These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4056221)

  • 1. Relations among some psychoacoustic parameters in normal and cochlearly impaired listeners.
    Ludvigsen C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1985 Oct; 78(4):1271-80. PubMed ID: 4056221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effects of cochlear impairment and equivalent-threshold masking on psychoacoustic tuning curves.
    Florentine M
    Audiology; 1992; 31(5):241-53. PubMed ID: 1449429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. On the Interplay Between Cochlear Gain Loss and Temporal Envelope Coding Deficits.
    Verhulst S; Piktel P; Jagadeesh A; Mauermann M
    Adv Exp Med Biol; 2016; 894():467-475. PubMed ID: 27080688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Masking of tone bursts by modulated noise in normal, noise-masked normal, and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Humes LE
    J Speech Hear Res; 1990 Mar; 33(1):3-8. PubMed ID: 2314082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Characterizing auditory processing and perception in individual listeners with sensorineural hearing loss.
    Jepsen ML; Dau T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Jan; 129(1):262-81. PubMed ID: 21303008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Intensity perception. XIV. Intensity discrimination in listeners with sensorineural hearing loss.
    Florentine M; Reed CM; Rabinowitz WM; Braida LD; Durlach NI; Buus S
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1993 Nov; 94(5):2575-86. PubMed ID: 8270735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Excess masking among listeners with a sensorineural hearing loss.
    Gagné JP
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1988 Jun; 83(6):2311-21. PubMed ID: 3411023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Masking of pure tones by broad-band noise in cochlear-impaired listeners.
    Tyler RS; Fernandes MA; Wood EJ
    J Speech Hear Res; 1982 Mar; 25(1):117-24. PubMed ID: 7087412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A new procedure for measuring peripheral compression in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Nelson DA; Schroder AC; Wojtczak M
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Oct; 110(4):2045-64. PubMed ID: 11681384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Growth of low-pass masking of pure tones and speech for hearing-impaired and normal-hearing listeners.
    Dubno JR; Ahlstrom JB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1995 Dec; 98(6):3113-24. PubMed ID: 8550937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Upward spread of masking, hearing loss, and speech recognition in young and elderly listeners.
    Klein AJ; Mills JH; Adkins WY
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Mar; 87(3):1266-71. PubMed ID: 2324393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Short-term temporal integration: evidence for the influence of peripheral compression.
    Oxenham AJ; Moore BC; Vickers DA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1997 Jun; 101(6):3676-87. PubMed ID: 9193055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of fluctuating noise and interfering speech on the speech-reception threshold for impaired and normal hearing.
    Festen JM; Plomp R
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1990 Oct; 88(4):1725-36. PubMed ID: 2262629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Temporal modulation transfer functions in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Bacon SP; Viemeister NF
    Audiology; 1985; 24(2):117-34. PubMed ID: 3994589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Temporal integration of forward masking in listeners having sensorineural hearing loss.
    Kidd G; Mason CR; Feth LL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1984 Mar; 75(3):937-44. PubMed ID: 6707324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Temporal integration, frequency resolution, and off-frequency listening in normal-hearing and cochlear-impaired listeners.
    Hall JW; Fernandes MA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1983 Oct; 74(4):1172-7. PubMed ID: 6643838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Frequency selectivity and consonant recognition for hearing-impaired and normal-hearing listeners with equivalent masked thresholds.
    Dubno JR; Schaefer AB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1995 Feb; 97(2):1165-74. PubMed ID: 7876438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of frequency selectivity and consonant recognition among hearing-impaired and masked normal-hearing listeners.
    Dubno JR; Schaefer AB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1992 Apr; 91(4 Pt 1):2110-21. PubMed ID: 1597602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Speech recognition in noise: estimating effects of compressive nonlinearities in the basilar-membrane response.
    Horwitz AR; Ahlstrom JB; Dubno JR
    Ear Hear; 2007 Sep; 28(5):682-93. PubMed ID: 17804982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Masker phase effects in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners: evidence for peripheral compression at low signal frequencies.
    Oxenham AJ; Dau T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2004 Oct; 116(4 Pt 1):2248-57. PubMed ID: 15532656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.