These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4056292)
1. Combat spectacles: military testing of a new spectacle frame. Rengstorff RH J Am Optom Assoc; 1985 Sep; 56(9):702-5. PubMed ID: 4056292 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Testing safety eyewear: how frame and lens design affect lens retention. McMahon JM; Beckerman S Optometry; 2007 Feb; 78(2):78-87. PubMed ID: 17258162 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of combat eye protection on field of view among active-duty U.S. military personnel. Gunther PJ; Riddle MS Optometry; 2008 Nov; 79(11):663-9. PubMed ID: 19811763 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The fate of eyewear in aircraft ejections. O'Connell SR; Markovits AS Aviat Space Environ Med; 1995 Feb; 66(2):104-7. PubMed ID: 7726771 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assessment of a Prototype Apache Flight Eyewear. Walsh DV; Jurek GM; McLean WE; Statz JK; Allen RL; Riggs DW Aerosp Med Hum Perform; 2016 Sep; 87(9):800-5. PubMed ID: 27634700 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Evaluation of integrated night vision goggle (NVG) helmets under sustained +Gz. McCloskey K; Esken RL Aviat Space Environ Med; 1995 Feb; 66(2):118-25. PubMed ID: 7726774 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The depth, contour and angle of the glazing grooves of spectacle frames: don't blame the glazer? Walsh G; Mitchell JW Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2000 Jul; 20(4):290-7. PubMed ID: 10962694 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Assessment of an Alternative Army Aircrew Eyewear. Walsh DV; Jurek GM; Capó-Aponte JE; Riggs DW; Ramiccio JA Aerosp Med Hum Perform; 2015 Dec; 86(12):1014-9. PubMed ID: 26630047 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Three-dimensional face shape analysis of French adults, and its application to the design of protective equipment. Coblentz A; Mollard R; Ignazi G Ergonomics; 1991 Apr; 34(4):497-517. PubMed ID: 1860465 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Visual performance effects and user acceptance of the M43A1 aviation protective mask frontserts. Wildzunas RM Aviat Space Environ Med; 1995 Dec; 66(12):1136-43. PubMed ID: 8747606 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Analysis of 3D face forms for proper sizing and CAD of spectacle frames. Kouchi M; Mochimaru M Ergonomics; 2004 Nov; 47(14):1499-516. PubMed ID: 15697066 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Do modern spectacles endanger surgeons? The Waikato Eye Protection Study. Chong SJ; Smith C; Bialostocki A; McEwan CN Ann Surg; 2007 Mar; 245(3):495-501. PubMed ID: 17435558 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Burns sustained in combat explosions in Operations Iraqi and Enduring Freedom (OIF/OEF explosion burns). Kauvar DS; Wolf SE; Wade CE; Cancio LC; Renz EM; Holcomb JB Burns; 2006 Nov; 32(7):853-7. PubMed ID: 16899341 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The effect of a new ejection seat headbox and high G garments on head mobility during air combat. McCarthy GW; Anton DJ; Bayley NJ; Martin TE; Stallard N Aviat Space Environ Med; 1994 Mar; 65(3):187-92. PubMed ID: 8185545 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The weight of spectacle frames and the area of their nose pads. Walsh G Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2010 Jul; 30(4):402-4. PubMed ID: 20629962 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Head and facial anthropometry of mixed-race US Army male soldiers for military design and sizing: a pilot study. Yokota M Appl Ergon; 2005 May; 36(3):379-83. PubMed ID: 15854582 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The misting characteristics of spectacle lenses. Margrain TH; Owen C Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1996 Mar; 16(2):108-14. PubMed ID: 8762771 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Prescribing spectacles: reasons for failure of spectacle lens acceptance. Hrynchak P Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2006 Jan; 26(1):111-5. PubMed ID: 16390490 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]