315 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4058046)
1. Long-term comparative analysis of the Björk-Shiley and Hancock valves implanted in 1975.
Martinell J; Fraile J; Artiz V; Moreno J; Rábago G
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1985 Nov; 90(5):741-9. PubMed ID: 4058046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Aortic valve replacement with the Hancock standard, Björk-Shiley, and Lillehei-Kaster prostheses. A comparison based on follow-up from 1 to 15 years.
Milano AD; Bortolotti U; Mazzucco A; Guerra F; Magni A; Gallucci V
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1989 Jul; 98(1):37-47. PubMed ID: 2739424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparative clinical results with Omniscience (STM1), Medtronic-Hall, and Björk-Shiley convexo-concave (70 degrees) prostheses in mitral valve replacement.
Cortina JM; Martinell J; Artiz V; Fraile J; Rábago G
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1986 Feb; 91(2):174-83. PubMed ID: 3945084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Twelve-year comparison of a Bjork-Shiley mechanical heart valve with porcine bioprostheses.
Bloomfield P; Wheatley DJ; Prescott RJ; Miller HC
N Engl J Med; 1991 Feb; 324(9):573-9. PubMed ID: 1992318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Björk-Shiley and Carpentier-Edwards valves. A comparative analysis.
Nashef SA; Sethia B; Turner MA; Davidson KG; Lewis S; Bain WH
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1987 Mar; 93(3):394-404. PubMed ID: 3821149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparative analysis of mechanical and bioprosthetic valves after aortic valve replacement.
Borkon AM; Soule LM; Baughman KL; Aoun H; Baumgartner WA; Gardner TJ; Watkins L; Gott VL; Reitz BA
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1987 Jul; 94(1):20-33. PubMed ID: 3600005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Clinical results of pericardial xenograft valves: the Ionescu-Shiley and Hancock valves.
Goldman B; Scully H; Tong C; Mandell R; Butany J; Azuma J; Schwartz L
Can J Cardiol; 1988 Sep; 4(6):328-32. PubMed ID: 3179796
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Late results of valve replacement with the Björk-Shiley valve (1973 to 1982).
Orszulak TA; Schaff HV; DeSmet JM; Danielson GK; Pluth JR; Puga FJ
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1993 Feb; 105(2):302-12. PubMed ID: 8429659
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Fourteen years' experience with the Björk-Shiley tilting disc prosthesis.
Sethia B; Turner MA; Lewis S; Rodger RA; Bain WH
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1986 Mar; 91(3):350-61. PubMed ID: 3951241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. An eight-year experience with porcine bioprosthetic cardiac valves.
Hartz RS; Fisher EB; Finkelmeier B; DeBoer A; Sanders JH; Moran JM; Michaelis LL
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1986 Jun; 91(6):910-7. PubMed ID: 3713240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Early mechanical failures of the Hancock pericardial xenograft.
Bortolotti U; Milano A; Thiene G; Guerra F; Mazzucco A; Valente M; Talenti E; Gallucci V
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1987 Aug; 94(2):200-7. PubMed ID: 3613618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Long-term follow-up of aortic or mitral valve replacement. Comparison of results following implantation of a mechanical or biological artificial valve].
Mudra H; Rudolph W
Herz; 1986 Apr; 11(2):97-115. PubMed ID: 3699678
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of porcine valve xenografts with mechanical prostheses. A 7 1/2 year experience.
Joyce LD; Nelson RM
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1984 Jul; 88(1):102-13. PubMed ID: 6738092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Early and late risk of mitral valve replacement. A 12 year concomitant comparison of the porcine bioprosthetic and prosthetic disc mitral valves.
Cohn LH; Allred EN; Cohn LA; Austin JC; Sabik J; DiSesa VJ; Shemin RJ; Collins JJ
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1985 Dec; 90(6):872-81. PubMed ID: 4068737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Long-term clinical results after aortic valve replacement with the Björk-Shiley prosthesis.
Lindblom D
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1988 Apr; 95(4):658-67. PubMed ID: 3352301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Long-term results over 20 years of aortic valve replacement with the standard Björk-Shiley prosthesis].
Valla J; Langanay T; Corbineau H; Sevray B; Chaperon J; Menestret P; Lelong B; Leguerrier A; Rioux C; Logeais Y
Arch Mal Coeur Vaiss; 1996 Sep; 89(9):1137-43. PubMed ID: 8952837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The Björk-Shiley valve prosthesis. Analysis of long-term evolution.
Alvarez L; Escudero C; Figuera D; Castillo-Olivares JL
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1992 Nov; 104(5):1249-58. PubMed ID: 1434701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Long-term clinical results after mitral valve replacement with the Björk-Shiley prosthesis.
Lindblom D
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1988 Feb; 95(2):321-33. PubMed ID: 3339899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Late results after left-sided cardiac valve replacement in children.
Milano A; Vouhé PR; Baillot-Vernant F; Donzeau-Gouge P; Trinquet F; Roux PM; Leca F; Neveux JY
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1986 Aug; 92(2):218-25. PubMed ID: 3736079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A prospective evaluation of the Björk-Shiley, Hancock, and Carpentier-Edwards heart valve prostheses.
Bloomfield P; Kitchin AH; Wheatley DJ; Walbaum PR; Lutz W; Miller HC
Circulation; 1986 Jun; 73(6):1213-22. PubMed ID: 3516447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
