These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 4058822)

  • 1. Latent phase of labor in normal patients: a reassessment.
    Peisner DB; Rosen MG
    Obstet Gynecol; 1985 Nov; 66(5):644-8. PubMed ID: 4058822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Transition from latent to active labor.
    Peisner DB; Rosen MG
    Obstet Gynecol; 1986 Oct; 68(4):448-51. PubMed ID: 3748488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of amniotic membrane rupture on length of labor.
    Rosen MG; Peisner DB
    Obstet Gynecol; 1987 Oct; 70(4):604-7. PubMed ID: 3627629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Evaluation of cervix dilatation in the active phase].
    Straube W; Kiwitt A; Reincke I
    Zentralbl Gynakol; 1986; 108(1):54-6. PubMed ID: 3953176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Graphic analysis of actively managed labor: prospective computation of labor progress in 500 consecutive nulliparous women in spontaneous labor at term.
    Impey L; Hobson J; O'herlihy C
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2000 Aug; 183(2):438-43. PubMed ID: 10942483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Predictive value of cervical dilatation rates in labor in multiparous women.
    Evans MI; Lachman E; Kral S; Melmed H
    Isr J Med Sci; 1976 Dec; 12(12):1399-403. PubMed ID: 1017939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Evolution and quality of care during labor and delivery in primiparous patients who underwent early obstetrical analgesia].
    Morgan-Ortiz F; Quintero-Ledezma JC; Pérez-Sotelo JA; Trapero-Morales M
    Ginecol Obstet Mex; 1999 Nov; 67():522-6. PubMed ID: 10630057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Factors associated with the length of the latent phase during labor induction.
    Grobman WA; Simon C
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2007 Jun; 132(2):163-6. PubMed ID: 17010501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Urinary bladder distention: effect on labor and uterine activity.
    Read JA; Miller FC; Yeh S; Platt LD
    Obstet Gynecol; 1980 Nov; 56(5):565-70. PubMed ID: 7432726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Dynamics of the dilatation of as uteri during birth].
    Woraschk HJ; Ehinger B; Röpke F
    Zentralbl Gynakol; 1978; 100(18):1173-7. PubMed ID: 716687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of the labor curve in nulliparous Japanese women.
    Suzuki R; Horiuchi S; Ohtsu H
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Sep; 203(3):226.e1-6. PubMed ID: 20494329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. When has an induction failed?
    Simon CE; Grobman WA
    Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Apr; 105(4):705-9. PubMed ID: 15802394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Impact of cervical effacement and fetal station on progress during the first stage of labor: a biexponential model.
    Quincy MM; Weng C; Shafer SL; Smiley RM; Flood PD; Mirza FG
    Am J Perinatol; 2014 Oct; 31(9):745-51. PubMed ID: 24338118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Outcomes of women presenting in active versus latent phase of spontaneous labor.
    Bailit JL; Dierker L; Blanchard MH; Mercer BM
    Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Jan; 105(1):77-9. PubMed ID: 15625145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The impact of parity on course of labor in a contemporary population.
    Vahratian A; Hoffman MK; Troendle JF; Zhang J
    Birth; 2006 Mar; 33(1):12-7. PubMed ID: 16499527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Normal and abnormal labor progress: I. A quantitative assessment and survey of the literature.
    Sokol RJ; Stojkov J; Chik L; Rosen MG
    J Reprod Med; 1977 Jan; 18(1):47-53. PubMed ID: 833800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Influence of fixed and time-dependent factors on duration of normal first stage labor.
    Gross MM; Drobnic S; Keirse MJ
    Birth; 2005 Mar; 32(1):27-33. PubMed ID: 15725202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Cervical ripeness. I. The clinical criteria of assessment of ripeness and their variability at term].
    Lamberti G
    Z Geburtshilfe Perinatol; 1982; 186(4):187-91. PubMed ID: 6891536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Factors predicting successful labor induction.
    Watson WJ; Stevens D; Welter S; Day D
    Obstet Gynecol; 1996 Dec; 88(6):990-2. PubMed ID: 8942840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Primiparae--the role of age on the duration and disorders in the progression of labor].
    Popov I; Tanchev S; Tsanov G; Moskova P
    Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 1993; 32(1):5-6. PubMed ID: 8172353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.