These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
46. Normal audiometric findings. Jerger J; Jordan C Am J Otol; 1980 Jan; 1(3):157-9. PubMed ID: 7457578 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. The AudioScope and family practice: field testing of a new instrument and a look at hearing loss in family practice. Griffin DH; Bordenick RM; Vernon M Md State Med J; 1984 Apr; 33(4):285-7. PubMed ID: 6727436 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
48. Comparative study of pure-tone, impedance, and otoscopic hearing screening methods. A survey of native Indian children in British Columbia. Roberts ME Arch Otolaryngol; 1976 Nov; 102(11):690-4. PubMed ID: 985203 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. [Contribution of the electrocochleography to the audiometric examination of the child]. Portmann M; Negrevergne M Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 1973; 94(7):359-79. PubMed ID: 4788113 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
50. Correlations between audiogram and objective hearing tests in sensorineural hearing loss. Bishara L; Ben-David J; Podoshin L; Fradis M; Teszler CB; Pratt H; Shpack T; Feiglin H; Hafner H; Herlinger N Int Tinnitus J; 1999; 5(2):107-12. PubMed ID: 10753428 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. [Scope of audiometric examination and the form of its analysis]. Kharshak EM Zh Ushn Nos Gorl Bolezn; 1969; 29(5):21-31. PubMed ID: 5396716 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
53. [Hearing disability in relation to audiometric threshold values: hypothesis on the determination of the onset of hearing loss]. Albera R; Beatrice F; Romano C; Coggiola M; Bosia S; Vergnano P; Luccoli L; Schindler A; Argentero P Med Lav; 2002; 93(1):11-9. PubMed ID: 11987497 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Cortical audiometry: an objective method of evaluating auditory acuity in awake and sleeping man. Cody DT; Klass DW; Bickford RG Trans Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol; 1967; 71(1):81-91. PubMed ID: 6050313 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
55. A neural network approach to the prediction of pure tone thresholds with distortion product emissions. Kimberley BP; Kimberley BM; Roth L Ear Nose Throat J; 1994 Nov; 73(11):812-3, 817-23. PubMed ID: 7828474 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Audiogram construction using frequency-specific auditory brainstem response (ABR) thresholds. Frattali MA; Sataloff RT; Hirshout D; Sokolow C; Hills J; Spiegel JR Ear Nose Throat J; 1995 Oct; 74(10):691-4, 696, 698, passim. PubMed ID: 8529547 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Comparison between hearing threshold measurements made with and without the aid of an ear speculum. Ivarsson A; Erlandsson B; Håkanson H; Nilsson P; Bennrup S; Sheppard H Audiology; 1983; 22(5):421-9. PubMed ID: 6651619 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. [Technical characteristics of the Békésy audiometer in diagnosis]. Keller F Z Laryngol Rhinol Otol; 1972 Oct; 51(10):709-15. PubMed ID: 5081039 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
59. The scope of present day audiometry. Coles RR Br J Audiol Suppl; 1979 Nov; 2():24-8. PubMed ID: 294302 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
60. Evaluation of the audioscope in an industrial setting. House RA; Pasut G J Occup Med; 1992 May; 34(5):539-45. PubMed ID: 1593294 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]