These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

100 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4057236)

  • 1. Use of NBME examinations.
    Baum JH
    J Med Educ; 1985 Nov; 60(11):895. PubMed ID: 4057236
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Use of NBME and USMLE examinations to evaluate medical education programs.
    Williams RG
    Acad Med; 1993 Oct; 68(10):748-52. PubMed ID: 8397599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The essential elements of undergraduate medical education in obstetrics and gynecology: a comparison of the Association of Professors of Gynecology and Obstetrics Medical Student Educational Objectives and the National Board of Medical Examiners Subject Examination.
    Hammoud MM; Cox SM; Goff B; Goepfert A; Butler A; Swanson DB; Holtzman KZ; Allbee K; Katz NT; Erickson SS
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Nov; 193(5):1773-9. PubMed ID: 16260232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Relationship between scores on NBME basic science subject tests and the first administration of the newly designed NBME Part I examination.
    Case SM; Becker DF; Swanson DB
    Acad Med; 1992 Oct; 67(10 Suppl):S13-5. PubMed ID: 1388541
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Using the new MCAT and NBME subject examinations to predict performance in a medical school behavioral sciences course.
    Beaton JM; Brooks CM; Maisiak R; Willcutt HC; Linton PH
    Annu Conf Res Med Educ; 1981; 20():141-5. PubMed ID: 7347517
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessment of constituency opinion about NBME examination standards.
    Orr NA; Nungester RJ
    Acad Med; 1991 Aug; 66(8):465-70. PubMed ID: 1883431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Predictors of medical school clerkship performance: a multispecialty longitudinal analysis of standardized examination scores and clinical assessments.
    Casey PM; Palmer BA; Thompson GB; Laack TA; Thomas MR; Hartz MF; Jensen JR; Sandefur BJ; Hammack JE; Swanson JW; Sheeler RD; Grande JP
    BMC Med Educ; 2016 Apr; 16():128. PubMed ID: 27121276
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An evaluation of a preparation program for medical students who previously failed part I of the NBME examinations.
    Blanc R; Martin DC
    J Med Educ; 1984 Aug; 59(8):667-9. PubMed ID: 6748034
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Phase-in of the NBME comprehensive Part I examination.
    Swanson DB; Case SM; Kelley PR; Lawley JL; Nungester RJ; Powell RD; Volle RL
    Acad Med; 1991 Aug; 66(8):443-4. PubMed ID: 1883426
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Using ratings of resident competence to evaluate NBME examination passing standards.
    Turner BJ; Hojat M; Gonnella JS
    J Med Educ; 1987 Jul; 62(7):572-81. PubMed ID: 3599053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Results of the initial administrations of the NBME comprehensive Part I and Part II examinations.
    Becker DF; Swanson DB; Case SM; Nungester RJ
    Acad Med; 1992 Oct; 67(10 Suppl):S16-8. PubMed ID: 1388542
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Using the NBME self-assessments to project performance on USMLE Step 1 and Step 2: impact of test administration conditions.
    Sawhill A; Butler A; Ripkey D; Swanson DB; Subhiyah R; Thelman J; Walsh W; Holtzman KZ; Angelucci K
    Acad Med; 2004 Oct; 79(10 Suppl):S55-7. PubMed ID: 15383390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Performances on the NBME I, II, and III by medical students in the problem-based learning and conventional tracks at the University of New Mexico.
    Mennin SP; Friedman M; Skipper B; Kalishman S; Snyder J
    Acad Med; 1993 Aug; 68(8):616-24. PubMed ID: 8352874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of Basic Science Knowledge Between DO and MD Students.
    Davis GE; Gayer GG
    J Am Osteopath Assoc; 2017 Feb; 117(2):114-123. PubMed ID: 28134953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Standard-setting plans for the NBME comprehensive Part I and Part II examinations.
    Nungester RJ; Dillon GF; Swanson DB; Orr NA; Powell RD
    Acad Med; 1991 Aug; 66(8):429-33. PubMed ID: 1883423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The quality of in-house medical school examinations.
    Jozefowicz RF; Koeppen BM; Case S; Galbraith R; Swanson D; Glew RH
    Acad Med; 2002 Feb; 77(2):156-61. PubMed ID: 11841981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Performance on the NBME Part I examination.
    Nickens H
    JAMA; 1995 Feb; 273(8):617; author reply 618. PubMed ID: 7710522
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Performance on the NBME Part I examination.
    Uva JL
    JAMA; 1995 Feb; 273(8):617; author reply 618. PubMed ID: 7844863
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Performance on the NBME Part I examination.
    Xu G; Veloski JJ; Hojat M
    JAMA; 1995 Feb; 273(8):617-8. PubMed ID: 7844864
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Student performance on the NBME Part II subtest and subject examination in obstetrics-gynecology.
    Metheny WP; Holzman GB
    J Med Educ; 1988 Jun; 63(6):456-62. PubMed ID: 3373501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.