These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4054444)

  • 1. Spectral characteristics of air and bone conduction transducers used to record the auditory brain stem response.
    Schwartz DM; Larson VD; De Chicchis AR
    Ear Hear; 1985; 6(5):274-7. PubMed ID: 4054444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Measurements of bone conduction auditory brainstem response with the new audiometric bone conduction transducer Radioear B81.
    Keceli S; Stenfelt S
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Aug; 57(8):577-583. PubMed ID: 29911916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Air and bone conduction brain stem responses in adults and infants.
    Cornacchia L; Martini A; Morra B
    Audiology; 1983; 22(5):430-7. PubMed ID: 6651620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of Thresholds Obtained With the Radioear B-71 and B-81 Bone-Conduction Transducers.
    Rao A; Altus B; Schroeder R; Margolis RH
    Ear Hear; 2020; 41(6):1775-1778. PubMed ID: 33136651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A comparison of auditory brain stem response thresholds and latencies elicited by air- and bone-conducted stimuli.
    Gorga MP; Kaminski JR; Beauchaine KL; Bergman BM
    Ear Hear; 1993 Apr; 14(2):85-94. PubMed ID: 8472882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Brain stem evoked response audiometry study with a bone conduction receiver in atresia of the auditory canal and microtia].
    Flämig P; Gerull G; Mrowinski D
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1989 Feb; 68(2):92-4. PubMed ID: 2706066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Bone-conduction masking for threshold assessment in auditory brain stem response testing.
    Webb KC; Greenberg HJ
    Ear Hear; 1983; 4(5):261-6. PubMed ID: 6628853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Influence of transducer types on bone conduction hearing thresholds.
    Fröhlich L; Plontke SK; Rahne T
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(4):e0195233. PubMed ID: 29641550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. High frequency bone conduction auditory evoked potentials in the guinea pig: Assessing cochlear injury after ossicular chain manipulation.
    Bergin MJ; Bird PA; Vlajkovic SM; Thorne PR
    Hear Res; 2015 Dec; 330(Pt A):147-54. PubMed ID: 26493491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Characterization and Clinical Use of Bone Conduction Transducers at Extended High Frequencies.
    Remenschneider AK; Cheng JT; Herrmann BS; Rosowski JJ
    Hear Res; 2023 Mar; 429():108688. PubMed ID: 36628803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of Etymotic insert and TDH supra-aural earphones in auditory brainstem response measurement.
    Van Campen LE; Sammeth CA; Hall JW; Peek BF
    J Am Acad Audiol; 1992 Sep; 3(5):315-23. PubMed ID: 1421467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Auditory brainstem responses evoked by direct mechanical stimulation of the ossicular chain. Objective preoperative testing of candidates for implantable hearing aids].
    Hoth S; Lohaus M; Waldmann B
    HNO; 2003 Jul; 51(7):550-7. PubMed ID: 12904876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Infant air and bone conduction tone burst auditory brain stem responses for classification of hearing loss and the relationship to behavioral thresholds.
    Vander Werff KR; Prieve BA; Georgantas LM
    Ear Hear; 2009 Jun; 30(3):350-68. PubMed ID: 19322084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of Beyer DT48 and etymotic insert earphones: auditory brain stem response measurements.
    Beauchaine KA; Kaminski JR; Gorga MP
    Ear Hear; 1987 Oct; 8(5):292-7. PubMed ID: 3678644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Coupler output level differences resulting from repeated transducer placement.
    Frank T; Chaffinch JO; Svitko CS
    Ear Hear; 1986 Aug; 7(4):273-5. PubMed ID: 3743920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Auditory brain stem responses from graduates of an intensive care nursery using an insert earphone.
    Gorga MP; Kaminski JR; Beauchaine KA
    Ear Hear; 1988 Jun; 9(3):144-7. PubMed ID: 3410177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Using a combination of click- and tone burst-evoked auditory brain stem response measurements to estimate pure-tone thresholds.
    Gorga MP; Johnson TA; Kaminski JR; Beauchaine KL; Garner CA; Neely ST
    Ear Hear; 2006 Feb; 27(1):60-74. PubMed ID: 16446565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Administering audiometric speech tests via bone conduction: a comparison of transducers.
    Dolan TG; Morris SG
    Ear Hear; 1990 Dec; 11(6):446-9. PubMed ID: 2073978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Stimulus artefact reduction systems for the TDH-49 headphone in the recording of auditory evoked potentials.
    Cooper WA; Parker DJ
    Ear Hear; 1981; 2(6):283-93. PubMed ID: 7308604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Provisional stimulus level corrections for low frequency bone-conduction ABR in babies under three months corrected age.
    Ferm I; Lightfoot G; Stevens J
    Int J Audiol; 2014 Feb; 53(2):132-7. PubMed ID: 24320211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.