These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

87 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4056293)

  • 1. Comparison of the acceptance of progressive addition multifocal vs. a standard multifocal lens design.
    Hitzeman SA; Myers CO
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1985 Sep; 56(9):706-10. PubMed ID: 4056293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Patient preference for a progressive addition multifocal lens (Varilux2) vs a standard multifocal lens design (ST-25).
    Spaulding DH
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1981 Oct; 52(10):789-94. PubMed ID: 7320370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of the acceptance of progressive addition multifocals with blended bifocals.
    Borish IM; Hitzeman SA
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1983 May; 54(5):415-22. PubMed ID: 6345640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effectiveness of multifocal correction upon presbyopic near and intermediate visual resolution performance.
    Barker FM
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1984 Oct; 55(10):753-7. PubMed ID: 6491121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Visual performance of subjects wearing presbyopic contact lenses.
    Rajagopalan AS; Bennett ES; Lakshminarayanan V
    Optom Vis Sci; 2006 Aug; 83(8):611-5. PubMed ID: 16909087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [The advantages and disadvantages of bifocal lenses].
    Zanen A
    Bull Soc Belge Ophtalmol; 1997; 264():71-8. PubMed ID: 9490160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Visual comparison of multifocal contact lens to monovision.
    Gupta N; Naroo SA; Wolffsohn JS
    Optom Vis Sci; 2009 Feb; 86(2):E98-105. PubMed ID: 19156009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Acceptance of progressive lenses].
    Krause K
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1996; 209(2-3):94-9. PubMed ID: 8992091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A prospective comparative study of the AMO ARRAY zonal-progressive multifocal silicone intraocular lens and a monofocal intraocular lens.
    Steinert RF; Aker BL; Trentacost DJ; Smith PJ; Tarantino N
    Ophthalmology; 1999 Jul; 106(7):1243-55. PubMed ID: 10406601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of multifocal and monovision soft contact lens corrections in patients with low-astigmatic presbyopia.
    Richdale K; Mitchell GL; Zadnik K
    Optom Vis Sci; 2006 May; 83(5):266-73. PubMed ID: 16699438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Double masked study of progressive addition lenses.
    Borish IM; Hitzeman SA; Brookman KE
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1980 Oct; 51(10):933-43. PubMed ID: 7005296
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. All-distance visual acuity and contrast visual acuity in eyes with a refractive multifocal intraocular lens with minimal added power.
    Hayashi K; Yoshida M; Hayashi H
    Ophthalmology; 2009 Mar; 116(3):401-8. PubMed ID: 19152978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison between "readables" aspheric spectacle lenses and conventional spherical spectacle lenses for overcorrection of presbyopic single-vision contact lens wearers.
    Bachman WG
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1993 Mar; 64(3):206-9. PubMed ID: 8454839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. One-year outcomes with new-generation multifocal intraocular lenses.
    Cillino S; Casuccio A; Di Pace F; Morreale R; Pillitteri F; Cillino G; Lodato G
    Ophthalmology; 2008 Sep; 115(9):1508-16. PubMed ID: 18538402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Factors influencing patient acceptance of Varilux 2 lenses.
    Schultz DN
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1983 Jun; 54(6):513-20. PubMed ID: 6875163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Comparison of visual results and quality of vision between two multifocal intraocular lenses. Multifocal silicone and bifocal PMMA].
    Lesueur L; Gajan B; Nardin M; Chapotot E; Arne JL
    J Fr Ophtalmol; 2000 Apr; 23(4):355-9. PubMed ID: 10794984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Early symptomatic presbyopes--what correction modality works best?
    Woods J; Woods CA; Fonn D
    Eye Contact Lens; 2009 Sep; 35(5):221-6. PubMed ID: 19675462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Synergeyes versus soft toric lenses: vision-related quality of life.
    Lipson MJ; Musch DC
    Optom Vis Sci; 2007 Jul; 84(7):593-7. PubMed ID: 17632307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of bifocal and progressive addition lenses on aviator target detection performance.
    Markovits AS; Reddix MD; O'Connell SR; Collyer PD
    Aviat Space Environ Med; 1995 Apr; 66(4):303-8. PubMed ID: 7794220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Lined multifocal wearers prefer progressive addition lenses.
    Boroyan HJ; Cho MH; Fuller BC; Krefman RA; McDougall JH; Schaeffer JL; Tahran RL
    J Am Optom Assoc; 1995 May; 66(5):296-300. PubMed ID: 7629370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.