leblanc E; Katdare N; Narducci F; Bresson L; Gouy S; Morice P; Ferron G; Querleu D; Martinez A
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2016 Jan; 26(1):169-75. PubMed ID: 26569062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The role of ultrasound in primary workup of cervical cancer staging (ESGO, ESTRO, ESP cervical cancer guidelines).
    Fischerová D; Cibula D
    Ceska Gynekol; 2019; 84(1):40-48. PubMed ID: 31213057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Mediastinal lymph node staging by FDG-PET in patients with non-small cell lung cancer: analysis of false-positive FDG-PET findings.
    Konishi J; Yamazaki K; Tsukamoto E; Tamaki N; Onodera Y; Otake T; Morikawa T; Kinoshita I; Dosaka-Akita H; Nishimura M
    Respiration; 2003; 70(5):500-6. PubMed ID: 14665776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Computed tomography for the assessment of pelvic lymph node metastasis in cases of uterine cervical carcinoma].
    Yokoyama T; Hiura M; Myoga H; Yorishima M; Tanaka M; Chiba T; Inatsuki S
    Gan No Rinsho; 1990 Mar; 36(4):495-8. PubMed ID: 2319693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Utility of lymphangiography in the prediction of lymph node metastases in patients with cervical cancer.
    Munkarah AR; Jhingran A; Iyer RB; Wallace S; Eifel PJ; Gershenson D; Burke TW
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2002; 12(6):755-9. PubMed ID: 12445255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Isolated mediastinal lymph node false positivity of [18F]-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography in patients with cervical cancer.
    Onal C; Oymak E; Findikcioglu A; Reyhan M
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2013 Feb; 23(2):337-42. PubMed ID: 23358181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.