These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

68 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4053776)

  • 1. [Evaluation of the false-reaction non-stress test].
    Zhang DT
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 1985 Jul; 20(4):199-202, 252. PubMed ID: 4053776
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Human fetal breathing monitoring--clinical considerations.
    Manning FA; Platt LD
    Semin Perinatol; 1980 Oct; 4(4):311-8. PubMed ID: 7001639
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Monitoring of protracted pregnancy. Comparison of two methods].
    Pregazzi R; Bouchè C; Ricci G; Toffoletti FG; Levi D'Ancona R
    Minerva Ginecol; 1991 Apr; 43(4):195-8. PubMed ID: 1857519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Fetal assessment.
    Franz WB
    Prim Care; 1983 Jun; 10(2):173-203. PubMed ID: 6554829
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Contribution towards diagnostics of intrauterine fetal retardation (author's transl)].
    Kyank H
    Zentralbl Gynakol; 1980; 102(6):313-20. PubMed ID: 7467967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Prenatal cardiotocographic changes in an infant with uncertain gestational age].
    Löfgren O; Gennser G
    Lakartidningen; 1981 Aug; 78(35):2960-2. PubMed ID: 7311670
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Fetal acoustic stimulation test].
    Landa L; Alarcón H
    Rev Chil Obstet Ginecol; 1982; 47(3):160-6. PubMed ID: 7184064
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Continuing role of the nonstress test in the management of postdates pregnancy.
    Phelan JP; Platt LD; Yeh SY; Trujillo M; Paul RH
    Obstet Gynecol; 1984 Nov; 64(5):624-8. PubMed ID: 6493655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Fischer's fetal heart rate monitoring scoring system--clinical analysis of 300 fetal heart rate tracings].
    Zhang DT
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 1984 Apr; 19(2):102-7. PubMed ID: 6540655
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Assessment of the biophysical profile: the fetal Apgar].
    Ferguson HW
    Servir; 1989; 38(3):187-9. PubMed ID: 2502853
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Cardiotocographic monitoring of birth. Changes in the incidence of Cesarian section and in the condition of the infants as estimated by the Apgar score].
    Qvist N; Sørensen J; Grydehøj P
    Ugeskr Laeger; 1982 Oct; 144(43):3164-6. PubMed ID: 7157534
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Placental perfusion, endocrine parameters of pregnancy and cardiotocographic non-stress tests in cases of intrauterine retardation].
    Doszpod J; Török M; Prievara F; Csákány MG; Gáti I
    Zentralbl Gynakol; 1984; 106(21):1413-8. PubMed ID: 6516633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Bioelectric evaluation in intrauterine growth retardation.
    Cetrulo CL; Freeman R
    Clin Obstet Gynecol; 1977 Dec; 20(4):979-89. PubMed ID: 606456
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Electronic monitoring evidence of fetal distress in high-risk pregnancies.
    Peck T
    J Reprod Med; 1980 Mar; 24(3):103-8. PubMed ID: 7373591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Non-stress test. Evaluation of a new scheme for reading the results].
    Giannone R; Bernorio R; Bernardi F; Panizzardi G; Zandonini GF
    Minerva Ginecol; 1989 Feb; 41(2):105-7. PubMed ID: 2747995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Critical analysis of the validity of electronic fetal monitoring.
    Jongsma HW; Nijhuis JG
    Neonatal Intensive Care; 1992; 5(6):52-4. PubMed ID: 10148256
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Contraction stress test versus ductus venosus Doppler evaluation for the prediction of adverse perinatal outcome in growth-restricted fetuses with non-reassuring non-stress test.
    Figueras F; Martínez JM; Puerto B; Coll O; Cararach V; Vanrell JA
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Mar; 21(3):250-5. PubMed ID: 12666219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Importance of cardiotokography in the overall study of the prenatal fetal state].
    Sadauskas VM; Puodzhius SS; Fabienavichius AI
    Vopr Okhr Materin Det; 1980 Jan; 25(1):62-4. PubMed ID: 7385659
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring. VII. The impact of mode of delivery on fetal outcome.
    Krebs HB; Petres RE; Dunn LJ; Smith PJ
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1982 May; 143(2):190-4. PubMed ID: 7081332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Predictive value of intrapartum internal monitoring and cord blood gas analysis].
    Zhai GR
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 1985 Jul; 20(4):203-5, 252. PubMed ID: 4053777
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.