These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Illusions about the Poggendorff illusion: comment on Poulton's "Geometric illusions in reading graphs". Hotopf WH Percept Psychophys; 1986 Feb; 39(2):148-50. PubMed ID: 3725539 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Individual differences in visual-geometric illusions: predictions from measures of spatial cognitive abilities. Coren S; Porac C Percept Psychophys; 1987 Mar; 41(3):211-9. PubMed ID: 3575080 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. [The influence of various modes of presentation and type of embeddedness on the perception of geometric optical illusions]. Scheller R Z Exp Angew Psychol; 1979; 26(2):305-14. PubMed ID: 483893 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Evidence for the role of attentive fields in the perception of illusions. Pressey AW Q J Exp Psychol; 1974 Aug; 26(Pt3):464-71. PubMed ID: 4413337 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Visual illusions with acute and obtuse angles: configurational effects and observer strategies. Wenderoth P; Johnson M Percept Psychophys; 1982 Mar; 31(3):243-50. PubMed ID: 7088666 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. The components of the standard and reverse Müller-Lyer illusions. Worrall N; Firth D Q J Exp Psychol; 1974 Aug; 26(Pt3):342-54. PubMed ID: 4416131 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The paradoxical moon illusions. Gilinsky AS Percept Mot Skills; 1980 Feb; 50(1):271-83. PubMed ID: 7367178 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Orientation and alignment misjudgement: new geometrical optical illusions? Yakimoff N Perception; 1985; 14(6):775-7. PubMed ID: 3837879 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Assimilation and contrast illusions: differences in plasticity. Girgus JS; Coren S Percept Psychophys; 1982 Dec; 32(6):555-61. PubMed ID: 7167354 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. An application of the gradient space representation. Clement RA Percept Psychophys; 1986 Mar; 39(3):222-4. PubMed ID: 3737348 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Geometric-optical illusions: an update on the output of publications. Zusne L Percept Mot Skills; 1986 Jun; 62(3):729-30. PubMed ID: 3725512 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A spatial frequency effect on perceived depth. Brown JM; Weisstein N Percept Psychophys; 1988 Aug; 44(2):157-66. PubMed ID: 3405742 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. A new illusion and possible links with the Münsterberg and Fraser illusions of direction. Taylor SP; Woodhouse JM Perception; 1980; 9(4):479-81. PubMed ID: 7422465 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Revisitation of the family tie between Münsterberg and Taylor-Woodhouse illusions. Bressan P Perception; 1985; 14(5):579-85. PubMed ID: 3836390 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cultural differences in the perception of geometric illusions. SEGALL MH; CAMPBELL DT; HERSKOVITS MJ Science; 1963 Feb; 139(3556):769-71. PubMed ID: 13987678 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Interpretation of neurophysiologic visual illusions]. Fugulyan G; Rajka V Rev Chir Oncol Radiol O R L Oftalmol Stomatol Ser Oftalmol; 1985; 29(4):257-67. PubMed ID: 2939497 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. No evidence for apparent extent between parallels as the basis of the Poggendorff effect. Day RH; Jolly WJ; Duffy FM Percept Psychophys; 1987 Dec; 42(6):561-8. PubMed ID: 3696950 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]